• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Trump says the Epstein list is a conspiracy created by Obama and Clinton

Do you believe Trump is in the Epstein List?

  • Yes, absolutely.

    Votes: 222 55.8%
  • Yes, probably.

    Votes: 113 28.4%
  • No, he's not on the list.

    Votes: 28 7.0%
  • No, there is no list. So of course he's not on it.

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • I'm on the fence.

    Votes: 17 4.3%

  • Total voters
    398
It's his own posts for something he claimed he "never believed" from 5 years after the accusations already fell apart, you complete idiot. You having trouble reading again?<lol>
Again?
And you sticking up for an adjudicated rapist convicted felon shows how deep seated your cult TDS has fucked you in the head. Or did you not vote for him and we've got it all wrong?
 
You cannot prove it definitively, it's an impossibility .

@nixkid should have bet you , he could have easily worded it to screw you or I should say so you would screw yourself.
lol you wish and were you been ? I don't see you post that much bro
 
8 posts ... Noting on topic Cult Boi. You've been programmed.
You willingly voted for a convicted felon adjudicated rapist, or am I painting you with a terrible brush here and you didn't? The TDS cult behaviour being a foot soldier to try and sway everyone away from him being a P word is pretty sweet. I'm sure he appreciates the support, pumpkin.
 
Glad you could admit you were wrong I guess but I accept your moving of the goal posts

First , no , sexually predatory behaviour is not necessarily criminal, I can expand on that or you can Google it yourself

Have you been living in a cave ?

He has 25 or so credible accusers including EJean Carrol and he was convicted for that one

Then there is Ivana Trump , go read what she said in her deposition

His best friend was Geoffrey fucking Epstein

His creeping on young girls at teen beauty
pageants

His creeping on regular beauty pageant contestants

His creepy behaviour in regards to his own daughters , it's pretty fucking weird at best

He's bragged about loving fucking "friends" wives

And if you don't believe all that believe Trump himself, he told he just grabs them by the pussy , he doesn't even ask


Your argument is bloody stupid , famous people get away with shit , Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein and trumps great pal Geoffrey Epstein are excellent examples
This is just moronic. Lol at "credible". Your threshold for "credible" just means literally anything against anyone you don't like without a shred of proof. We already established that you thought the fucking Kavanaugh accusations were "credible" 5 years after they completely fell apart, unless you think preposterous claims that you don't even believe are "important discussion". So I'll ask again, why not a single criminal charge for any of these "credible" accusers?

And no, you're dead fucking wrong that he was "convicted". It wasn't even a criminal trial for "convicted" to even be an option, and the jury specifically said "no" on the rape allegation even in a civil suit with a low burden of proof, because she was just reciting an episode and "law and order" and couldn't even remember when it happened, but thinks it was sometime when she was pushing 60. You're a genuine idiot if you find an 80 year old hoarder reciting an episode of a TV show "credible".

You can't even stand by your own embarrassing horse shit. You call it "a topic worth discussing about the supreme court's credibility" in a thread about debunked Kavanaugh accusations then pretend later you never even believed it, and now you post in a thread about whether Trump was involved in an underage sex trafficking operation that he was a "sexual predator", then back right the fuck out of that too and claim "no no, I said sexual predator but I just meant he had consensual sex with married women decades ago" when asked to back up your accusations. What an absolute can who completely crumbles when asked to back up anything you say.



A sexual predator is someone who engages in sexual activity with another person in a predatory, abusive, or manipulative manner. This often involves seeking out vulnerable individuals, such as children or those under the influence, and using coercion or force. The term can apply to individuals who have committed sex crimes like assault, rape, or :eek::eek::eek::eek:philia, but also to those who exploit others for dominance and control, even without prior convictions.
 
Last edited:
Yea but Trump was on the plane with his wife and daughter as well as staff. Kind of doubt he's banging girls with them in tow.

Why does it have to be on the plane? Why couldn't it be in NYC or FLA?

Is it possible we don't have all the flight logs?


Seems like you just really WANT it to be true so you're trying to fit a round peg into a square hole.

I mean he didn't go to the island according to the flight logs so. Pretty sure Clinton is a horndog sleazeball, but there's simply no proof he was banging Epstein's girls.

How can our position be "without any concrete evidence, we can't say that to be true", but also - "Hey there is a dark underworld of billionaires trying to suppress the Epstein files".

We are both obv speculating here but I truly feel my stance is Occam's Razor.


He also got tons of "dark money" through various Superpacs as well as 1.2 billion directly from the Republican National Committee which represents all the standard players - Big Pharm, Insurance, etc. Substantially bigger players than Elon Musk alone.

You're saying he's not beholden to anyone then? LMAO c'mon. That is fucking retarded.

But I think you're doing some sleight of hand here -

The idea is, once again, not that "Trump's not beholden to people". Maybe I'm wrong, but it sounds like you're claiming that he's beholden to cover up the billionaires diddling kids.

And I think you're trying to suggest that it's more likely that multiple people, who have no public connection to Epstein, are trying to cover up THEIR crimes with him than it is that Epstein's former bestie might just be covering his own ass.


If he was so scared of exposure for himself, he wouldn't have made it this huge fucking deal for months. That makes zero sense.

Trump, Bondi and others kept publicly talking about it over an over. Even until very recently.

Then he does this abrupt about face.

Are you denying there are probably a ton of influential and powerful people that want to keep the Epstein files quiet? Shit seems pretty fucking obvious. The dude got killed in prison.

"Trump wouldn't have done some retarded shit" - disagree lol but especially so if he simply had anticipated being able to cover up or manipulate it.

I think it's more likely a few powerful presidents who used to be homies with Epstein got away with a conspiracy involving covering up crimes and murdering a guy in federal jail, more than it is that the CEO of Nestle and Ford or whatever did so.
 
This has been known for years. Now Trump is covering for a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile secret agent and all the clients. Fuck em both. Hell hang em both they both droned an american citizen to death without trial. Partisan games are for fucking losers.

Shhhh… don’t ruin the narrative. It’s all some of them have left, I think.

Same blood, different body. I love how people bicker and gaslight over a bunch of rich, pretentious fucks that have no idea (or want to have an idea) of what it’s like to be them. The silver spoon, if they aren’t born with it they work to achieve it.
 
Trump cucks like @Whippy McGee becoming peeterphile apologists...it was foretold and expected
I honestly have to throw a coin up in the air to see if they are literally defending the convicted felon adjudicated rapist because they're too stupid to back down or they're trolling.
 
It's hilarious that in a thread that has hard proof of treason by the Obama Administration and the Left Cult can't deal with the topic. They never gave a shit about Epstein while Obama or Biden were in office, but suddenly it's all their programmed little minds can think about. Treason? Who cares... when you're Left Cult.

Just like CNN and MSNBC and the like won’t touch this with a 50 ft poll. It shows they fell for it, doubled down on it for years. They can’t cover it because it shows how biased they are and their lack of credibility over the last 10 years, and actually much more, considering a lot of people involved will also be connected to the bush years, Iraq, and then years later, Ukraine conflicts.

Then imagine being the news consumer who bought into all that and blamed it all on Trump lol. The cognitive dissonance is real

Same intel officials that also are involved with the handling of the Epstein case which was over decades as well

How it started



How it is going last year, fearing a trump return.



Then even this week, regarding unsealing my the NY court documents. Of course these freaks don’t want anyone to see what they were doing and obviously hid





He knows how corrupt they all are, the politicos in the intel agencies that basically run DC with the military industrial complex
 
Last edited:
lol you wish and were you been ? I don't see you post that much bro

My best self is no where near this place lol , I've always taken long brakes and I will again .

Sorry but you can't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt , even if you followed all the data to its source and that was let's say Iran or Belarus or Ukraine you couldn't prove definitively there wasn't Russian money or influence somewhere along the way and let's be honest, theres a good chance there was .

Russia is trying to fuck with most western countries, it makes sense from their standpoint, great bang for the buck .
 
I'm just curious if the staff is going to allow new standards here of calling public figures "kid fuckers" / :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes and to be able to constantly derail threads that are not the topic of your choice?

<BC1>

On topic, watching you run interference for an administration that committed straight up treason is telling. It shares with everyone exactly who you are.

a0qm4k.jpg
I am guessing we can call anyone that isn't a member (LOL) a kid-fucker.
 
This is just moronic. Lol at "credible". Your threshold for "credible" just means literally anything against anyone you don't like without a shred of proof. We already established that you thought the fucking Kavanaugh accusations were "credible" 5 years after they completely fell apart, unless you think preposterous claims that you don't even believe are "important discussion". So I'll ask again, why not a single criminal charge for any of these "credible" accusers?

And no, you're dead fucking wrong that he was "convicted". It wasn't even a criminal trial for "convicted" to even be an option, and the jury specifically said "no" on the rape allegation even in a civil suit with a low burden of proof, because she was just reciting an episode and "law and order" and couldn't even remember when it happened, but thinks it was sometime when she was pushing 60. You're a genuine idiot if you find an 80 year old hoarder reciting an episode of a TV show "credible".

You can't even stand by your own embarrassing horse shit. You call it "a topic worth discussing about the supreme court's credibility" in a thread about debunked Kavanaugh accusations then pretend later you never even believed it, and now you post in a thread about whether Trump was involved in an underage sex trafficking operation that he was a "sexual predator", then back right the fuck out of that too and claim "no no, I said sexual predator but I just meant he had consensual sex with married women decades ago" when asked to back up your accusations. What an absolute can who completely crumbles when asked to back up anything you say.



A sexual predator is someone who engages in sexual activity with another person in a predatory, abusive, or manipulative manner. This often involves seeking out vulnerable individuals, such as children or those under the influence, and using coercion or force. The term can apply to individuals who have committed sex crimes like assault, rape, or :eek::eek::eek::eek:philia, but also to those who exploit others for dominance and control, even without prior convictions.
I stopped at the mention of Kavanaugh, you showed piss all and that's just a pathetic diversion anyway

I've handed you your ass , now run along
 
I stopped at the mention of Kavanaugh, you showed piss all and that's just a pathetic diversion anyway

I've handed you your ass , now run along
Concession accepted, can. Maybe be a man for once in your life and stand by your nutty CTs instead of bitching out as soon as you're asked for proof.

Do you think Trump was banging minors or don't you? If yes, where is your proof? It's a simple question, that is the topic of the thread we're in, that you can't answer because the answer isn't the one you want it to be, so you just stick to being a weasel making implications and then bitch out again and say "that's not what I meant, bro" when asked for proof.
 
I stopped at the mention of Kavanaugh, you showed piss all and that's just a pathetic diversion anyway

I've handed you your ass , now run along
He chased me around calling me Baby Reindeer for weeks like I'm a fat Scottish woman, you had him at hello. He's not the brightest crayon in the box.
 
Back
Top