- Joined
- Feb 10, 2009
- Messages
- 64,006
- Reaction score
- 60,320
Maple Donut Dahmer.
Bro - that's so much better than my one!
(Doffs cap
Maple Donut Dahmer.
- But you guys have a lot of recidence. Theres maybe be a profit reason behind that?lol, we lock up such an insane number of people that if we are soft on crime than we are fucked in the head as a population
- Brazil. Guy get arasted for rape. Gets out in less than two years, now if you stole a chicken at a supermarket, you get forgotten inside a prison. It's pretty common here. Minor crimes get a severe punishment and violent crimes no.That’s not what he said. I doubt anyone thinks 2.5 years was long enough. But one example doesn’t tilt the scales. How many people do you think went to prison the year he did? I’m sure you can find countless examples of people getting absurd sentences for relatively minor offenses.
Sounds similar to here then- Brazil. Guy get arasted for rape. Gets out in less than two years, now if you stole a chicken at a supermarket, you get forgotten inside a prison. It's pretty common here. Minor crimes get a severe punishment and violent crimes no.
Now if you're rich you can comit any crime.
Yeah pretty much. Compared to most countries.So in your opinion that number suggests that America is awesome at solving crime... And nothing else?
Yay Canada. They are awesome also. They definitely got their own growing problems though.America has a murder solve rate of 50%, one of the lowest in the developed world. Canada, for example, has 75%. If Canada is 50% better at solving, why are only 107 per 100,000
A huge problem is the lengthy sentences in the US. Really inflates the incarceration totals.Canadians incarcerated as opposed to 541 per 100,000 in the United States?
“48%” Brazil what??? I assure you the solve/capture rate of Brazil is NOT anywhere near 48%.Some of these numbers may be off a little as I'm dealing with a mix of murder stats and general crime stats, but the general trend is overwhelming.
Brazil currently has a national average of 48%, but they've had much lower. Right now they're about the same as you.
America has 5% of the world population and 25% of incarcerated citizens.
You have problems, but being "soft on crime" isn't one of them.
Incarceration means nothing if the criminal gets out after a couple of months. That's what "soft on crime" is referring to.
You even have the context of the initial post that talks about a 2.5 year sentence for rape. How do you not understand this concept?
"Why did he rape?" would be a retarded question though.Yes seems like an easy answer but this country is too obsessed with just punishing people and few care about the "why".
I agree, but taking the most extreme singular example of a crime where the why doesnt really matter (as it doesnt with most violent crimes) or is self-evident is also a retarded point. The why Im referring to isnt simply why a singular person committed a crime, its the prevalence of a specific crime and where."Why did he rape?" would be a retarded question though.