- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 61,991
- Reaction score
- 16,744
"Idle hands are the devil's workshop."
- Sir Kenneth of Florini, 1389
Surely there are three? Strawberry, vanilla and chocolate, all from the Neapolitan tubs.
Then again, mint is nice, same as coffee, honeycomb, bubblegum etc...
So many things wrong with him starting with neopolitan isn’t a flavor but the three previous (does he even parsimony?) and ending in maple walnut.
I guess if you’re Brazilian you might think passionfruit is the apple of fruits but then he gets all ethnocentric with his denial of the greatness mocha chip and peppermint and all that jazz.
you sure make a lot of hilarious assumptions.
![]()
says the guy who lives to meme.Yawn. Juat another boring liberal tgat doesn't stand for anything.
that's precisely why PUAH8 started- they were bitter former PUA students and realized these tactics dont work if youre ugly- despite the lies and marketing of these PUA coaches. This is also the beginning of the Red Pill movement when they had to accept the fact that gimmicky pickup tactics can not compensate for shitty genetics. All these movements are reactions to PUA and the failure of its teachings.
USA's dirty little secret is that ultra right wing Christian conservatives are mirror images of ultra right wing Muslim conservatives. We have a real hate problem spreading here, and the people perpetuating it will never possess the self-analytical skills to understand they are behaving exactly like those "others" they hate in that other religion across the pond.
That's the part that makes all sentiment the same.though of course I'm inclined to think that ours are close to the truth.
That's the part that makes all sentiment the same.
Half of the war room and 80% of the video game section
It's my fault for leading you to believe I referred to the specifically political aspect when I was more commenting how most conversation gets reduced to debate rhetoric, ergo friction begetting conflict, on the presumption we are correct while they are less so. Our common selves take a wrongheaded approach of failing to even entertain disparate notions.Well it's not entirely sentiment, I just didn't want to weigh my post down with the actual reasons (especially in the apolitical subforum).
”twenty-six by my count!”The guy was dead serious about Maple WAlnut. He's like, "Everyone knows that Maple Walnut is a staple ice cream flavor! What's wrong with you?".
Better yet, he was convinced the only reason Baskin robbins was in financial trouble is that they had 'too many flavors of ice cream!".

That’s because new wave feminism has killed marriage and the American familyFunny thing is most of the conservative guys in the WR are married and most of the libs are single.
The current incel movement absolutely came out of PUA culture. There was a notorious forum called PUAH8 where bitter men discussed how futile PUA is if you're ugly. This evolved into a codified set of rules and lingo to quantify the parameters of attractiveness -canthal tilt, gonial angle, midface ratio, etc. (They have something called the fhwr coeffecient which measures the ratio of width to length of midface).
ex,![]()
They can quantify why Sean O'Pry is attractive while Gosling is not:
![]()
![]()
as I was saying, this is the community that radicalized Elliot Rodger and why that site was eventually taken down. It has now returned in a milder form as lookism.net.
![]()
The incel community is a subset of this but they have accepted they will NEVER be genetically competitive and choose to lay down and rot instead of striving for hope and being dissapointed when it fails.
Anytime I'm not currently getting laid I'm an Incel right? I mean I always want to be having sex. I'm not exactly sure of the definition. It should be included in your opener. I'm at work right now being an Incel. Life is good.
The current incel movement absolutely came out of PUA culture. There was a notorious forum called PUAH8 where bitter men discussed how futile PUA is if you're ugly. This evolved into a codified set of rules and lingo to quantify the parameters of attractiveness -canthal tilt, gonial angle, midface ratio, etc. (They have something called the fhwr coeffecient which measures the ratio of width to length of midface).
ex,![]()
They can quantify why Sean O'Pry is attractive while Gosling is not:
![]()
![]()
as I was saying, this is the community that radicalized Elliot Rodger and why that site was eventually taken down. It has now returned in a milder form as lookism.net.
![]()
The incel community is a subset of this but they have accepted they will NEVER be genetically competitive and choose to lay down and rot instead of striving for hope and being dissapointed when it fails.
I certainly agree that the current breed of incels grew out of PUA philosophy, but more as a dark offshoot than a direct lineage.
Pick-up was never about calculating facial ratios. It was about pressing buttons, and especially about how anyone remotely informed - regardless of whatever disadvantageous attributes - could do it with some degree of success.
(Otherwise it wouldn't be much of a business)
because that's a Cope:
Cope is what you do to try to ‘fix’ your inceldom. You cannot be fixed, anything you attempt to improve is just a coping mechanism. This can include exercise (gymcels), career (richcels) or trying to look better (looksmaxing). None of these things work if you are a truecel (which is almost always referring to an ugly face or short frame — blamed on bad genetics). Coping mechanisms can also simply be staying alive. That’s a cope to many incels. Just staying alive.
It's my fault for leading you to believe I referred to the specifically political aspect when I was more commenting how most conversation gets reduced to debate rhetoric, ergo friction begetting conflict, on the presumption we are correct while they are less so. Our common selves take a wrongheaded approach of failing to even entertain disparate notions.