Opinion Do people really like Adolf Hitler?

[WiolentOne]

It's sorta like Osama Bin Laden. Im rational and mature enough to agree with his critique of America's foreign policy while simultaneously disagreeing with 9/11.

Liberals are emotional bitches who just can't comprehend how that is possible.

In that regard, libs are really not much different than retarded bible thumping neocons who view the world as black and white. As GWB once said, "you're either with us or against us."

Silly triggered bitches.

 

[Possum Jenkins]

and @Madmick


First let me just set the record straight. I don’t particularly “like” Hitler, nor do I have posters of him on my wall …nor do I swear allegiance to the local chapter of the Aryan Nation. I’m not even white.

Obviously, he was a morally reprehensible human being who carried out some of the worst crimes against humanity.

That being said, there are definitely aspects of his history and personality I do admire, as well as his accomplishments. Similar to how I respect certain qualities of Osama bin Laden

What he accomplished was astonishing…turning a broke country, crushed in its morale….to becoming a local superpower in the span of less than a decade.

I mean, I love how he pissed on the Versailles Treaty and told all of his debtors (England, France etc) to fuck off, and defied the French by marching on the Rhineland…

I loved how he preached to the German people that they were the salt of the earth, and not to be ashamed of who you are. (complete 180 from their politicians today)

And how can you not admire his ambition…annexing Austria, the rest of Czechoslovakia after taking the Sudetland, attacking Britain…destroying France in less than a week…and of course…his hamartia…invading Russian in the dead of winter.

I also loved his “fuck yous” to his enemies…like mounting a swastika on the Eifel Tower…having the French sign their surrender in the rail car…

Lol at this stupid shit. Admiring aggression and violence is illegitimate in every single sense. But somehow it's kinda neat when done at the largest scale.

By these standards, Bin Laden or any ISIS or al-Qaeda high official is admirable.

Hitler took a military superpower and invaded other superpowers. Bin Laden took a few hundred fanatics from dirt poor countries and organized a series of attacks on the largest power in the history of the world. Took down a major landmark and coaxed them into a trillion dollar war. Admirable!

ISIS beat the shit out of the Iraqi army, a group funded and trained by the richest and most powerful nation on earth. Pretty impressive!

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

It's sorta like Osama Bin Laden. Im rational and mature enough to agree with his critique of America's foreign policy while simultaneously disagreeing with 9/11.

Liberals are emotional bitches who just can't comprehend how that is possible.

In that regard, libs are really not much different than retarded bible thumping neocons who view the world as black and white. As GWB once said, "you're either with us or against us."

Silly triggered bitches.

You may have become my new favourite poster.

 

[TheGreatA]

Lol at this stupid shit. Admiring aggression and violence is illegitimate in every single sense. But somehow it's kinda neat when done at the largest scale.

By these standards, Bin Laden or any ISIS or al-Qaeda high official is admirable.

Hitler took a military superpower and invaded other superpowers. Bin Laden took a few hundred fanatics from dirt poor countries and organized a series of attacks on the largest power in the history of the world. Took down a major landmark and coaxed them into a trillion dollar war. Admirable!

ISIS beat the shit out of the Iraqi army, a group funded and trained by the richest and most powerful nation on earth. Pretty impressive!

These feats can be regarded as impressive regardless of whether they were done in the name of good or evil.

If ISIS were fighting for justice and self-determination from an oppressive regime (a Saddam Hussein, for example), their feats would also have been impressive.

ISIS are beheading jihadist scum, and the Nazis were genocidal and anti-human. This does not mean that they cannot have achieved great feats, which we could only wish had been done in the name of a greater cause.

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

These feats can be regarded as impressive regardless of whether they were done in the name of good or evil.

If ISIS were fighting for justice and self-determination from an oppressive regime (a Saddam Hussein, for example), their feats would also have been impressive.

ISIS are beheading jihadist scum, and the Nazis were genocidal and anti-human. This does not mean that they cannot have achieved great feats, which we could only wish had been done in the name of a greater cause.

I'm glad that at least some people get it..

 

[ZyklonBob]

If you're hated by the Jews, you're probably doing something right.

Look at What's happened to the West. Do you not think Jews are behind it? Cultral Marxism? Diversity is strength? How about the moral decline? Jews own the mass media, it's not corporate media it is JEWISH.

Jews are not friends of our people. Why should I be friends of people who plot our destruction?

This is the problem with the White race. We are divided. We were at eachothers throats killing eachother at WW2. Blinded by our hatred of the Germans, we didn't see that we may have been shooting ourselves in the foot.

 

[dontsnitch]

Maybe but if you don't have sigs disabled you're a cuck bitch. Ain't nobody got time for that.

But how will you know which are my favorite fighters?

 

[Possum Jenkins]

These feats can be regarded as impressive regardless of whether they were done in the name of good or evil.

If ISIS were fighting for justice and self-determination from an oppressive regime (a Saddam Hussein, for example), their feats would also have been impressive.

ISIS are beheading jihadist scum, and the Nazis were genocidal and anti-human. This does not mean that they cannot have achieved great feats, which we could only wish had been done in the name of a greater cause.

Yeah, but if a week ago someone had seriously asked "do you like ISIS?" it'd have gotten laughed off. Meanwhile, this thread has 500+ posts discussing the nuances of Hitler's accomplishments.

But even within this context, ISIS/Bin Laden have a better argument for being admirable than the Nazis. They're responsible for far less killings and their excuses for violence (the West is attacking Muslim land) holds more water than the Nazis' (the West is against them).

 

[TheGreatA]

Yeah, but if a week ago someone had seriously asked "do you like ISIS?" it'd have gotten laughed off. Meanwhile, this thread has 500+ posts discussing the nuances of Hitler's accomplishments.

But even within this context, ISIS/Bin Laden have a better argument for being admirable than the Nazis. They're responsible for far less killings and their excuses for violence (the West is attacking Muslim land) holds more water than the Nazis' (the West is against them).

They are responsible for less killings because they have less capacities for killing. I have no doubt that their ideology would be as destructive as that of the Nazis, if it were more successful.

The Nazis did not actually kill too many people in the West. Most of their killings were done in the East, while fighting against an enemy which may very well have been the most proficient killing machine in human history.

 

[Oiler]

If you're hated by the Jews, you're probably doing something right.

Look at What's happened to the West. Do you not think Jews are behind it? Cultral Marxism? Diversity is strength? How about the moral decline? Jews own the mass media, it's not corporate media it is JEWISH.

Jews are not friends of our people. Why should I be friends of people who plot our destruction?

This is the problem with the White race. We are divided. We were at eachothers throats killing eachother at WW2. Blinded by our hatred of the Germans, we didn't see that we may have been shooting ourselves in the foot.

Does your family know you hold these views? Very sick stuff.

 

[AgedFlatus]

Fucking L-O-L, " errrmagawd! Nazi!!!!11!"

 

[ZyklonBob]

Why was there a Holocaust of Jews, but not Slavs?

The ethnic origin of Bolshevism, Communism and the revolution in Russia was Jewish

They were even trying to spark a revolution in Germany.

Be honest, if it were not for what the Jews were doing none of this would have happened..


Like all Jewish involvement in crime, it is covered up and labelled hate speech.

No wonder people are so ignorant when the Jews work tersely to suppress free speech in the Western world. Jews are only allowed to viewed as victims, not villains.

Even the Armenian genocide had a Jewish involvement to it that's actually been written about by Israeli historians. Seems Isreali's have more free speech than the West where say a professor at a university would be fired for mentioning it.

Why do they do it?

They're like the puppet masters, engineering this conflicts and wars..

The Jews are not divided like others they are like one united people but it's not like they live in one country their population is spread out but even in countries that have thousands of Jews, you'll find the usual oligarch's there. Jewish money has a huge influence in politics. Hillary Clinton's top donors were all Jews. She was even backed by most neo-cons, again Jews...

 

[Blackened]

If you're hated by the Jews, you're probably doing something right.

Look at What's happened to the West. Do you not think Jews are behind it? Cultral Marxism? Diversity is strength? How about the moral decline? Jews own the mass media, it's not corporate media it is JEWISH.

Jews are not friends of our people. Why should I be friends of people who plot our destruction?

This is the problem with the White race. We are divided. We were at eachothers throats killing eachother at WW2. Blinded by our hatred of the Germans, we didn't see that we may have been shooting ourselves in the foot.

Well, let's be clear. There is a distinction between integrated Jewish people and those pushing international Jewry.

Fuck, even Hitler's body guard was Jewish, made like 20 Jews "honorary Aryans" due to their loyalty to the Third Reich. You really can't blame all Jews for this the same way you can't blame all Muslims for terrorist attacks.

But I agree, it is startling. Despite being 2% of the U.S. population, 48% of U.S. billionaires are Jewish.

 

[TheGreatA]

They are responsible for less killings because they have less capacities for killing. I have no doubt that their ideology would be as destructive as that of the Nazis, if it were more successful.

The Nazis did not actually kill too many people in the West. Most of their killings were done in the East, while fighting against an enemy which may very well have been the most proficient killing machine in human history.

To reinforce the last point:

Russian Civil War: 10+ million casualties
Famine of 1921: 5 million dead (atleast partially as a result of "War Communism")
Gulags: Atleast 2 million deaths (lowest estimation)
Polish-Soviet War: hundreds of thousands of casualties
Holodomor: 5+ million starved to death (estimated 10 million in demographic loss)
The Great Purge: 1+ million dead
NKVD massacres: hundreds of thousands executed
Soviet war against Finns: hundreds of thousands of casualties
"Great Patriotic War": Nearly 30 million casualties
Soviet mass rapes: hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of victims
Soviet invasion of Manchuria: tens of thousands of casualties, mass rape/looting afterwards

etc.

Nazis, were at best, the little brother of the Soviet Union as far as their ability to commit massacres, which spawned as a response to the original.

 

[sangreporsangre]

Why was there a Holocaust of Jews, but not Slavs?

The ethnic origin of Bolshevism, Communism and the revolution in Russia was Jewish

They were even trying to spark a revolution in Germany.

Be honest, if it were not for what the Jews were doing none of this would have happened..


Like all Jewish involvement in crime, it is covered up and labelled hate speech.

No wonder people are so ignorant when the Jews work tersely to suppress free speech in the Western world. Jews are only allowed to viewed as victims, not villains.

Even the Armenian genocide had a Jewish involvement to it that's actually been written about by Israeli historians. Seems Isreali's have more free speech than the West where say a professor at a university would be fired for mentioning it.

Why do they do it?

They're like the puppet masters, engineering this conflicts and wars..

The Jews are not divided like others they are like one united people but it's not like they live in one country their population is spread out but even in countries that have thousands of Jews, you'll find the usual oligarch's there. Jewish money has a huge influence in politics. Hillary Clinton's top donors were all Jews. She was even backed by most neo-cons, again Jews...

You've had so many accounts here, and always the same crap. Pretty soon you're gonna start spamming those videos of the former Jewish guy talking shit in front of that gorgeous mountain backdrop. It's not the Jew's fault that your life is a failure.

 

[sangreporsangre]

To reinforce the last point:

Russian Civil War: 10+ million casualties
Famine of 1921: 5 million dead (atleast partially as a result of "War Communism")
Gulags: Atleast 2 million deaths (lowest estimation)
Polish-Soviet War: hundreds of thousands of casualties
Holodomor: 5+ million starved to death (estimated 10 million in demographic loss)
The Great Purge: 1+ million dead
NKVD massacres: hundreds of thousands executed
Soviet war against Finns: hundreds of thousands of casualties
"Great Patriotic War": Nearly 30 million casualties
Soviet mass rapes: hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of victims
Soviet invasion of Manchuria: tens of thousands of casualties, mass rape/looting afterwards

etc.

Nazis, were at best, the little brother of the Soviet Union as far as their ability to commit massacres, which spawned as a response to the original.

Yea but the guy you were talking to before doesn't seem to consider violence committed by leftist regimes as a bad thing though. The way he was fawning over Castro when he croaked would have been enough to make Trudeau blush. Can't create a Marxist utopia without breaking a few eggs.

 

[Fawlty]

The funny thing is that the admiration (shudder) for Hitler's "good" things nearly always comes in the form of apology. If the people doing this did not have an affinity for Hitler, it would more often take the form of caution. Subtle things like how the "good" acts as a Trojan horse for atrocity in a troubled society, or using the Hitler lesson to show where and how good intentions diverge from bad ones. The only thing you'll find like that is people saying that the holocaust was wrong, but they will usually apologize by mentioning supply lines or something.

It's so transparent and shameful.

 

[Supereem]

One could pretty much name the 16 nazi sympathizers that have voted yes before even checking.





They Nazis were far right, that´s all there is to it.

While they did have some common ground with socialist ideology in the beginning that quickly shifted to very far right positions.



Sure they pretty much never changed their 25 point plan from 1921 but from the 30s and onwards they certainly were not a "socialist" party.. Hell they privatized a large portion of public services ip through the 30s.

Their magical drop in unemployment through the 30s was also completely fudging the numbers.

Define left and right.

 

[Oiler]

That would be a very simplistic take of course.

How about another example. In school we are largely taught that the mighty USA strolled into WWII and won the war punctuated with the unveiling of the atomic bomb which was a prudent decision to end the war quickly and ultimately save lives that would be lost in a drawn out war.

Go 'merica, WE ROCK!

Except not really, the pacific war was a certainty especially with Russia's involvement on the west side essentially encircling Japan's already completely depleted forces.

No, Mr "negroes were made from mud" Harry Truman nuked two Japanese cities because he wanted the surrender to be on the USA's terms and they didn't want to make concessions to the Russians on the region, it also served as a short lived big stick swing to the Russians... like, seeee this is what WE got.

In the meantime we managed to incinerate a couple civilian populations... meh, they don't look like us, aren't real people... don't matter. It blows me away that more people aren't ASHAMED of that... but instead they wear it like a badge of pride. It would certainly be reasonable that some people might see that act as "evil" right? Harry Truman, president sociopath.

I get that this doubles as weak, liberal revisionist history etc... and I'm not that guy. I'm just saying that we learn things in a manner that isn't always true and distorts the reality of events.

Where does personal responsibility for being a killer come in?

 

[Limbo Pete]

The funny thing is that the admiration (shudder) for Hitler's "good" things nearly always comes in the form of apology. If the people doing this did not have an affinity for Hitler, it would more often take the form of caution. Subtle things like how the "good" acts as a Trojan horse for atrocity in a troubled society, or using the Hitler lesson to show where and how good intentions diverge from bad ones. The only thing you'll find like that is people saying that the holocaust was wrong, but they will usually apologize by mentioning supply lines or something.

It's so transparent and shameful.

It starts out imo with "I'm just trying to get a more comprehensive picture than what is in our biased liberal textbooks", then goes to stuff with phrases like "International Jewry" and from there onto "Well, you know the idea wasn't wrong, it just went too far." Sprinkle in faux outrage and comparisons to other genocides.