Do people give credit to weidman

Completely irrelevant to what I said.

It is relevant. You told that reality will match Weidman's championship claims if he wins more.
Well, news flash: reality already matches it, because the guy he's recently beat is doing very well. Hence, so does Weidman.
 
It is relevant. You told that reality will match Weidman's championship claims if he wins more.
Well, news flash: reality already matches it, because the guy he's recently beat is doing very well. Hence, so does Weidman.

What championship claims? You said that, I said, "his place in the division"
 
The Weidman hate goes both ways though. When Weidman dethroned Silva and beat him in the rematch. People were already calling him the MW goat; the Weidman hype was off the charts at one point. Some even claimed he could move up and take LHW gold.
 
Good win. He got wobbled hard at the end of the 1st but good recovery
 
Anybody that can match and or beat Weidman’s size or strength beats him.

Look at all of Weidman’s wins. He either had a clear size and or strength over all his opponents.
 
It was a great win. Kelvin has been on a tear in middleweight, so I don't see how you wouldn't give credit to Weidman because he has a larger frame. Everyone else at MW has had the same advantages yet lost. However I do feel Kelvin wasn't fully committed to beating him for some reason.
why do you say he wasnt committed?
 
Anybody that can match and or beat Weidman’s size or strength beats him.

Look at all of Weidman’s wins. He either had a clear size and or strength over all his opponents.

1fa6bb7bc1255ff25394f032e5c8e88d.jpg
 
Make up your damn mind already. He's either good at 185 and worthy of a title shot or he doesn't belong because he lost to freakin Chris Weidman.
 
Back
Top