- Joined
- Jun 17, 2023
- Messages
- 11,228
- Reaction score
- 18,889
yeah its people who don't suck massive amounts of cockWait now, there are football fans claiming Brady isn't the greatest quarterback of all-time?
yeah its people who don't suck massive amounts of cockWait now, there are football fans claiming Brady isn't the greatest quarterback of all-time?
I can't speak to your sexual preferences champ, just your low IQ.yeah its people who don't suck massive amounts of cock
No, you literally posted
I never said nobody should run the 40 because it means nothing, you said that. I said who gives a shit about his fast his 40 time was. He's a QB, his primary job is to protect the football and get it to his play makers. Being mobile is the least valuable trait a QB has more often than not.
Consensus of retards is still retarded, you apparently don't get that.
I talk pretty close to how I post and it's never been a problem. The real question is why does my language impact you in any way? I mean yeah, I'm calling you retarded, which can be irksome. I don't think you're actually a retard though. It's vernacular used to paint a picture of how uninformed and ridiculous your positions are.
I am totally fine with you having these absurd positions too, but the moment they are posted on sherdog they are open to be ridiculed. Plenty of shit I've said has been ridiculed and I'm okay with it. Luckily I'm a great football mind and my takes generally end up being right.
Hard to believe isn't it?Wait now, there are football fans claiming Brady isn't the greatest quarterback of all-time?
Anybody denying it is simply an attention seeking weirdo.Hard to believe isn't it?
Actually Betty White and Tim Tebow were better,.
I figured that out, but do confess.....took awhile.Anybody denying it is simply an attention seeking weirdo.
Generally homosexuals can't speak on heterosexual preferences so that goes without saying.I can't speak to your sexual preferences champ, just your low IQ.
LOL, had no doubts it would come from a fraud like yourself.
It doesn't matter for him, it doesn't matter in most cases. Whether or not it matters is dependent on many things, one is you don't want guys who are just slow. So if they run a 4.3 or 4.6 it generally doesn't matter if they're good at playing football, and it generally doesn't reflect to football speed, which is vastly different than track speed. It really is overrated as a metric. The GOAT WR is Jerry Rice and he ran a 4.7. He may be an outlier, but its proven that the best of all time at a position that the 40 is supposed to represent the most, is irrelevant. Mike Evans ran a 4.53 or something but he plays fast, is physical and runs great routes. Route running, break speed, and hands means more than some shitty 40 time. It's proven all the time in the NFL.So you do see the 40 important, you did say......who gives a shit. So......which is it?
You seem to take this......either agree with me or you're a........hahahahaha~
What absurdity? Russell Wilson who you apparently don't know anything about. If you did know about his career you'd agree with me. Do some workwork.
I don't cuss, don't call people names, so when you talk to me be cool, would appreciate it. Key word......mature.
So you're random subjective list of ideals.....completely left field to the general punditry of the sport.Anybody denying Brady GOAT status is simply smart enough to evaluate actual talent.
Just go to the Ravens and trade Lmr for 2 firsts imowith Milshit's 40 time he should just transition to RB since he fucking sucks. Raiders probably will still trade back into the last firt round and take him.
Andrew Luck was a better QB than Tom Brady and if you disagree you're a moron. Unironically troglodyte stupid. That doesn't mean Brady was bad, or that Brady didn't have a better career.So you're random subjective list of ideals.....completely left field to the general punditry of the sport.
Got it. What was I thinking?
It's literally now impossible to take anything you'll ever post on the subject of the sport seriously.Andrew Luck was a better QB than Tom Brady and if you disagree you're a moron. Unironically troglodyte stupid. That doesn't mean Brady was bad, or that Brady didn't have a better career.
Right, can't take the fact Andrew Luck was a better arm talent, stronger arm, better pocket presence, more mobile, better pre-snap reads, better post snap production on broken plays, all that shit, he definitely wasnt better than Brady.It's literally now impossible to take anything you'll ever post on the subject of the sport seriously.
This is why I previously referred to you as a "fraud".
Why did Rice slip in the draft, yep.......4,7.Generally homosexuals can't speak on heterosexual preferences so that goes without saying.
I don't know how I'm a fraud, but hey alright.
It doesn't matter for him, it doesn't matter in most cases. Whether or not it matters is dependent on many things, one is you don't want guys who are just slow. So if they run a 4.3 or 4.6 it generally doesn't matter if they're good at playing football, and it generally doesn't reflect to football speed, which is vastly different than track speed. It really is overrated as a metric. The GOAT WR is Jerry Rice and he ran a 4.7. He may be an outlier, but its proven that the best of all time at a position that the 40 is supposed to represent the most, is irrelevant. Mike Evans ran a 4.53 or something but he plays fast, is physical and runs great routes. Route running, break speed, and hands means more than some shitty 40 time. It's proven all the time in the NFL.
You're still on Rustle Wilson who doesn't even have a job right now because nobody wants him but hes a top 15 QB of all time lmao
I don't give a shit what you do, you conduct yourself how you want to conduct yourself. You still have shitty takes.
Rice was still in the first round, Al Toon ran a 4.65 and Eddie Brown ran a 4.27 (cooked number and 2nd WR drafted). It wasnt 40 times and they were all first round WR's. The reason WR's dropped is because in 1985 WR's werent as valuable as running backs.Why did Rice slip in the draft, yep.......4,7.
Wilson is 36 years old, that is a real big deal. But.......his career is without questionna top 15 all time and if you knew his career you'd see that, dude......bone up on his career, you are ignorant about it. The guy just made his 10th pro bowl, in just 13 seasons, who does that?
That 40 time is a real big deal if it wasn't they wouldn't bother with it. Two WR's you are debating about one runs 4.35 the other 4.55 guess who gets picked?
Seen a lot of football, can talk guys you have never heard of, my takes come with a TON of experience and ya don;t have to deal with.....fuck, shit, you retard......that's how kids act.
* yourSo you're random subjective list of ideals.....completely left field to the general punditry of the sport.
Got it. What was I thinking?
Rice was still in the first round, Al Toon ran a 4.65 and Eddie Brown ran a 4.27 (cooked number and 2nd WR drafted). It wasnt 40 times and they were all first round WR's. The reason WR's dropped is because in 1985 WR's werent as valuable as running backs.
Right. Then there are those pesky stats.* your
Yes. General punditry is aimed for low IQ individuals who can't think for themselves and allow their opinions to be dictated by whatever narrative the punditry puts forth.