I’m not ignoring anything. Some people like you define careers based on the number you see on a piece of paper and that’s fucking stupid.
Anyone, who knows anything about sports knows the 49ers in the time purdy has been there has had an excellent O line, some of the best receivers in the league, a top 5 coaching staff, and the single best receiving running back in the modern era. Where as stafford was on one of the most abysmal franchises un NFL history during their very worst years.
Objectively, any ounce of logic tells you that if you put stafford his first three years on that same 49ers team purdy had, the results would be better in every single category.
If you ignore game footage, actual real life ability, context, team/situation, and literally everything besides a state line, sure, I can agree. But anything and everything else points to Stafford by a mile and I don’t get what you’re struggling with on this one.