- Joined
- Aug 15, 2025
- Messages
- 12
- Reaction score
- 11
I need help understanding this.
On the surface, it stands to reason that if you can do, let's say, 20 perfect hanging leg raises with legs straight, full ROM and no swaying, even for multiple sets, or if you can do toes-to-bar or even windshield wipers, all while hanging, that your core should essentially be as close to impenetrable as possible against the force of body shots.
Yet, somehow, this often isn't the case.
Even though you reach the capacity to tighten up the 'corset' of core muscles as much as possible, to thicken up the padding of it and to maintain this with as little fatigue as possible, somehow, most people still get worn down easily from body shots.
Why is that?
How is it that such a huge dichotomy can exist between core strength when working out and core strength when fighting, between abs being under put huge amounts of strain via one thing versus another thing? It makes no sense to me.
Please keep answers respectful, please.
On the surface, it stands to reason that if you can do, let's say, 20 perfect hanging leg raises with legs straight, full ROM and no swaying, even for multiple sets, or if you can do toes-to-bar or even windshield wipers, all while hanging, that your core should essentially be as close to impenetrable as possible against the force of body shots.
Yet, somehow, this often isn't the case.
Even though you reach the capacity to tighten up the 'corset' of core muscles as much as possible, to thicken up the padding of it and to maintain this with as little fatigue as possible, somehow, most people still get worn down easily from body shots.
Why is that?
How is it that such a huge dichotomy can exist between core strength when working out and core strength when fighting, between abs being under put huge amounts of strain via one thing versus another thing? It makes no sense to me.
Please keep answers respectful, please.