Did Trump set up Comey?

Ah yes.. thats why Trump is shook as fuck threatening Comey via twitter.. all part of a 3,000,000 D chess the man who can't read is playing
 
Comey outlived his usefulness to the administration and is now seen as a liability. He had a good run.
 
Helden said:
Ah yes.. thats why Trump is shook as fuck threatening Comey via twitter.. all part of a 3,000,000 D chess the man who can't read is playing
Click to expand...
Stuff like this reminds me of the Bush era, where the some on left constantly called him a retard yet turned around and accused him of masterminding 9/11.

Clearly there's more of a likelihood of the Russia links than GWB spearheading an attack on his country and the most elaborate cover up in history, but this could just be another case of Trump being a tempormental idiot.
 
Palis said:
Is that what you were when you said that comment to me?
Click to expand...

No, I think I call you boring just about every time you highlight me.

What instance of butthurt are you referring to, I'll try to reminisce.
 
Rational Poster said:
It's logical because Trump is incompetent.

He thought it would be enough to make it go away, but he was just wrong.
Click to expand...

An atheist who got hte evangelical vote and draft dodger who got the military and veterans vote, a guy who is a billionaire, and is hte most powerful person in the world is incompetent.. Makes sense! lmao

You're just another idiot he has fooled.

Still spending all your energy looking out for that non-existent wall and Muslim ban, and missing what's behind the curtain aren't you? rofl

15-d chess
 
TheComebackKid said:
Came across an interesting theory about what is actually going on with this Trump/Comey situation.

For the full breakdown: https://theconservativetreehouse.co...missing-sally-yates-and-james-comey-timeline/

It's kind of lengthy but here is the gist:

•Tuesday January 24th – Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn was interviewed at the White House by the FBI.

•Wednesday January 25th – The Department of Justice received a detailed readout from the FBI agents who had interviewed Flynn. Yates said she felt “it was important to get this information to the White House as quickly as possible.”

......

•Friday January 27th – (late afternoon) According to her testimony, Sally Yates returned to the White House late that afternoon. One of McGahn’s topics discussed was whether Flynn could be prosecuted for his conduct.

Specifically, according to Yates, one of the questions McGahn asked Yates was, “Why does it matter to DOJ if one White House official lies to another?” She explained that it “was a whole lot more than that,” and reviewed the same issues outlined the prior day.

McGahn expressed his concern that taking action might interfere with the FBI investigation of Flynn, and Yates said it wouldn’t. “It wouldn’t really be fair of us to tell you this and then expect you to sit on your hands,” Yates had told McGahn.

•Friday January 27th – (evening) In what appears to be only a few hours later, President Trump is having dinner with FBI Director James Comey where President Trump asked if he was under investigation.

Now, accepting the politicization of the entire Russian Conspiracy Narrative that was leading the headlines for the two months prior to this dinner; and knowing moments earlier your Chief White House counsel informs you that two political operatives (Yates and Priestap) within the DOJ were providing classified intelligence reports about General Flynn; and knowing the prior months (Nov/Dec/Jan) were fraught with leaks from intelligence reports identical to those discussed; wouldn’t you perhaps think that any action you take could be utilized to add fuel to this Russian narrative? And/Or be used by these same leak facilitators to make something seem like something it is not?

Think about it.

If you were President under those circumstances, wouldn’t you ask FBI Director James Comey what the deal was with these investigations, and whether or not you were under investigation BEFORE you took action to retain or fire Mike Flynn?

......

UPDATE 7:30pm: As if on cue, THIS is the exact trap we are talking about above.

SEE? In the first paragraph of the first article to draw attention to the timeline, the accusation is made that President Trump was “interfering with an ongoing FBI investigation”.

That is exactly the trap that Director Comey, Acting AG Yates and Asst. Director of DOJ Counter Intel Priestap were laying out. Director Comey went to that dinner HOPING that Trump would ask him about Michael Flynn which would be seen as impeding a federal investigation.

For several months the media have been steadfast in their efforts to turn this into Watergate 2.0. To achieve that objective the political angle-players and media need only to paint Trump into a corner with a credible accusation of the president interfering with an FBI investigation (Flynn). Against the timeline above, as played out this week with Sally Yates testimony to congress, they were only a couple more timely misinformation leaks and twisted reports away from making that happen.

Now look at this tweet again:

trump-soldier-2.jpg





So what does the war room think...did Comey and Co attempt to entrap our President only to get out maneuvered at their own game?
Click to expand...


What does any of that have to do with asking Comey if he was loyal to Trump?

More importantly - what is the rationale for keeping Flynn in national security meetings for 18 days after finding out that he could be compromised?

To play along though: If it was a trap to get Comey- then it was done at the expense of national security which makes the view of 'Trump as a politician that would interfere with an investigation' a lot more appealing than the 'moronic Trump that would keep a compromised head of the NSA'.
 
It's hilarious how badly you guys want him to be smart contrary to everything that is just plain to the eye.

He's stupid and immature. It's not complicated. It's not a mystery.
 
Madmick said:
It's hilarious how badly you guys want him to be smart contrary to everything that is just plain to the eye.

He's stupid and immature. It's not complicated. It's not a mystery.
Click to expand...
Jordan Petterson said judging by his actions and accomplishments he's obviously very smart, a point I've made here several times. So I'll turn that plain to the eye right back around.
 
Madmick said:
It's hilarious how badly you guys want him to be smart contrary to everything that is just plain to the eye.

He's stupid and immature. It's not complicated. It's not a mystery.
Click to expand...


But nowhere near as hilarious as how absolutely nightmarish it is to you and your toadies that he might have some intelligence in that big head of his. You guys act terrified of this man, wait not act, you are; But you act and build your whole argument on your emotions and that's a death sentence in a political/logical/scientific debate. Parroting buzzwords and "end of the world" mantras like the borg doesn't help anyone on the left get things accomplished. It's fascinatingly frustrating.

Whats more astonishing is you don't even know why you're so scared of him. In regards to the topic brought up the OP @TheComebackKid does a good job of laying out a possible scenario or theory if you will. He sells it as just that, something "possible". Yet the responses are simply pathetic. When you near insanely force, sell and scream your "opinion" and feelings as the indisputable facts, you just lose all credibility making it difficult to ever have Independents and Conservatives to take you serious. No one without high level security clearance knows the truth here yet liberals can't fathom anything but what they want... Which is for everyone to believe Trump is a mentally retarded incarnation of Satan.

That's what I think and can admit that's all it is... My opinion. Liberals actions only bolster it.

Cheers dude. TC
 
I like how all the Trumplings are calling him an idiot, like you wouldn't suck his dick right now just like you did before the election. What did you fucking retards think you were going to get? Idiots.
 
It's an externalization of a recurring wet dream they have.

Farmer Br0wn said:
Can someone please explain this meme to me that liberals use instead of comming up with actual rebuttals, retorts, or counter arguments?
Click to expand...
 
second sight said:
Jordan Petterson said judging by his actions and accomplishments he's obviously very smart, a point I've made here several times. So I'll turn that plain to the eye right back around.
Click to expand...
lolz
wait you aren't joking
thats your proof?


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,025
Messages
58,336,360
Members
176,003
Latest member
HeneryH

Share this page

Back
Top