Did The Tuck get Cucked here?

Greoric

Greoric

Banned
Banned
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
16,995
Reaction score
0


His guest has the perfect point... the Scalise shooting is precisely what the practice of the 2A looks like.

What does the rest of the WR think?
 
didn't a politician get killed in the uk? and they have no 2a , if psycho want a gun they get it illegally anyway while it would be impossible for law abiding citizen
 
the screenshot is messed up for me, looks like the one guy is deformed and has massive eyes.
 
I don't know anything about tucker other than I hate his face. It's a very punch able face. And he looks like he has no teeth. I cannot support him. Weird, toothless punch-face fucker.
 
I asked this question to someone a few weeks ago who was arguing the second amendment was to guard against a tyrannical government. Who decides when the government is at that point?
 
If snowflakes don't get rubbers & IUD's for free, then that is a tyrannical government, to them. Ship these liberal aholes to North Korea to experience what a real " tyrannical" government is.
 
That's precisely what the Tea Party morons claim the second amendment means, but in practice, they don't believe a word of it.
 
Tuck pretty much cucked himself arguing as a partisan. The guest does make the perfect point. Its the first thing that came to mind when the news broke.
 
Fawlty said:
That's precisely what the Tea Party morons claim the second amendment means, but in practice, they don't believe a word of it.
Click to expand...

You may be in for a surprise. Just keep in mind they make an extreme minority. Some say only around 3% of the population. ;)
 
Diamond Jim said:
I asked this question to someone a few weeks ago who was arguing the second amendment was to guard against a tyrannical government. Who decides when the government is at that point?
Click to expand...
This question has nothing to do with the second amendment.
It's a philosophical question ever since.
At which point was it legitimate to resist Hitler?
Should North Koreans revolt against Kim Dong Dong?

The question when it's the case has nothing to do with the availability of guns once it is the case.
Those are two isolated questions.
Or are you hinting at the argument that it's actually never legit to resist a government?
 
Tuck got the shit cucked out of him.The second amendment is there to protect against a tyrannical government, but you are only allowed to use it for larping.
 
WiolentOne said:
You may be in for a surprise. Just keep in mind they make an extreme minority. Some say only around 3% of the population. ;)
Click to expand...
If we didn't do it after the patriot act and its spawn, I don't think we ever will. We literally don't have any privacy, and the government has full authority to secretly do absolutely anything without any disclosure or oversight. The only thing preventing the whole shithouse coming down is that nobody in charge actually has Stalin-like intentions or is willing to invoke the powers already available, but we are absolutely ripe for the plucking if a new Stalin comes along. The fabric is at maximum stretch right now. And this is why it's important that we not destroy all of our norms, which are actually the glue holding our society together- gentlemen's agreements- not law.
 
lecter said:
This question has nothing to do with the second amendment.
It's a philosophical question ever since.
At which point was it legitimate to resist Hitler?
Should North Koreans revolt against Kim Dong Dong?

The question when it's the case has nothing to do with the availability of guns once it is the case.
Those are two isolated questions.
Or are you hinting at the argument that it's actually never legit to resist a government?
Click to expand...

This is an older vid - one we discussed a couple years back in the WR.

I recommend everyone watch it.

During the interview he responds to the questions relatively calm, measured and with open ended answers. He even expressed his unsurety. But when asked a question about gun confiscation with a specific scenario at 330 he responds with conviction. That's his line in the sand. That's his Hitler.

 
Last edited:
I didn't watch the video, but I'd say yes.
 
lecter said:
This question has nothing to do with the second amendment.
It's a philosophical question ever since.
At which point was it legitimate to resist Hitler?
Should North Koreans revolt against Kim Dong Dong?

The question when it's the case has nothing to do with the availability of guns once it is the case.
Those are two isolated questions.
Or are you hinting at the argument that it's actually never legit to resist a government?
Click to expand...

No, I'm asking who determines it when it's actually legal and necessary to resist the government?
 
Greoric said:


His guest has the perfect point... the Scalise shooting is precisely what the practice of the 2A looks like.

What does the rest of the WR think?
Click to expand...


Carlson got curb stomped hard.

Continually attempted to do an end around a very direct, straightforward question because he knew his answer would immediately place him in the center of a pit of quicksand.

What is the basis under which we as citizens can rightfully take up arms against the US government and her agents?
 
Diamond Jim said:
No, I'm asking who determines it when it's actually legal and necessary to resist the government?
Click to expand...
But that question has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment or the argument that the 2nd amendment can be useful once you made that decision.

A point to make that more clear:
The constitutions of some nations explicitly declare a right to resistance against a tyrannical government, effectively saying hey if we ever turn evil, you should resist.
At the same time, they have very strict gun laws.
So a citizen still has to answer the difficult question: Well, and when exactly can I legitimately resist, I mean we have very different views on politics?
The argument if he should or shouldn't be able to own guns to use them once he made that decision is irrelevant to that question.
It's a distinct problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,283,044
Messages
58,478,028
Members
176,048
Latest member
gibberish

Share this page

Back
Top