Did The Tuck get Cucked here?

Why would it? Less resources are being consumed by a grossly inefficient institution.

Whether you regard fiscal policy as "theft" (obviously redefining that word) is irrelevant to what you list as the defining aspect of morality here. You can't see that you're drawing from opposing ideas here?
 
Whether you regard fiscal policy as "theft" (obviously redefining that word) is irrelevant to what you list as the defining aspect of morality here. You can't see that you're drawing from opposing ideas here?

Not really, but that's another strawman. I never brought that reasoning up. Care to defend the efficiency gains of a compulsory funded monopoly over a decentralized and regulatory burden free market?
 
Not really, but that's another strawman. I never brought that reasoning up. Care to defend the efficiency gains of a compulsory funded monopoly over a decentralized and regulatory burden free market?

I'm really wondering what you think "strawman" is. Sounds like you just drop it when you see a point you can't handle. There's not even a hint of a strawman anywhere there. There's no such thing as a "decentralized and regulatory-burden-free market."

Why do you keep bringing up this bitch Molyneux for? Stay focused.

Because you're just parroting his stuff constantly. Even your insults. It would be easier if you just linked some of your favorite arguments of his.
 
Back
Top