Says the one with BJ Penn in as the avatar.
PS: It seems a doubly strange and troll-like observation to make in this instance, because my point was that Weidman didn't underestimate Rockhold, he was beaten fair and square by the better man. Similarly, when BJ Penn lost the rematch to Georges St Pierre, when BJ lost the rematch to Frankie Edgar, and so on, it wasn't because BJ underestimated them, it was because they were the better technical fighters on the night, GSP was bigger, fitter, stronger, better strategically, more rounded, more varied, etc. BJ knew it was his biggest test, but it wouldn't have mattered even if he had underestimated GSP, or overestimated him, or estimated him perfectly accurately - because GSP was just a better 170lbs fighter than BJ was.
I can readily and easily admit this, because it was obviously true, even though I hated watching BJ get mauled like that. You see, this is what is called 'objectivity'.
Can you admit the same about Rockhold-Weidman? I didn't think so. Because you are a troll. Congratulations.