• We are requiring that all users add Two-Step Verification (2FA) to their accounts, as found here: https://forums.sherdog.com/account/security Within one week, we will automatically set this up, so please make the necessary arrangements. Reach out to an admin if you encounter issues, and we apologize for any inconvenience.

Did 60s-era bodybuilder Larry Scott have the best physique of all time?

Trying to look like bradley martyn minus the juice, think its possible?

F2mfRGY.jpg


bradley-martyn-swole.jpg


bradley-martyn-transformation-1.png
 
In my opinion,most awesome classic-era BB'er goes to The Myth himself, Sergio Oliva:


serigo-myth.jpg

sergio-oliva-bicep.jpg
I agree with you saying Sergio Oliva. He was the best IMO. Most powerful looking physique. And I think hands down best proportions. I don't think anyone touches him.
 
Trying to look like bradley martyn minus the juice, think its possible?

F2mfRGY.jpg


bradley-martyn-swole.jpg


bradley-martyn-transformation-1.png


JFC, so obviously juiced and i bet everyone knows it. It's not even possible for someone like him to get Shoulders that wide. LOL at his jaw and face structure looks pure juice status also.
 
Today's bodybuilder physique is good if you compete in bodybuilding . . . because judges have gone retarded. They basically just started handing out wins to the guys who were the biggest and most vascular, and so the race to becoming as massive as possible with paper thin skin began, even though that leads to dudes who look terrible.

Today's physique competitors look a lot better than today's actual bodybuilders.


patrick-delgado.jpg
What's up with the board shorts? Don't they show their legs?
 
What's up with the board shorts? Don't they show their legs?

That's just how they roll in Physique. I think the only reason is to give some obvious indicator that this isn't the traditional bodybuilding category, but I agree that it's weird.


fx9xzt.jpg
 
That's just how they roll in Physique. I think the only reason is to give some obvious indicator that this isn't the traditional bodybuilding category, but I agree that it's weird.


fx9xzt.jpg
That looks ridiculous and makes no sense! I bet they all have chicken legs lol
 
That looks ridiculous and makes no sense! I bet they all have chicken legs lol

Ha. Yeah, like I said, I think it's just to give them their own look that says to people, "This isn't the bodybuilding category!"

But it is weird, and like you say it doesn't give those guys much incentive to train their legs.
 
Posting in a thread that is making me want to try steroids.
 
The best physiques belong to the dudes in the 1940s before steroids
 
I know that feeling.

I always think it would be worth it to do one cycle. I've heard a lot of people talk about how some of the gains are permanent or at least long term, and that guys who've done them before will always have a higher ceiling than lifetime natural athletes.

I don't know though. I'd be worried about hair loss and shit, or just fucking with my endocrine system.

But on the other hand, I wouldn't mind going full beef castle for a hot minute.
 
I always think it would be worth it to do one cycle. I've heard a lot of people talk about how some of the gains are permanent or at least long term, and that guys who've done them before will always have a higher ceiling than lifetime natural athletes.

I don't know though. I'd be worried about hair loss and shit, or just fucking with my endocrine system.

But on the other hand, I wouldn't mind going full beef castle for a hot minute.

I think you hit on an important point: How much of the gains do we get to hold onto?

I mean, Super Vitor and the Vitor of today looks like two different people. What has he held onto?

But yeah, if I had the right advices from a qualified physician, I really think I'd give it a shot. I'd need to feel confident that I was getting good information that was consistent with the latest research, though.
 
Back
Top