- Joined
- Jan 17, 2020
- Messages
- 7,033
- Reaction score
- 13,812
Why can’t my criminal get off on a technicality???
"why can't my team just jail him???"
Why can’t my criminal get off on a technicality???
Because they haven’t had a trial yet?"why can't my team just jail him???"
oh just admit it, you would take a shot right out of her diva cup
Before I respond, I do sincerely apologize for insulting you. You are right that it was uncalled for.A Republican who donated to Fani Willis campaign in 2020.
Also, I don’t have kids unfortunately but either way it’s not necessary to try to insult me. I did not insult you or any of your friends in this thread.
This will be a little off topic but speaking more broadly outside of this case, simply saying you’re a Republican, or least of all, having been a member of the federalist society(Wray) doesn’t mean dick anymore.
There is a clear schism between the 4-5 percent of remaining Bush/McCain era beltway neo-cons and the rest of the Republican Party. Problem is, that remaining portion of dinosaurs still holds basically all Republican representation in the bureaucracy and a lot of the judiciary.
For example, The debate commission is supposed to be split among republicans and democrats to ensure the vetting of moderators, venue, etc is fair to both candidates. Bob Dole had said that he personally knew every Republican who sat on that commission and was supposed to be making sure Trump got a fair shake…and not a single one supported President Trump. In fact, most of them hated Trump. I’m sure they all had their Republican bonafides from the early aughts as well but beltway republicans are more closely aligned with democrats nowadays if only just for one issue. Their opposition to Trump and a more nationalist movement.
How many former Bush and McCain aides work for MSNBC now and are even more mouth foaming than left wing lifers? Many still claim to be republicans.
I suspect a federalist society member who donated to Fani Willis Fulton county campaign didn’t do so for her conservative approach to law.
But the point is, most republicans know that simply pointing out that a judge, commentator, or bureaucrat is registered Republican warrants further examination.
Anyway, I think this case is going nowhere and won’t get anywhere near Trump before the election…which is the purpose of it. Will bump when it turns out.
I'm up for anything after 6 busch lights
Missouri did legalize weed
He did. Biden is too mentally retarded to face charges. Didn’t ya hear?Why can’t my criminal get off on a technicality???
He did. Biden is too mentally retarded to face charges. Didn’t ya hear?
truly a man of class and culture. i respect that.
Wow. What a great and accurate, perhaps too great and accurate statement by our favourite President. Probably should be our current president , if not for some things, very perculiar things
She’s still on the case lmao wow
A federalist society judge just ruled against Trump's legal team. He's part of the deep state now too..."why can't my team just jail him???"
A federalist society judge just ruled against Trump's legal team. He's part of the deep state now too...
You really should go back to "the party of law and order"...this whole business of "its not fair" if it doesn't benefit a guy EVEN YOU know is a lifetime crook and conman, is...unbecoming.
A mistake or two, I get it, we all make ‘em. He makes them often enough that it’s clear he’s a fuckin liar.
Embarrassing liars is fun, so I kind of appreciate it.
"why can't my team just jail him???"
He did. Biden is too mentally retarded to face charges. Didn’t ya hear?
I'm guessing you haven't followed that story beyond partisan talking points.

Do your own research, dork. It isn’t that hard.So what questions was Hur asked by the House Judiciary on this issue and how did he answer?