Yup, her perjury is official now.The male lawyer right now is actually trumps. He just did a great job getting the email to Bradley admitted into court, as well as some texts. Yuge!
What're you saying, double-wide pissbelt?hehehehehehehehehehehehe
you wear your dress backbards like Fani, mandiWhat're you saying, double-wide pissbelt?
How does that change ANYTHING? This has been well know since the start of the case. It's the reason (along with the low pay) that Mr. Wade got an offer in the first place, Fani had offered the job to other attorney's previously, but got turned down.
She must have liked making him sandwichesTestimony was Fani hired him at $500,000 per year, HIGHER than Georgia had ever paid for the same exact position. They sure wanted him bad... I mean Fani sure wanted him bad, and she had him - multiple times.
Great sig btw I watch that series once or twice a year.She must have liked making him sandwiches
Her flag pin is messed up too lol
Google "womens dresses with zippers in front" and let me know if you get any results. FWIW, you will absolutely get a shit ton of them because they are very common.zippers on women's dresses are ALWAYS in the back.
@Darkballs are you watching this live? or wonder if you followed this much. Love to read your opinion .
Thanks gumshoeWhy are you posting obviously incorrect stuff. A simply look at the dress seams shows they are not the same.
seriously...what are you talking about?You're begging like Tucker in front of Putin's peen, Captain Copetastic. Whatever will we do?
They had multiple witnesses lined up to impeach Mr. Bradley's character. I found it interesting they would proceed down that path after he twisted himself into a pretzel protecting his friend. At face value, keeping his credibility intact would seem appealing. However, I can surmise they did so because they feared what could take place in camera. After destroying his life, I'd love to be a fly on the wall. That move might improve his recollection. It was cold-blooded!That was amazing. Today looked like it was going to be boring AF, until the last 30 min.
I don’t even know why the state destroyed Bradley other than to distract from Wade and Willis. He literally got away with the privledge claim ffor anything juicy. He had literally turned on the defense and did everything the state wanted.
Then they reveal his supposed assault that his family and friends might not have known about, etc.
But why? If anything, it hurts them because it showed Bradley didn’t know what client priv might be, so the texts and emails he claimed were, now might make the judge question it.
Plus the state called him a liar. So was he lying about not seeing Willis at the office, etc?
Plus the side tangent and making today about Bradley seemed to piss off the judge.
I think they had planned to gut Bradley thinking he was going to testify more about Wade, breaking the privledge, but they decided to sacrifice him anyways to change focus off the allegations of Willis and Wade.
They had multiple witnesses lined up to impeach Mr. Bradley's character. I found it interesting they would proceed down that path after he twisted himself into a pretzel protecting his friend. At face value, keeping his credibility intact would seem appealing. However, I can surmise they did so because they feared what could take place in camera. After destroying his life, I'd love to be a fly on the wall. That move might improve his recollection. It was cold-blooded!
The issue is if you take the stance that Trump is corrupt, the people prosecuting him should be squeaky clean. It looks like corruption vs. corruption. It's not looking good from any perspective. As Cenk Uygur opined, the whole thing is sus.lol none of this has changed the allegations Trump, Rudy, Meadows, and the other scum bags are facing. I guess it works for dorks that are easily distracted.
i've seen nothing presented thus far that shows any prosecutorial misconduct. The worst i see is they had a relationship that they probably should not have allowed to happen, but you've gotta really be stretching things to even begin to think this case is getting thrown out over it.The issue is if you take the stance that Trump is corrupt, the people prosecuting him should be squeaky clean. It looks like corruption vs. corruption. It's not looking good from any perspective. As Cenk Uygur opined, the whole thing is sus.