Law Details of Fani Willis’ alleged ‘improper’ relationship with prosecutor may go public as judge unseals his divorce case

[HereticBD]

In Canada
douche cheeseburger $4.79
Mac sauce $0.49
Big Mac combo $13.89

$29.73 before taxes (which changes from one province to another)
It'd be $34.18 for me in Québec

Damn, them douche cheeseburgers must be good.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

In Canada
douche cheeseburger $4.79
Mac sauce $0.49
Big Mac combo $13.89

$29.73 before taxes (which changes from one province to another)
It'd be $34.18 for me in Québec

how do you get 30 bucks out of that? oh i guess if youre buying for 2. or if you buy 3 or 4 douche deluxe's on top of your big mac combo. your asshole and your innards will surely regret such a bad decision. don't do it!

i don't think ive ever spent more than 20 bucks on fast food on my hungriest of days. though it costs a fair bit more to eat real food at a restaurant. why not just buy the ingredients and cook your meals at home yourself?

 

[Kingz]

So Trump fans are hoping that this will get the case thrown out instead of a new prosecutor being assigned? They want to replace one that "only got the position because of a personal relationship" with a more qualified person? The real goal here is to delay the trial in hopes that Trump wins.

If Willis is taken off the case then so is her entire office. Essentially the entire case is shot because they are only bringing the case because Trump is running for President. If they can’t get it off before the election, there is no appetite to try it.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

If Willis is taken off the case then so is her entire office. Essentially the entire case is shot because they are only bringing the case because Trump is running for President. If they can’t get it off before the election, there is no appetite to try it.

Plus at least one of the lawyers for trump and/or the codefendents brought up that if they are unethical, it corrupts the forensic aspect of the grand jury and over all indictment. Something along those lines, which I had mentioned before. Same thing happened to Jack smith in the case against former VA governor. The grand jury was bogus, completely one sided, hid evidence, no due process, etc. even the liberal justices over turned it.

For reference, this was the head of the grand jury. Yea, someone coming in last minute and inheriting this case is gonna be in for a shit show

Since it was not a trial, Trump and his defendants could not argue against any jurors, provide defense, etc

And having actual retards on the grand jury kind of put that grand jury into question. Along with the rest of it



Longer version

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Plus at least one of the lawyers for trump and/or the codefendents brought up that if they are unethical, it corrupts the forensic aspect of the grand jury and over all indictment. Something along those lines, which I had mentioned before. Same thing happened to Jack smith in the case against former VA governor. The grand jury was bogus, completely one sided, hid evidence, no due process, etc. even the liberal justices over turned it.

For reference, this was the head of the grand jury. Yea, someone coming in last minute and inheriting this case is gonna be in for a shit show

Since it was not a trial, Trump and his defendants could not argue against any jurors, provide defense, etc

And having actual retards on the grand jury kind of put that grand jury into question. Along with the rest of it



Longer version

cope and seethe bro.

as a staunch supporter of personal accountability and a proud member of the party of law and order, i really hate it when people get held criminally responsible for committing crimes.

 

[cottagecheesefan]

cope and seethe bro.

as a staunch supporter of personal accountability and a proud member of the party of law and order, i really hate it when people get held criminally responsible for committing crimes.

I was about to reply, asking for a source about her being removed, because you said that lady was not on the grand jury at the end, but seems you edited you post?

Just for follow up, here is AFTER the indictment, and MSNBC does not say she was removed, as they continue to use her interview as some way of framing it as Willis not going after everyone she could.

But just to be clear, I assume you don’t have a source of her not being on the grand jury? If so, how was she removed midway through the process? The judge even ruled after the interview it was OK. Even IF she was removed, how does that change that jurors in a grand jury are not contested and can be presented whatever?

Again, to anyone thinking he made a point before editing his post to a complete deflection, here is MSNBC after the indictment. They clearly say she was involved throughout the grand jury “investigation “

 

[idrankyourbeer]

I was about to reply, asking for a source about her being removed, because you said that lady was not on the grand jury at the end, but seems you edited you post?

Just for follow up, here is AFTER the indictment, and MSNBC does not say she was removed, as they continue to use her interview as some way of framing it as Willis not going after everyone she could.

But just to be clear, I assume you don’t have a source of her not being on the grand jury? If so, how was she removed midway through the process? The judge even ruled after the interview it was OK. Even IF she was removed, how does that change that jurors in a grand jury are not contested and can be presented whatever?

Again, to anyone thinking he made a point before editing his post to a complete deflection, here is MSNBC after the indictment. They clearly say she was involved throughout the grand jury “investigation “

and emily kohr's wasn't even the grand jury panel that indicted trump. the names of the actual jurors who indicted donald trump have been ordered to remain redacted in secrecy because maga trash are violent.

emily kohrs was part of the special purpose grand jury who ultimately recommended charges against trump after the investigation. that jury panel was seated on may 2'nd 2002 and sat through the investigation and heard testimony of over 60 witnesses while under oath. emily kohr's and the rest of the special grand jurors were not on the same jury panel that actually indicted him. they just put forward recommendations for charges in their final report. that was it.

the actual grand jury that indicted donald trump was seated on tuesday, july 13, 2023, and they returned their verdicts to indict trump and his 19 co-conspirators about a month later.

 

[N13]

Plus at least one of the lawyers for trump and/or the codefendents brought up that if they are unethical, it corrupts the forensic aspect of the grand jury and over all indictment. Something along those lines, which I had mentioned before. Same thing happened to Jack smith in the case against former VA governor. The grand jury was bogus, completely one sided, hid evidence, no due process, etc. even the liberal justices over turned it.

For reference, this was the head of the grand jury. Yea, someone coming in last minute and inheriting this case is gonna be in for a shit show

Since it was not a trial, Trump and his defendants could not argue against any jurors, provide defense, etc

And having actual retards on the grand jury kind of put that grand jury into question. Along with the rest of it



Longer version

Word

 

[N13]

I was about to reply, asking for a source about her being removed, because you said that lady was not on the grand jury at the end, but seems you edited you post?

Just for follow up, here is AFTER the indictment, and MSNBC does not say she was removed, as they continue to use her interview as some way of framing it as Willis not going after everyone she could.

But just to be clear, I assume you don’t have a source of her not being on the grand jury? If so, how was she removed midway through the process? The judge even ruled after the interview it was OK. Even IF she was removed, how does that change that jurors in a grand jury are not contested and can be presented whatever?

Again, to anyone thinking he made a point before editing his post to a complete deflection, here is MSNBC after the indictment. They clearly say she was involved throughout the grand jury “investigation “

Logos

 

[cottagecheesefan]

and emily kohr's wasn't even the grand jury panel that indicted trump. the names of the actual jurors who indicted donald trump have been ordered to remain redacted in secrecy because maga trash are violent.

emily kohrs was part of the special purpose grand jury who ultimately recommended charges against trump after the investigation. that jury panel was seated on may 2'nd 2002 and sat through the investigation and heard testimony of over 60 witnesses while under oath. emily kohr's and the rest of the special grand jurors were not on the same jury panel that actually indicted him.

the actual grand jury that indicted donald trump was seated on tuesday, july 13, 2023, and they voted to indict trump and his 19 co-conspirators about a month later.

So she was on the panel for the investigation that recommended charges. OK, so that entirely proves my point that the “forensics” of the investigation are completely called into question

Thanks for conpletely proving my point.

 

[HereticBD]

I was about to reply, asking for a source about her being removed, because you said that lady was not on the grand jury at the end, but seems you edited you post?

Just for follow up, here is AFTER the indictment, and MSNBC does not say she was removed, as they continue to use her interview as some way of framing it as Willis not going after everyone she could.

But just to be clear, I assume you don’t have a source of her not being on the grand jury? If so, how was she removed midway through the process? The judge even ruled after the interview it was OK. Even IF she was removed, how does that change that jurors in a grand jury are not contested and can be presented whatever?

Again, to anyone thinking he made a point before editing his post to a complete deflection, here is MSNBC after the indictment. They clearly say she was involved throughout the grand jury “investigation “

Why do they always look so insane? How did we get to a point where this CLEARLY unhinged person, is involved in this process?

 

[idrankyourbeer]

So she was on the panel for the investigation that recommended charges. OK, so that entirely proves my point that the “forensics” of the investigation are completely called into question

Thanks for conpletely proving my point.

she was the head of the special purpose grand jury who was present throughout the georgia investigation. she was not part of the grand jury that indicted trump.

just thought i would clarify that before we go out hunting for witches and scapegoats.

here's an idea, maybe the fraudy orange election-losing rapist shouldnt be out there trying to defraud his country and steal elections. then he wouldn't have been indicted under all of these terrible felonies. perhaps he should have just accepted his defeat after that senile old man pushed his shit in instead of trying to defraud the election and harass a bunch of poll workers and send fraudulent electors to the capitol. food for thought.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Why do they always look so insane? How did we get to a point where this CLEARLY unhinged person, is in this process?

canadian trumptard says what?

i am just as much unhinged as you are tired from all of this winning lately. tomorrow is promising to be a big day for you muppets as well. law and order baby!

 

[cottagecheesefan]

Logos

He actually just confirmed she was the foreperson for the investigation. Then they present that to one other completely unvetted group, which the only did because, why? Trump and defendants still did not have due process, right to contest, basically everything I said but x2, which just shows the corrupt lawfare democrats are going to destroy democracy lol. Like what a fucking idiot of a poster

Why do they always look so insane? How did we get to a point where this CLEARLY unhinged person, is in this process?

And as he proved (I guess), at the very least, supported my argument. But his post even highlights the lawfare. Cause even if Trump and codefendents contest her after that debacle of a news appearance, the left freaks then file further motions to drag it out (yes it is called lawfare), it cost money and bad headlines

The difference is Trump is rich and, more importantly, has a powerful voice. That former VA governor I mentioned is not as lucky, and that bogus case by Jack smith ruined that guys careee. He could have contested Romney and even Trump in 2016

Same thing happened to Eric greitens, governor of Missouri, where a corrupt FBI agent and DA (Soros backed) ruined his marriage and political career over bogus claims, where the former FBi agent is now in jail and that DA removed.

 

[Super_Nintendo]

whatever you say there champ. now hurry up. my feet ain't gonna wash themselves. less talky-talky more washy-washy.

and while you're at it, go tell fani willis to make me my sammich. hold the pickles!

 

[cottagecheesefan]

It actually circles back to the hearing to today. If it was such a great case, etc, why did they need a second, special grand jury?

Perhaps was it so bill Wade his friends more money? So that he could further cohabitat, tap that, and travel the world with Ms. Fanni?

Or mayhaps it was to prolong the process for, wait for it, “election interference “

Probably both, right?

Very good point brought up by @idrankyourbeer

 

[Andy Capp]

If Willis is taken off the case then so is her entire office. Essentially the entire case is shot because they are only bringing the case because Trump is running for President. If they can’t get it off before the election, there is no appetite to try it.

You can keep praying but it's not going to do your orange hero any good, son. <45>

 

[idrankyourbeer]

It actually circles back to the hearing to today. If it was such a great case, etc, why did they need a second, special grand jury?

Perhaps was it so bill Wade his friends more money? So that he could further cohabitat, tap that, and travel the world with Ms. Fanni?

Very good point brought up by @idrankyourbeer

the conspiracy runs deeper than deepest of the deep state conspiracies my friend.

don't you worry though my dude. they'll get to the bottom of it one day i'm sure. right after they get done removing hunter biden and his laptop from political office, releasing trump's new health care plan, obama's real birth certificate, and all of that evidence of election fraud that only a crackhead pillow salesman is allowed to lay eyes on, and sending fani willis back to her rightful kitchen to make me a sammich. should be any day now. but just not today.

 

[Cool Hand Luke]

the conspiracy runs deeper than deepest of the deep state conspiracies my friend.

don't you worry though my dude. they'll get to the bottom of it one day i'm sure. right after they get done removing hunter biden and his laptop from political office, releasing trump's new health care plan, obama's real birth certificate, and all of that evidence of election fraud that only a crackhead pillow salesman is allowed to lay eyes on, and sending fani willis back to her rightful kitchen to make me a sammich. should be any day now. but just not today.

You know, you're the American @Britt/Scot - I applaud you.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

You know, you're the American @Britt/Scot - I applaud you.

i'm not at all familiar with that poster, but ive spent the last 4 years or so pretty much exclusive to the war room. i dont remember (m)any of that users posts.

it appears as if that poster went AWOL on december 6 2021. former GOP senate leader Bob Dole died on december 5'th 2021. perhaps @Britt/Scot was really Bob Dole? he may have died while sherdogging and his wife turned off the computer the next day?

i mean that cant be any more ridiculous than some of these conspiracies getting floated around here. i mean we're supposed to believe that donald trump and the georgia 19 are being prosecuted and they spent years of investigative work and filling out thousands of papers and listening to all the testimony just because fani willis wants to bang some guy, make sandwiches, have lunch, and maybe go on a vacation somewhere. good heavens no, how dare somebody want to have a private life instead of just putting criminals in prison 24/7. the horror!