Law Details of Fani Willis’ alleged ‘improper’ relationship with prosecutor may go public as judge unseals his divorce case

Death By Samson said:
And Wade's team tried to block him from testifying. I wonder why? It's almost like he has information that will contradict what Willis and Wade have testified to under oath.
Click to expand...
No, that's just normal lawyering. Any lawyer worth his salt is going to claim attorney-client privilege and make the court force disclosure. The lawyer can't just volunteer the info because if the client brings an ethics violation for breach of privilege, the attorney gets sanctioned. So, every lawyer hides behind privilege until told otherwise.

Similarly, every client has to assert privilege. And a client who is an attorney will absolutely do this. Again, for the same reasons. We treat every conversation with a lawyer as privileged until we're forced to treat it as otherwise.

In a high profile situation like this, the lawyers are going to be extra careful about what is and isn't privileged.
 
The look on Bradley's face as he approaches the stand says a lot.
 
Darkballs said:
Regardless, the original question was how any of this is supposed to have prejudiced trump, or somehow invalidates the grand jury's decision to indict? And I'm still waiting on that one.
Click to expand...
I have asked the same question several times and they don't have an answer for it.

Apparently If it's not an incompetent hack Trump appointed judge like Cannon then they'll find some reason why they think the prosecutor or the judge is corrupt or just out to get trump and instead of reassigning the case, for some reason it should just be dismissed entirely.

"Your honor, my clients defense is that years after his alleged crimes, the prosecution had a relationship with a coworker, therefore we move to have the entire case dismissed." - it's beyond laughable.
 
bradley afraid of being labeled a snitch <45>
 
  • Like
Reactions: N13
Striderxdj said:
I have asked the same question several times and they don't have an answer for it.

Apparently If it's not an incompetent hack Trump appointed judge like Cannon then they'll find some reason why they think the prosecutor or the judge is corrupt or just out to get trump and instead of reassigning the case, for some reason it should just be dismissed entirely.

"Your honor, my clients defense is that years after his alleged crimes, the prosecution had a relationship with a coworker, therefore we move to have the entire case dismissed." - it's beyond laughable.
Click to expand...
You have gotten answers plenty of times, you just don't like the answer.

There is no crime, there is political corruption from incompetent partisans trying to prosecute the opposition in a presidential election, and they couldn't even do that without funneling tax money into their male prostitution tab.

You are obviously allowed to challenge sketchy election results, the democrats do it in every single election they lose, and it's even more laughable that dems in GA would claim otherwise after Stacy Abrams refused to accept her loss by 5x as many votes out a much smaller total vote count, that was just a normal election with no drop boxes switching results in the dead of night or burst water pipes.

Yes, these retards are trying to rig another election with flimsy lawsuits that enrich themselves at taxpayer expense, they are only doing it in the most corrupt and partisan districts, the governor of NY just gave a speech telling investors not to flee the state, saying it was just a political play and not to worry because the rules only apply to their political opponents.

Sorry these hoodrats couldn't keep it in their pants and couldn't miss the chance to funnel more taxpayer dollars into their sexual escapades, but this is the corruption you demand because your only standard for anything anything is orange man bad.
 
nostradumbass said:
You have gotten answers plenty of times, you just don't like the answer.

There is no crime, there is political corruption from incompetent partisans trying to prosecute the opposition in a presidential election, and they couldn't even do that without funneling tax money into their male prostitution tab.

You are obviously allowed to challenge sketchy election results, the democrats do it in every single election they lose, and it's even more laughable that dems in GA would claim otherwise after Stacy Abrams refused to accept her loss by 5x as many votes out a much smaller total vote count, that was just a normal election with no drop boxes switching results in the dead of night or burst water pipes.

Yes, these retards are trying to rig another election with flimsy lawsuits that enrich themselves at taxpayer expense, they are only doing it in the most corrupt and partisan districts, the governor of NY just gave a speech telling investors not to flee the state, saying it was just a political play and not to worry because the rules only apply to their political opponents.

Sorry these hoodrats couldn't keep it in their pants and couldn't miss the chance to funnel more taxpayer dollars into their sexual escapades, but this is the corruption you demand because your only standard for anything anything is orange man bad.
Click to expand...

I like how he also says, "Apparently If it's not an incompetent hack Trump appointed judge like Cannon then they'll find some reason why they think the prosecutor or the judge is corrupt or just out to get trump "

Meanwhile, these two prosecutors are literally now in court defending their corruption and incompetence lol.

It is beautiful to see really.
 
cottagecheesefan said:
I like how he also says, "Apparently If it's not an incompetent hack Trump appointed judge like Cannon then they'll find some reason why they think the prosecutor or the judge is corrupt or just out to get trump "

Meanwhile, these two prosecutors are literally now in court defending their corruption and incompetence lol.

It is beautiful to see really.
Click to expand...
These people are not well. They never ask themselves why none of these cases are in purple counties, they are ONLY in 80+% democrat counties because obviously they don't want the merits of the preposterous cases, they want people who would convict the orange man of the jack the ripper murders. Everybody county that isn't at least 80% democrat are partisan hacks. Derp.
 
Last edited:
chardog said:
bradley afraid of being labeled a snitch <45>
Click to expand...

CantCucktheTuck said:
He is defiantly trying to cover for something.
Click to expand...

He actually wanted to testify at first, but then the GA Bar association threatened him, saying if he did, he would likely lose his license. But he was already working with the big boobie lady lawyer for the defense. She even reviewed her court filings with him if I remember correctly, prior to submitting. Then Wade and Willis got the Bar Association to step in and say he couldn't.


Defense argued, correctly it seems, that texts that were casual, friendship related text are not protected under the attorney client priv.

edit: dunno why the URL embedding thing looks weird and says GDPR Support. But the link still works if you click it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N13


She was caught committing perjury. This is incredible and the fact the left is so high on her show they don't care about justice or law.
 
cottagecheesefan said:
He actually wanted to testify at first, but then the GA Bar association threatened him, saying if he did, he would likely lose his license. But he was already working with the big boobie lady lawyer for the defense. She even reviewed her court filings with him if I remember correctly, prior to submitting. Then Wade and Willis got the Bar Association to step in and say he couldn't.


Defense argued, correctly it seems, that texts that were casual, friendship related text are not protected under the attorney client priv.

edit: dunno why the URL embedding thing looks weird and says GDPR Support. But the link still works if you click it.
Click to expand...
didnt follow this case closely, however, it's clear



Merchant, not very good on the stand, but that rack = catfish <Lmaoo>
 
chardog said:
didnt follow this case closely, however, it's clear



Merchant, not very good on the stand, but that rack = catfish <Lmaoo>
Click to expand...

Oh shit, I didn't realize there was a hearing today! I thought he would be testifying this Friday. I watched entire 2day hearing(s) a couple weeks ago. Found it all very entertaining lol

Here is a link for anyone who is interested. I just went back to the start

 
8e654434.jpg


so now theyre making up evidence and lying to the judge. this is going to work out real swell for them, as expected.

these people are so utterly stupid, whatever chance they had in returning a verdict in their favor, they've just destroyed it.
 
idrankyourbeer said:
8e654434.jpg


so now theyre making up evidence and lying to the judge. this is going to work out real swell for them, as expected.

these people are so utterly stupid, whatever chance they had in returning a verdict in their favor, they've just destroyed it.
Click to expand...
That was retarded. They should’ve just used the spaz that went second for the entirety of the questioning.
 
cottagecheesefan said:
Oh shit, I didn't realize there was a hearing today! I thought he would be testifying this Friday. I watched entire 2day hearing(s) a couple weeks ago. Found it all very entertaining lol

Here is a link for anyone who is interested. I just went back to the start

Click to expand...

Lmao you dorks got squashed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,532
Messages
58,294,203
Members
175,998
Latest member
Move With Love

Share this page

Back
Top