• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Elections Democrats are in very big trouble going forward. Blue state inefficiency in everything

F1980

Purple Belt
@purple
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
1,870
Reaction score
2,406
Fareed Zakariah talks about state government inefficiency of the blue states. It is fucking mind blowing how much more money they spend when compared to red states. Specifically he compares New York and California to Florida and Texas

The blue states spend so much more money on everything, but the results they get are actually the same or even WORSE than in red states.

New York spends 25% of its collected taxes JUST on government worker PENSIONS. That is fucking INSANITY. And yet the streets are not any safer or any cleaner than when they were spending a lot less money.

 
Sanctuary states also. We should help them out by broadcasting that fact as far and wipe as possible and in as many languages as needed.

They could certainly use the help of lots and lots more illegals to grown their staye.
 
“Montana led the states with the highest proportion of federal funding to the overall budget at 31.8%, followed by New Mexico (30.7%), Kentucky (30.1%), Louisiana (29.8%), and Alaska (29.0%)”

Why are most of these states red and relying on Federal handouts? Not to mention, they struggle most with single parenthood, murder rates, etc.


 
“Montana led the states with the highest proportion of federal funding to the overall budget at 31.8%, followed by New Mexico (30.7%), Kentucky (30.1%), Louisiana (29.8%), and Alaska (29.0%)”

Why are most of these states red and relying on Federal handouts? Not to mention, they struggle most with single parenthood, murder rates, etc.


<WellThere>
 
“Montana led the states with the highest proportion of federal funding to the overall budget at 31.8%, followed by New Mexico (30.7%), Kentucky (30.1%), Louisiana (29.8%), and Alaska (29.0%)”

Why are most of these states red and relying on Federal handouts? Not to mention, they struggle most with single parenthood, murder rates, etc.



"Red states" as in the South, which has the highest concentration of black populations, who commit 60% of all the homicides in the country. That has nothing to do with the states being red. And also, it's the cities, which are blue cities, that have all the homicides.
 
Americans continue to move out of blue states at high rates due to blue state policies. I saw mention on the latest Uhaul moving data a few days ago pointing to a similar trend, young people moving out of blue states to red states due to greater opportunities seen in red states.


U-Haul report places Illinois near the bottom of places people are moving to

 
“Montana led the states with the highest proportion of federal funding to the overall budget at 31.8%, followed by New Mexico (30.7%), Kentucky (30.1%), Louisiana (29.8%), and Alaska (29.0%)”

Why are most of these states red and relying on Federal handouts? Not to mention, they struggle most with single parenthood, murder rates, etc.


In the case of Montana and Alaska, it's probably because there simply aren't enough people living there. Montana has an area of over 147k square miles but only an (aging) population of just over a million.

Alaska is 663,267 square miles, with a population of only 730k.
 
"Red states" as in the South, which has the highest concentration of black populations, who commit 60% of all the homicides in the country. That has nothing to do with the states being red. And also, it's the cities, which are blue cities, that have all the homicides.

Those are retarded talking points.

1. These states vote Republican so yes, they are red
2. Blue States have blue cities too
3. Blue States also have plenty of black people like Michigan, California, Illinois, etc.

It seems odd that when I debunked your claim about blue vs. red states. You just started drooling excuses and racial ID politics.
 
Those are retarded talking points.

1. These states vote Republican so yes, they are red
2. Blue States have blue cities too
3. Blue States also have plenty of black people like Michigan, California, Illinois, etc.

It seems odd that when I debunked your claim about blue vs. red states. You just started drooling excuses and racial ID politics.

You cannot mention homicide rates without mentioning black homicides. Blacks commit 60% of the homicides in the country, the vast majority. Blue cities in blue states also have the highest levels of homicides because of the African American populations. No matter red or blue, liberal or conservative policies, it's the black areas that have the highest levels of murder and other crimes, Hispanic areas second.

The fact that you are choosing to ignore this and actually throw the race card so nobody can talk about it, is the reason why your side lost and will continue to keep losing and become a permanent minority in politics.
 
“Montana led the states with the highest proportion of federal funding to the overall budget at 31.8%, followed by New Mexico (30.7%), Kentucky (30.1%), Louisiana (29.8%), and Alaska (29.0%)”

Why are most of these states red and relying on Federal handouts? Not to mention, they struggle most with single parenthood, murder rates, etc.



Can it dipshit...

27 of Top 30 Crime-Ridden Cities Run by Democrats

Why do you fucksticks fall into this everytime

Any idea why Montana gets so much federal funds? Its almost 50% National Forest

With several large Indian Reservations

Montana-State-Map-1265x772.jpg


lol... Try educating yourself before jamming your head up ass

California had $50-$70 Billion deficits the last two years from driving citizens and businesses away.

Guess how many useless government positions they had to ax to get back to balanced... lol
 
Back
Top