• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Democratic Party Approval at All Time Low

Confucamus said:
You copy and pasted this ChatGPT nonsense to analyze Kamala's campaign? The one that only lasted 3 months and she didn't even give an interview for the first 40 days of it? Sorry pal, the whole Democratic Party was balls deep in culture war issues for a lot longer than that. By that point, there was nothing she or her handlers could have come up with that was going to change the American people's minds.
Click to expand...


you used the word 'platform', what better guide to a platform do we have than *the issues she actually talked about on campaign*? That quick summary was merely a tool of convenience.

Deny it all you like but I definitely recall all the stuff on taxes, housing, small business, financial regulation, technology. None of which conform to your absurd stereotype that 'THEIR ENTIRE PLATFORM IS CULTURE WAR NONSENSE'.

Not only do I recall the issues I mentioned but I also recall the turn in the campaign identified by the 'left Dems' about midway through, when her campaign was taken over by DNC 'corporate Dems'. She spoke less about populist issues like wealth taxes, taxing billionaires and corporations, and more about crime and borders.

Lie to yourself that all she talked about was trannies if you want, it just makes you look fucken dumb.

lets recall she started out talking about price-gouging. You going to call that a culture war nonsense issue?
 

Typical left-wing economic agenda items like “living wage,” “affordable housing,” “paid family leave,” or “union jobs” dropped out of Harris’s vocabulary in the weeks after Labor Day. Tracking the use of more neutral terms relating to the economy — like “wages,” “jobs,” and “workers” — we see a trend line that slopes upward into early September before declining over the following weeks. By October, Harris was spending less of her time campaigning with Shawn Fain and Bernie Sanders than she was with Republican Liz Cheney and billionaire Mark Cuban, unlikely candidates to push any kind of progressive economic message, let alone a populist one. Cuban was gleeful enough to declare that the “progressive principles . . . of the Democratic Party . . . are gone. It’s Kamala Harris’s party now.”

This pivot wasn’t merely rhetorical: donors, consultants, and business-connected campaign staff pushed Harris to “clarify” or de-emphasize previous statements indicating support for a slate of popular policies on price controls; capital gains, corporate, and wealth taxes; and a host of other issues. Harris’s vague suggestions that she would engage in price controls to bring down inflation were watered down into a policy that already exists in most states that prevents businesses from profiteering on natural disasters. Her gestures toward taxing the wealthy became a capital gains tax proposal of 28 percent, far lower than the Biden administration’s proposed 40 percent; and she never took a position on Biden’s proposal to tax unrealized capital gains. And as time went on, the candidate spoke less and less frequently about her watered-down price-gouging proposal or her commitment to taxing the rich.


Wow, all this stuff about taxes and not a trannie in sight. Started off using the word 'workers' and 'wages' all the time.

If Harris’s rhetoric wasn’t focused on the economy, a specific economic policy platform, or an anti-elite message, what was she talking about in the campaign’s final weeks? As the race drew to a close, Harris highlighted her stance on abortion and her rightward-moving immigration policy. But the campaign’s closing message centered more than anything on one of the few issues that posed no threat to her donor base: the defense of democracy and the danger Trump posed to it.


but trannies tho
 

This is the type of people Democrats appeal too and she threw a fit about the Sydney Sweeney commercial.
 
Darkballs said:
Amazing
Click to expand...

Are you suggesting otherwise? She's fucking retarded







She alienated the biggest Union in country.





Joe Biden did not like Kamala... she was forced on him




The DNC did not want Kamala... Kamala was Biden's insurance policy... lol.

Then Biden sabotaged the DNC after he was forced out by Pelosi, Obama and Schumer

Obama, Pelosi did not want Kamala Harris to be nominee​

  • Biden endorsed Harris within an hour of stepping down

“He did not want to go gently,” Morgan said of Biden. “He nominated her, basically Obama did not want her. Obama did not endorse her for five days, Pelosi did not want her.”

According to Morgan, Biden’s endorsement of Harris was an “F you” to Obama and Pelosi.

“Pelosi told her California delegation, there will be a conference, there will be a caucus, there will be a convention,” Morgan said, a point touched upon by many Republican politicians and commentators during the process. “We basically ran on this deal where ‘democracy, democracy!’ And then we didn’t have democracy in picking our nominee.”


Do you need more proof? lol...

Come on.. Please make the argument that Kamala was the best pick as a Presidential Candidate for the Democrat Party

<36>

She's the penultimate example of the failures of DEI policies

And now maybe you understand why the Democrat Party is hemmoraging as bad as it is and an is in crisis mode

They've complete lost the plot and lost touch with the average American



<{nope}>
 
Confucamus said:
You copy and pasted this ChatGPT nonsense to analyze Kamala's campaign? The one that only lasted 3 months and she didn't even give an interview for the first 40 days of it? Sorry pal, the whole Democratic Party was balls deep in culture war issues for a lot longer than that. By that point, there was nothing she or her handlers could have come up with that was going to change the American people's minds.
Click to expand...
Lol at that dude having to put "Kamala Harris policies" into chat gpt because he couldn't think of any either.

Wasn't just not giving interviews, her campaign website didn't have 1 policy on it for that same 40 days, and was just a merch store selling Doug Emhoff coffee mugs. She ran entirely on "joy" and vibes.

The first policy she announced was "no tax on tips" stolen directly from Trump from just a couple weeks earlier, then it was straight up flailing and saying she'd print $25k for people to buy houses they can't afford, which would create another massive housing bubble, and set price controls on grocery stores that already run on like a 1% profit margin.

It was an absolute disaster of a campaign, but most of the lefties on here can't admit that they are the extreme "progressives" that have driven their party into a ditch.
 
Confucamus said:
When your entire platform is radicalized culture war nonsense, that's bound to happen. The only people who are shocked by this are the ones who still can't understand why Trump was re-elected, winning the popular vote and sweeping the swing states. You'd think there would be some introspection on their side but they choose to just double down and sink with the ship.
Click to expand...
Those same people have a warped view of reality and project the obsession on radical culture nonsense onto republicans. No idiots, that’s all you guys (Dems). Normal people aren’t going to feel comfortable having elected officials in charge who tell us men can get pregnant and have periods. That’s even stupider than the creationists ever were.
 
Scerpi said:
Are you suggesting otherwise? She's fucking retarded







She alienated the biggest Union in country.





Joe Biden did not like Kamala... she was forced on him




The DNC did not want Kamala... Kamala was Biden's insurance policy... lol.

Then Biden sabotaged the DNC after he was forced out by Pelosi, Obama and Schumer

Obama, Pelosi did not want Kamala Harris to be nominee​

  • Biden endorsed Harris within an hour of stepping down

“He did not want to go gently,” Morgan said of Biden. “He nominated her, basically Obama did not want her. Obama did not endorse her for five days, Pelosi did not want her.”

According to Morgan, Biden’s endorsement of Harris was an “F you” to Obama and Pelosi.

“Pelosi told her California delegation, there will be a conference, there will be a caucus, there will be a convention,” Morgan said, a point touched upon by many Republican politicians and commentators during the process. “We basically ran on this deal where ‘democracy, democracy!’ And then we didn’t have democracy in picking our nominee.”


Do you need more proof? lol...

Come on.. Please make the argument that Kamala was the best pick as a Presidential Candidate for the Democrat Party

<36>

She's the penultimate example of the failures of DEI policies

And now maybe you understand why the Democrat Party is hemmoraging as bad as it is and an is in crisis mode

They've complete lost the plot and lost touch with the average American



<{nope}>
Click to expand...

I’m so glad she lost. First, Biden ran the second worst admin in my lifetime (of course we know he wasn’t actually running anything) GWB is still worse. She said she’d do nothing different…..

Second, she told the unions she didn’t need them. That’s dumb fucking funny. Democrats’ own internal polling had her losing. I guess she was too stupid, lazy, and or prideful to actually look into those and just believed the media hype like the stupid sheep she was supposed to be leading.
lol at that can
 
Last edited:
White Whale said:

This is the type of people Democrats appeal too and she threw a fit about the Sydney Sweeney commercial.
Click to expand...


It's shocking how black on white racism is tolerated, even endorsed.

Take note War Room lefties... this is real racism

@Sinister

And she's still employed at the The New Yorker...lol

www.newyorker.com

Doreen St. Félix

Doreen St. Félix, a staff writer at The New Yorker since 2017, is a regular contributor to the weekly column Critic’s Notebook. Previously, she was a culture writer at MTV News. Her writing has appeared in the Times Magazine, New York, Vogue, The Fader, and Pitchfork. St. Félix was named on the...
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com

GyaVLhabEAEX9wE
 
IanEdwards said:
you used the word 'platform', what better guide to a platform do we have than *the issues she actually talked about on campaign*? That quick summary was merely a tool of convenience.

Deny it all you like but I definitely recall all the stuff on taxes, housing, small business, financial regulation, technology. None of which conform to your absurd stereotype that 'THEIR ENTIRE PLATFORM IS CULTURE WAR NONSENSE'.

Not only do I recall the issues I mentioned but I also recall the turn in the campaign identified by the 'left Dems' about midway through, when her campaign was taken over by DNC 'corporate Dems'. She spoke less about populist issues like wealth taxes, taxing billionaires and corporations, and more about crime and borders.

Lie to yourself that all she talked about was trannies if you want, it just makes you look fucken dumb.

lets recall she started out talking about price-gouging. You going to call that a culture war nonsense issue?
Click to expand...

There's a fundamental unfairness in this critique.

Yea Kamala didn't say much about trans or other culture war issues, but that's because it was already the status quo. She just implicitly supported all the policies behind the scenes and STFU about it because she knew it was deeply unpopular.

Transwomen were already competing against real women in sports, stealing was already decriminalized in a lot of cities, transwomen were already allowed in female prisons, they were already allowed into female changing rooms, sororities, they were already getting scholarships for girls, etc.

So if all of those things were already the status quo and half the population has a problem with these policies and says something, the Dems and Kamala can't turn around and say "Why are you making this an issue!!? Stop talking about this!" "This is a non-issue!" "Stop being obsessed about this!"

Uhm it's an issue because half the population has a serious problem with these policies. The liberals don't want to talk about it anymore because the status quo was already their default position.
 
Last edited:
IanEdwards said:
you used the word 'platform', what better guide to a platform do we have than *the issues she actually talked about on campaign*? That quick summary was merely a tool of convenience.

Deny it all you like but I definitely recall all the stuff on taxes, housing, small business, financial regulation, technology. None of which conform to your absurd stereotype that 'THEIR ENTIRE PLATFORM IS CULTURE WAR NONSENSE'.

Not only do I recall the issues I mentioned but I also recall the turn in the campaign identified by the 'left Dems' about midway through, when her campaign was taken over by DNC 'corporate Dems'. She spoke less about populist issues like wealth taxes, taxing billionaires and corporations, and more about crime and borders.

Lie to yourself that all she talked about was trannies if you want, it just makes you look fucken dumb.

lets recall she started out talking about price-gouging. You going to call that a culture war nonsense issue?
Click to expand...
Jesus you can't be serious. They asked her what she would change.... She said "Absolutely Nothing". Her campaign was bullshit, no substance. The public saw it. The Dems saw it in her primaries for fuck sakes. A small group of Dems ruined it for the entire party with this last minute bullshit. A better candidate might have given Trump a run. A candidate not faking accents to appear black. Not talking about coconut trees and cooking collard greens. She sounded like RDY in Tropic Thunder.
 
Scerpi said:
Are you suggesting otherwise?
Click to expand...

I'm pointing out that you referred to her as "in competent."

Pro tip: If you can't spell a word correctly, don't use it when you argue that someone is retarded. You've managed to undercut your own argument before you got to the end of your first sentence.
 
Darkballs said:
I'm pointing out that you referred to her as "in competent."

Pro tip: If you can't spell a word correctly, don't use it when you argue that someone is retarded. You've managed to undercut your own argument before you got to the end of your first sentence.
Click to expand...

Oh fuck off

I'm typing on my phone
 
Scerpi said:
Oh fuck off

I'm typing on my phone
Click to expand...

And misspelling words in the same sentence you call someone a retard.

And stop whining so much. For guys who complain about everyone else being soft, you sure do throw temper tantrums when people point out your mistakes.
 
Darkballs said:
I'm pointing out that you referred to her as "in competent."

Pro tip: If you can't spell a word correctly, don't use it when you argue that someone is retarded. You've managed to undercut your own argument before you got to the end of your first sentence.
Click to expand...

images
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,538
Messages
58,373,889
Members
176,016
Latest member
50 caliber beer bottle

Share this page

Back
Top