So we went from Republicans saying there was no Quid Pro Quo at all to well all politicians use Quid Pro Quo and now we've landed on Quid Pro Quo doesn't qualify as a high crime or misdemeanor?
Republicans are some desperate pieces of trash right about now continuing to do whatever is necessary to avoid admitting they allowed a shitbag into office on their party ticket. Trump could literally shoot a baby on the White House lawn and these losers would try to blame the baby for making aggressive movements before they would admit it was a bad idea to vote him into office.
lol. I'm sure someone has already put a bunch of laughing gifs after this post but I don't want to be left out.
Yes those ambassadors and government officials are all highly lacking in the credibility department. Where do you think that hearsay comes from? Who makes the decision to ask for an investigation on a political opponent and to hold up congressionally approved support?
Not the guy who is surrounded by people getting charged and convicted for crimes. Not the guy who is a known conspiracy theorist willing to spread lies such as the birther conspiracy. Not the guy who's been admitted to have millions in personal loans to a country that would directly benefit from his action. Not the guy who stole money from a charity.
The state ambassadors and career government officials who raised concerns about his behavior from day one are the ones lacking credibility. I'm not certain he committed a crime, but I'm certain there's enough reason for an impeachment to find the truth. If he's found innocent then ok. If he's found guilty then ok. But if we're going to impeach a President for lying about a fucking blowjob without outrage from Republicans then you should really just shut the fuck up and let the justice system do its job.
Pretty much why we can ignore anyone who goes on and on about "where's the crime?" Who gives a shit, impeachment doesn't require the commission of a crime. It requires an abuse or violation of some public trust.Actually Trumps behavior and the accusations against him are exactly grounds for impeachment. Clearly you don't even know what the fuck an impeachment proceeding is. Here's a hint... It's a formal investigation into alleged misconduct. Criminal charges and removal from office are options that can occur after the findings of an impeachment. The impeachment occurs to decide if he committed any crimes or if he was involved in misconduct, not because they know for a fact he committed a crime. So again, maybe you should shut the fuck up because you don't even know what an impeachment is.
Trump is being impeached because several government officials, all highly respected and holding high office, have claimed misconduct in relation to his actions towards Ukraine. That's grounds for an impeachment. This has nothing to do with a Democratic hissy-fit and everything to do with the fact that Trump likely engaged in unethical extortion to have political rivals looked into. Democrats don't like Trump because we've known from the beginning that he was a piece of shit.
"The notion that only criminal conduct can constitute sufficient grounds for impeachment does not comport with either the views of the founders or with historical practice.[1] Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist 65, described impeachable offenses as arising from "the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust."[3] Such offenses were "political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself."[3] According to this reasoning, impeachable conduct could include behavior that violates an official's duty to the country, even if such conduct is not necessarily a prosecutable offense. Indeed, in the past both houses of Congress have given the phrase "high Crimes and Misdemeanors" a broad reading, finding that impeachable offenses need not be limited to criminal conduct."
Impeachment of Walter L. Nixon, Jr., H.Rept. 101-36 at 5 (1989).
Cole, J. P.; Garvey, T. (October 29, 2015). "Report No. R44260, Impeachment and Removal"(PDF). Congressional Research Service. pp. 15–16. Retrieved September 22, 2016.This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. An earlier version from 2005 is at https://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-806.pdf.
Actually Trumps behavior and the accusations against him are exactly grounds for impeachment. Clearly you don't even know what the fuck an impeachment proceeding is. Here's a hint... It's a formal investigation into alleged misconduct. Criminal charges and removal from office are options that can occur after the findings of an impeachment. The impeachment occurs to decide if he committed any crimes or if he was involved in misconduct, not because they know for a fact he committed a crime. So again, maybe you should shut the fuck up because you don't even know what an impeachment is.
Trump is being impeached because several government officials, all highly respected and holding high office, have claimed misconduct in relation to his actions towards Ukraine. That's grounds for an impeachment. This has nothing to do with a Democratic hissy-fit and everything to do with the fact that Trump likely engaged in unethical extortion to have political rivals looked into. Democrats don't like Trump because we've known from the beginning that he was a piece of shit.
"The notion that only criminal conduct can constitute sufficient grounds for impeachment does not comport with either the views of the founders or with historical practice.[1] Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist 65, described impeachable offenses as arising from "the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust."[3] Such offenses were "political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself."[3] According to this reasoning, impeachable conduct could include behavior that violates an official's duty to the country, even if such conduct is not necessarily a prosecutable offense. Indeed, in the past both houses of Congress have given the phrase "high Crimes and Misdemeanors" a broad reading, finding that impeachable offenses need not be limited to criminal conduct."
Impeachment of Walter L. Nixon, Jr., H.Rept. 101-36 at 5 (1989).
Cole, J. P.; Garvey, T. (October 29, 2015). "Report No. R44260, Impeachment and Removal"(PDF). Congressional Research Service. pp. 15–16. Retrieved September 22, 2016.This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. An earlier version from 2005 is at https://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-806.pdf.
Actually Trumps behavior and the accusations against him are exactly grounds for impeachment. Clearly you don't even know what the fuck an impeachment proceeding is. Here's a hint... It's a formal investigation into alleged misconduct. Criminal charges and removal from office are options that can occur after the findings of an impeachment. The impeachment occurs to decide if he committed any crimes or if he was involved in misconduct, not because they know for a fact he committed a crime. So again, maybe you should shut the fuck up because you don't even know what an impeachment is.
Trump is being impeached because several government officials, all highly respected and holding high office, have claimed misconduct in relation to his actions towards Ukraine. That's grounds for an impeachment. This has nothing to do with a Democratic hissy-fit and everything to do with the fact that Trump likely engaged in unethical extortion to have political rivals looked into. Democrats don't like Trump because we've known from the beginning that he was a piece of shit.
"The notion that only criminal conduct can constitute sufficient grounds for impeachment does not comport with either the views of the founders or with historical practice.[1] Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist 65, described impeachable offenses as arising from "the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust."[3] Such offenses were "political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself."[3] According to this reasoning, impeachable conduct could include behavior that violates an official's duty to the country, even if such conduct is not necessarily a prosecutable offense. Indeed, in the past both houses of Congress have given the phrase "high Crimes and Misdemeanors" a broad reading, finding that impeachable offenses need not be limited to criminal conduct."
Impeachment of Walter L. Nixon, Jr., H.Rept. 101-36 at 5 (1989).
Cole, J. P.; Garvey, T. (October 29, 2015). "Report No. R44260, Impeachment and Removal"(PDF). Congressional Research Service. pp. 15–16. Retrieved September 22, 2016.This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. An earlier version from 2005 is at https://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/98-806.pdf.
Oh so those state officials are just upset about being left out of the loop, not because they were asked to do things they considered unethical.
Ah yes the guy who doesn't even know what the fuck an impeachment means is trying to educate me on impeachment.
you know better than a law professor...
count the times you've been lied to and were completely wrong about what Trump had done and what was going to happen to him over the last 3 years and then add another one to that. and then for self help try and notice the pattern and maybe find a better news source. youre being playedOh so those state officials are just upset about being left out of the loop, not because they were asked to do things they considered unethical.
Our ambassadors and officials involved in that exact situation are all just that petty over something so insignificant as being uninvolved despite BEING FUCKING INVOLVED AND IMMEDIATELY SEEING THE UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR. They all just conspired together to get the big bad Trump man over this.
start here and go backwards to collusion, nothing they said was correct.
