Elections Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless'

[Witchhunt]

He lost by like 8 million votes

Derp!

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/02/9406...se-key-states-powered-biden-to-the-presidency

 

[andnowweknow]

Derp!

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/02/9406...se-key-states-powered-biden-to-the-presidency

The biggest win Trumpers will ever achieve in this thread..."it was 7, not 8"...

 

[cincymma79]

He lost by like 8 million votes

No he didn’t. It was less than 50,000.

 

[curryjunkie]

"An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.

The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues. "Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)." The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below. “You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter@Rach_IC.

“This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.” The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings. It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden. The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction. Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed. It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity. Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”"


links to lawsuits and their status listed here:
https://election-integrity.info/2020_Election_Cases.htm

 

[koquerelle]

Finally! The smoking gun! I knew they'd eventually get it.

 

[andnowweknow]

No he didn’t. It was less than 50,000.

I heard, and people are saying this mind you, that if you flip the 50 upside down it looks like 20, and if you add 6 zeros to 20, that makes an even 20 million votes that Trump probably realistically actually won by. From there...well...it's not too big of a leap to suggest that Trump lost get over it.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

He lost by like 8 million votes

American elections are not decided by popular vote. I know you have zero clue about anything to do with politics, but this is pretty basic stuff.

 

[Source]

I heard, and people are saying this mind you, that if you flip the 50 upside down it looks like 20, and if you add 6 zeros to 20, that makes an even 20 million votes that Trump probably realistically actually won by. From there...well...it's not too big of a leap to suggest that Trump lost get over it.

They can’t and won’t get over if. They have literally been brainwashed.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

oh nice, a meaningless graph with no legend. are they circling the fraud that they never once made any real allegations of in court? or is it just the time when a a large dump of mail in ballots came in from milwaukee county? are we talking minutes, hours, weeks, months here or what? is this when the vote differencial between the two candidates went from 5 to 0? 500 to 0? 5000 to 0? 50,000 - 0 maybe? with a graph of that caliber, i guess we'll never know. super convincing. stolen election confirmed *yawn*

and who could ever forget the time when donald trump spent $3 million in wisconsin for a recount just to end up finding more legal votes for brandon? he must be getting tired of all of that winning. lets go again. RESTART THE COUNT!

 

[HOLA]

 

[Sinister]

oh nice, a meaningless graph with no legend. if it even bothered to show a time on it, i guess we'd be able to pinpoint around what time a large dump of mail in ballots came in from milwaukee county. but not even that. super convincing. *yawn*

who could ever forget the time when donald trump spent $3 million in wisconsin for a recount just to end up finding more legal votes for brandon? he must be getting tired of all of that winning. lets go again. RESTART THE COUNT!

I think literally every recount found wider margins for Biden and Republicans in the relevant States had to humiliate themselves admitting that. Which is why no one here in the Southwest will talk about Ninjas anymore. Oh wait there was a huge fraud case here in Nevada that made National news because Trump made a statement about it...how did that turn out again?

https://thenevadaindependent.com/ar...fraud-allegations-voted-his-dead-wifes-ballot

That's right, he used his dead wife's ballot to vote...for Trump. Lolz

 

[pinger]

This is it

 

[WklySportsMemes]

oh nice, a meaningless graph with no legend. if it even bothered to show a time on it, i guess we'd be able to pinpoint around what time a large dump of mail in ballots came in from milwaukee county. but not even that. super convincing. *yawn*

who could ever forget the time when donald trump spent $3 million in wisconsin for a recount just to end up finding more legal votes for brandon? he must be getting tired of all of that winning. lets go again. RESTART THE COUNT!

I have a friend on here who also became an "accidental insurrectionist." For months post the election he would DM me all types of random graphs and plots that he could not explain. Some of them were youtube vids with some mentally ill person saying word salads clearly making up things as they went along. He kept saying things like "just you wait its coming. "

Please change the title to "Cope Troll thread Number 1776"

 

[Deleted member 592570]

Lmao. It's so blatant.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

Trump and his cultists saying that Biden is a fascist who steals elections and jails his political opponents is the tell to be worried about.

In case some of you out there haven't been paying attention.

No one is saying 'Biden' stole the election. He's a puppet. He probably thinks he actually won.

 

[HOLA]

No one is saying 'Biden' stole the election. He's a puppet. He probably thinks he actually won.

Totally. It was really the ghost of Hugo Chavez. Everyone knows that.

 

[Sinister]

Totally. It was really the ghost of Hugo Chavez. Everyone knows that.

And he did it from the Deep State

 

[Deleted member 592570]

Totally. It was really the ghost of Hugo Chavez. Everyone knows that.

I always forget you guys literally know nothing and just come here to try to do your best Jon Stewart impressions.

 

[sickc0d3r]

"An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign.

The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues. "Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)." The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below. “You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter@Rach_IC.

“This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.” The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings. It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden. The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction. Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed. It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity. Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”"


links to lawsuits and their status listed here:
https://election-integrity.info/2020_Election_Cases.htm

Looks like none of them even alleged any fraud. But, hey, congrats on winning the chance to inspect some ballots and shit. How’d those inspections turn out?

The good news is, Trump’s experiencing first hand what cases with merit really look like.

 

[HOLA]

I always forget you guys literally know nothing and just come here to try to do your best Jon Stewart impressions.

More MAGA projection.

It's not a Jon Stewart impression; Trump's legal team literally blamed Hugo Chavez for messing with the voting machines in a press conference, despite the fact that Chavez died 7 or so years earlier.