Umm Dana needs to do classes because we need to show the seriousness of domestic violenceWhat was the Kevion Iole article? It got lost in the sea of pages and no way am I gonna dig it up
Crazy how many dudes will come on the internet and admit they'd let some girl beat them up. Honestly it’s just sad. Hope you never have to get into a relationship with some abusive female who thinks its cool to put hands on you
Well they should judge them both as equals before the law. If women want to remove chivalry, they shouldn't expect to have special rules for them in court etc.No and thats not how a court in West societies would treat an incident betweem a male and his wife and mother of his children. Get it right.
Maybe between two unknown man/woman but not over a domestic incident.
If a grown ass man cant grasp by himself why there is no "equal treatment" regarding these incidents there we have the overwhelming numbers of females victims of domestic abuse including deaths as opposed to males.
And Im not even saying thats right or wrong just the way it is
I’m pretty sure a lawyer is gonna say she is trying to leave the situation and she defends herself with the initial slap. Not that any of it matters because we aren’t talking court. We are talking about the face of a company (that has a horrible track record of domestic violence) having a video floating around of him striking his wife in public no less. That’s some brazen shit.I think lawyers will says it’s sexist to discriminate your retaliation to assault based on gender.
if he felt a glass was coming to his face after the slap is he now justified? A fist? A kick?
she slapped and he slapped within seconds to prevent a further attack.
if he slapped her and she slapped back would it not be self defence and applauded by the world?
it’s a sexist world where woman have free reign to assault men, let’s be honest, if he hit her and she slapped him, there would be a parade
This just in, domestic abuser defends domestic abuser.Tit for tat situation. If there was a real problem she could easily leave him and walk away with half of their money but shes come out and defended him.
I'd love to see the UFC fight stats on this
He was hit first, why should he step down for retaliation to an assault?
edit- not talking about if a woman has a gun, knife or weapon trying to actively kill me. Then they get roundhoused and uppercut until I can get away.
How did he assault her first???? He held her arm when she turned away. She slapped him. You think that's worthy of getting hit? What if a girl grabbed her partner's arm when they were talking and he just slaps her in the face?Are you a teenager? Do you think it makes you look good to talk like an 8th grader in a locker room? Grow up. He assaulted her first. Deal with it, you are wrong, and continue to run from the specifics of the incident.
Dana himself said his actions were inexcusable. Why are people trying to give him an excuse? He was never in danger enough to retaliate.He was hit first, why should he step down for retaliation to an assault?
Nobody says such a blank statement. If a random woman attacks you, you have the right to defend yourself even if it would be more intelligent to walk away.
The matter here is that no man can ever hit his wife and mother of his kids, which is not a random woman.
That's the incident discussed here. Not a guy in a bar that gets suddenly attacked by an unrelated drunk chick as some retards want to present this.
If you hit your wife and she wants to press charges your are fucked. Period. Let alone if it's more than a single time.
If a grown ass man doesnt understand by himself why the male is more accountable of preventing and handling physical encounters than the female in a relationship has a serious issue (hint: check the overwhelming number of females victims of domestic abuse including deaths in comparison to males) but regardless of any debate in karate forums, saying "bu-bu-but that's sexist" won't save you in front of a court over throwing hands at your wife and mother of your kids. This is what it is.
does anything you said change the fact that he retaliated to an assault? absolutely not.Dana himself said his actions were inexcusable. Why are people trying to give him an excuse? He was never in danger enough to retaliate.
i think the level of outrage would need to be bigger for that.Even if your position is that Dana wasn’t in the wrong or that what he did isn’t that big of a deal, you should know that isn’t realistic. There has to be some kind of consequence and there will be.
WME is a company worth over 10 billion dollars and Dana White is a public figure with ties to ESPN and Walt Disney. You’re out of your mind if you think this is just going to go away.
nothing you said changes the fact that he was retaliating to an assault. technically he's the victim here.The headlines on one of the biggest news sites in Australia was:
"UFC boss slaps wife in shocking footage"
So it is being framed as him assaulting his wife, not retaliating to assault. I agree it is completely wrong, but it is a standard imbalance in how these things are reported in main stream media at large, e.g. male is always the aggressor.