Wow I just noticed I put “indecent contractor” lol
But it’s the same shit the WWE does and it’s completely unfair compared to any other business. They consider everyone who works for them independent contractors, but don’t let them work anywhere else and control them as if they are employees. They have all of the negatives of being an employee, but none of the positives. It flies under the radar because it’s fighting and wrestling and a lot of people have the same mentality you have. If it was any other business or any other sport it wouldn’t be allowed to go on like that.
I don’t get your argument, is it impossible for the fighters to be treated unfairly because they punch people in the face?
The contractor vs employee thing is obviously a big legal issue that will continue to be litigated by all the big companies that are classifying their people are contractors.
We’ll see where it lands in the coming years, I’m honestly not sure what to expect.
There is nothing legally (or in my opinion, ethically) wrong about saying “you are a contractor but you can’t provide similar services to anyone else.” The contractor has the right to say no, and if enough refused the employers would have to reconsider their offers. But there’s nothing fundamentally wrong with it.
And there are good arguments in both directions. For example, one of the things a court will look at is flexibility with respect to when and where you do the work. Other than what, maybe a dozen days a year, these guys can do whatever they want day to day. Some of them won’t do a single thing for the UFC for over a year (Font, Francis, Khamzat, etc.) Half of them have podcasts these days. Some of them coach or own gyms. Krause was doing whatever the hell Krause was doing. The UFC does not monopolize their time and space. They simply say, “I want to pay you to perform a couple times a year, and in exchange for me paying you for that I don’t want you to do the exact same thing for my competitors.”
My point about punching people in the face wasn’t to denigrate what they do. I’m just saying, “what is the intrinsic value to society of punching people in the face?” Without the infrastructure that the promoters provide, it’s an antisocial activity that gets you thrown in jail. The UFC (and other promoters) have turned it into a billion dollar enterprise, so people are willing to take the terms offered to them to participate. If there was no value added and it was just exploitation, nobody would do it. They’d go sell their skills to someone else. But they have a hard time doing it because without a top notch promotion involved what they do has minimal value. So what’s a “fair” price for their services? I have no idea, and that’s my point — “fair” is completely subjective.