Crime Dallas Officer Kills Man in Apartment "She Thought Was Hers"

[Madmick]

I wouldn't say this case proves that cops don't have it easier. Heck, even in this case we saw that Amber was being treated with kids gloves by her fellow officers after the incident. But thankfully it didn't affect the outcome of the trial and justice was served.

Well, you're wrong. This case is an example to the extreme detriment of those who argue they live by a different standard of justice though obviously they are a different class of people with regard to law & order. So are judges, but they don't wield guns, so we hear relatively little caterwauling about them. Only the early handling of the case was mishandled, but it's not like anything about this case was routine. The difference was we actually paid attention. I suspect if we paid this close attention to every case we would witness hundreds of bizarre cases not involving police that would reveal, perhaps to our astonishment, how commonly the uncommon cases are characterized by uncommonly outrageous deviations.

Furthermore, leftists are acutely affected by the inability to notice how often the police have it worse. The Sacramento cops who killed Stephon Clark were just found, in absolute conclusion, to be guilty of no wrongdoing whatsoever, which of course they weren't, and yet the city paid $2m to his kids. This will affect how cops are treated by their superiors, and how they are expected to behave. Why? Because money. Because the city will want to avoid more payouts like that despite that its officers did absolutely nothing wrong. So now their the value placed on their lives becomes cheapened according to the misdeeds of a shitbag in the night who made a series of awful decisions. And the shitbag's kids are rewarded for him being a shitbag on the taxpayer's dime. Yet I hear no outrage whatsoever about that gross injustice from leftists.

Hypocrites.

 

[Madmick]

lol her state of mind? So does that mean in your opinion if someone is under the influence of alcohol or another substance and they commit a crime they should get off because of their state of mind?

So you think she’s completely innocent?

 

[Islam Imamate]

Well, you're wrong. This case is an example to the extreme detriment of those who argue they live by a different standard of justice though obviously they are a different class of people with regard to law & order. So are judges, but they don't wield guns, so we hear relatively little caterwauling about them. Only the early handling of the case was mishandled, but it's not like anything about this case was routine. The difference was we actually paid attention. I suspect if we paid this close attention to every case we would witness hundreds of bizarre cases not involving police that would reveal, perhaps to our astonishment, how commonly the uncommon cases are characterized by uncommonly outrageous deviations.

Furthermore, leftists are acutely affected by the inability to notice how often the police have it worse. The Sacramento cops who killed Stephon Clark were just found, in absolute conclusion, to be guilty of no wrongdoing whatsoever, which of course they weren't, and yet the city paid $2m to his kids. This will affect how cops are treated by their superiors, and how they are expected to behave. Why? Because money. Because the city will want to avoid more payouts like that despite that its officers did absolutely nothing wrong. So now their the value placed on their lives becomes cheapened according to the misdeeds of a shitbag in the night who made a series of awful decisions. And the shitbag's kids are rewarded for him being a shitbag on the taxpayer's dime. Yet I hear no outrage whatsoever about that gross injustice from leftists.

Hypocrites.

Go on now, let it all out.

 

[DespicablePeep]

How do you deter someone from being a dumbass woman, sexting it up? You can only cruelly punish them more than they should be, and nothing will be deterred.

Does this “deterrence” somehow raise people’s IQ’s and common sense?

We should just punish every ignorant buffoon out there even harsher? Cuz that’ll teach em! ?????

She had training and was a cop, probably drunk carrying a gun.

I say fuck her

 

[ScottE]

Because she thought, and the evidence backs this up, she was in HER apartment.

That wouldn't support a manslaughter conviction that would support an acquittal. Luckily the jury didn't consider that a reasonable belief on her part.

It can't be manslaughter with her on the stand saying she went into the apartment gun drawn intending to kill if she found someone in there. If you establish intent to kill it's murder.

 

[Falsedawn]

Go on now, let it all out.

The city had to settle a civil suit, THIS WILL PUT POLICE IN DANGER KAFIR.

<puh-lease75>

My oh my how the once mighty fall. Mick getting rodeo dunked on by everyone.

 

[DespicablePeep]

tfw you get charged with murder after you enter someone elses apartment thinking it was yours and killed them.

hahahahahahah Meme worth

So happy to see a bad person get what they deserve, a good cop would never have done what she did.

 

[shockaholic12]

Clearly murder. She was under no threat, could have easily stepped back and removed herself from the situation. Instead she started blasting away because she wanted to, nothing in this situation would make you feel like you needed to. Responding to a situation where you are confused but not threatened with deadly force is a choice she made.

I can’t go up to a car the same color as mine and shoot the driver and call it manslaughter.

 

[Serenity Now]

I'm here.

Why would I stay away? I've mocked the morons who asserted that our judicial system is racist, that cops are racist, that Amber deliberately went to his apartment that night with a vendetta, and that cute little crying white girls get off no matter what they do to black men: since the get-go. I personally disagree with the verdict, because I think it disqualifies the credible state of mind Guyger possessed in wrongly believing why she was in her own apartment, but at the same time, I understand the message jurors sent; we don't care if you never intended to kill someone that night, and that you believe your life was under threat in your own castle. You were not in your own castle, and your errant state of mind was the result of your own error. Therefore, you are responsible for willfully shooting a man resulting in his death despite any state of mind you possessed.

So much for the bullshit where cops aren't ultimately held to the same standard of justice.

This is clearly the exception....and the sentencing is still not done, if she gets 5 years or something around there, it will be #1 bullshit...so lets wait and see what happens.


Held to the same standard?


There is not fucking way in hell that a citizen will get away with this shit(Shooting a mom/dad/son at a costco)...this guy got no charges, but Im sure it had nothing to do with him being a cop

 

[ScottE]

That a cop was convicted in this case in no way shows that cops aren't treated differently in our criminal justice system. That's a joke of an assertion.

This is the most eggregious example you could possibly think up. Upstanding citizen, in his own home, eating ice cream on the couch, shot as he sits up to see an off duty cop just barging into his apartment. You couldn't put together a more absurd scenario if you tried. Acting like this case is a typical example of instances where people believe police are held to a different lower standard is farcsical.

And even then then the criminal justice system still tried it's best to muddy the water in her favor. An ordinary citizen would have been arrested at the scene. They would have attempted to question an ordinary citizen immediately citizen immediately. They wouldn't have given an ordinary citizen time to delete messages, scrub her apartment, or get a story straight. And in all likelyhood an ordinary citizen wouldn't have compelled a Texas Ranger to attempt to offer complete evidence contradicted testimony on her behalf.

It's not as if they didn't try their darndest to get her off the hook, solely because she's a police officer. It just didn't work because the circumstances were so ridiculously eggregious.

 

[all caps]

Today's stream

 

[Madmick]

This is clearly the exception....and the sentencing is still not done, if she gets 5 years or something around there, it will be #1 bullshit...so lets wait and see what happens.


Held to the same standard?


There is not fucking way in hell that a citizen will get away with this shit(Shooting a mom/dad/son at a costco)...this guy got no charges, but Im sure it had nothing to do with him being a cop

Oh, is it? Please forward me the many cases of a cop killing an unarmed person in his or her own home, not one guilty of a crime or a raid, who weren't charged or convicted of any crime.

Remember, just half a dozen pages back you were on the "white girls turns on the waterworks on the stand never gets time" train. Your racism didn't conform to the reality of the world.

 

[Madmick]

Go on now, let it all out.

You're exactly as promised.

 

[Clear Winner]

That a cop was convicted in this case in no way shows that cops aren't treated differently in our criminal justice system. That's a joke of an assertion.

This is the most eggregious example you could possibly think up. Upstanding citizen, in his own home, eating ice cream on the couch, shot as he sits up to see an off duty cop just barging into his apartment. You couldn't put together a more absurd scenario if you tried. Acting like this case is a typical example of instances where people believe police are held to a different lower standard is farcsical.

And even then then the criminal justice system still tried it's best to muddy the water in her favor. An ordinary citizen would have been arrested at the scene. They would have attempted to question an ordinary citizen immediately citizen immediately. They wouldn't have given an ordinary citizen time to delete messages, scrub her apartment, or get a story straight. And in all likelyhood an ordinary citizen wouldn't have compelled a Texas Ranger to attempt to offer complete evidence contradicted testimony on her behalf.

It's not as if they didn't try their darndest to get her off the hook, solely because she's a police officer. It just didn't work because the circumstances were so ridiculously eggregious.

Well said

 

[Islam Imamate]

That a cop was convicted in this case in no way shows that cops aren't treated differently in our criminal justice system. That's a joke of an assertion.

This is the most eggregious example you could possibly think up. Upstanding citizen, in his own home, eating ice cream on the couch, shot as he sits up to see an off duty cop just barging into his apartment. You couldn't put together a more absurd scenario if you tried. Acting like this case is a typical example of instances where people believe police are held to a different lower standard is farcsical.

And even then then the criminal justice system still tried it's best to muddy the water in her favor. An ordinary citizen would have been arrested at the scene. They would have attempted to question an ordinary citizen immediately citizen immediately. They wouldn't have given an ordinary citizen time to delete messages, scrub her apartment, or get a story straight. And in all likelyhood an ordinary citizen wouldn't have compelled a Texas Ranger to attempt to offer complete evidence contradicted testimony on her behalf.

It's not as if they didn't try their darndest to get her off the hook, solely because she's a police officer. It just didn't work because the circumstances were so ridiculously eggregious.

Yeah exactly, she had her fair share of special treatment though thankfully it didn't save her.

You're exactly as promised.

 

[The XL]

A big reason why we have killer cops that get away with their crimes as often as they do is because they have plenty of passionate apologists who excuse everything that they do.

 

[DespicablePeep]

I'm here.

Why would I stay away? I've mocked the morons who asserted that our judicial system is racist, that cops are racist, that Amber deliberately went to his apartment that night with a vendetta, and that cute little crying white girls get off no matter what they do to black men: since the get-go. I personally disagree with the verdict, because I think it disqualifies the credible state of mind Guyger possessed in wrongly believing why she was in her own apartment, but at the same time, I understand the message jurors sent; we don't care if you never intended to kill someone that night, and that you believe your life was under threat in your own castle. You were not in your own castle, and your errant state of mind was the result of your own error. Therefore, you are responsible for willfully shooting a man resulting in his death despite any state of mind you possessed.

So much for the bullshit where cops aren't ultimately held to the same standard of justice.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Personally, based on what I've seen of the evidence presented at trial, manslaughter would be a more appropriate charge and sentence.

5-7 years, out in 4 with good behavior.

I hope not, she should be in prison for at least five years if not longer. I would like to see her get between 9-15 years, out no sooner than 7 for good behavior but hopefully not much longer than 12. I think that's fair when you recklessly take a man's life in his own home, especially with how selfishly she acted as he lay dying.

 

[Islam Imamate]

The city had to settle a civil suit, THIS WILL PUT POLICE IN DANGER KAFIR.

<puh-lease75>

My oh my how the once mighty fall. Mick getting rodeo dunked on by everyone.

I remember when I used to think he was pretty smart, those were the days. Then I realized that smug, long winded righteous anger is not a substitute for knowledge. Oh well, I still think he's all around a decent poster. Especially with the standard set by the WR.

 

[Leagon]

I went back and watched the scene where Amber cries during testimony, and...she's not crying, lol. She's just not. She's blubbering hard for like a minute and there are no tears, no snot. I thought maybe I just couldn't see anything due to the low resolution, but even when she's offered tissues, she grabs some then sits for another thirty seconds or so without using them. When she finally DOES use them, she just wipes a tiny corner of each eye. Doesn't wipe her cheeks, doesn't wipe under her nose. Just a dab on the corner of each eye after several minutes of hard crying.

I wonder if the jury noticed that and it factored into their ruling. All signs point to her legitimately having no remorse for all this, which is incredible.