Created a MMA fight Picker GPT

[Fight Professor]

One thing to keep in mind is that ChatGPT does not have the latest data. It used to be limited to 2021. I believe the limit has been removed but it is still about a year behind in data processing.

 

[Your Salad]

Fucking A.I. coming for Minty Bets job. What time line am I living in?

 

[TSaL]

One thing to keep in mind is that ChatGPT does not have the latest data. It used to be limited to 2021. I believe the limit has been removed but it is still about a year behind in data processing.

Not So. With building gpt you can have it do internet searches. Also normal gpt4 was updated to April 2023.

 

[TSaL]

UFC 300 Title fight prediction:

Fight Analysis: Zhang Weili vs Yan Xiaonan​

Zhang Weili Profile:​

• Record: 24-3-0
• Height: 5' 4"
• Reach: 63"
• Fighting Style: Muay Thai
• Strengths: High striking rate (5.94 significant strikes landed per minute), diverse striking arsenal (57% to the head, 16% to the body, 27% to the legs), strong submission game (8 wins by submission), excellent takedown defense (67%)
• Recent Performance: Won against Amanda Lemos by unanimous decision, submitted Carla Esparza, KO'd Joanna Jedrzejczyk.

Yan Xiaonan Profile:​

• Record: 17-3-0
• Height: 5'5"
• Reach: 63.0"
• Fighting Out Of: Sacramento, California, USA
• Strengths: Predominantly a striker, significant strikes landed (778 in her career), high decision win rate (52.9% of wins by decision), known for her endurance and volume striking
• Recent Performance: KO victory over Jéssica Andrade, majority decision win against Mackenzie Dern.

Fight Prediction:​

• Scheduled Rounds: 5 (UFC Women's Strawweight Championship)
• Analysis: Both fighters have similar physical attributes. Zhang Weili shows a more diverse skill set with significant ground game, evident in her 8 submission wins. Xiaonan, while formidable in striking, relies heavily on outpointing opponents and lacks submission victories. Weili's high striking rate and takedown defense could neutralize Xiaonan's volume striking approach.
• Key Factors: Weili's versatile striking and proven ground game vs Xiaonan's endurance and striking volume.

Prediction:​

• Winner: Zhang Weili
• Confidence: 75%
• Predicted Method: Decision
• Round: 5

Zhang Weili's well-rounded abilities, particularly her striking versatility and submission threat, give her a significant edge in a five-round championship bout. Xiaonan's endurance and striking volume will make her competitive, but Weili's superior technical skills are likely to prevail in a decision.

 

[ColombianFist]

Here is for if they fought in 2009:
Predicted Winner: Georges St-Pierre (GSP)
Expected Round: 5
Manner of Victory: Decision

Detailed Breakdown for a 2009 Matchup:​

Georges St-Pierre (GSP) - Circa 2009:​

1. Striking Accuracy: 78 - Effective and precise, particularly with his jab and superman punch.
2. Wrestling Ability: 97 - At his peak in wrestling, exceptionally dominant in controlling opponents.
3. BJJ Skills: 85 - Strong defensive and control-oriented BJJ.
4. Cardio and Stamina: 95 - Known for his unparalleled cardio, crucial over 5 rounds.
5. Fight IQ: 96 - Exceptional at devising and adapting strategies mid-fight.
6. Weight Cut: 85 - Efficient, with a well-managed approach to making welterweight.
7. Reach: 76 - Adequate reach, utilized well in combination with his diverse skill set.
8. Training Center/Team: 92 - Trained with some of the best coaches and training partners available.
9. Recent Performance: 93 - In 2009, was at the top of his game, dominating the welterweight division.
10. Mental Strength: 95 - Known for his focus and mental fortitude, especially in high-stakes fights.

Anderson Silva - Circa 2009:​

1. Striking Accuracy: 95 - At his striking peak, with extraordinary precision and power.
2. Wrestling Defense: 80 - Good takedown defense, but not as tested against elite wrestlers like GSP.
3. BJJ Skills: 92 - Offensively very dangerous, with a black belt in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu.
4. Cardio and Stamina: 88 - Reliable cardio, though not as tested in longer, grueling wrestling-based fights.
5. Fight IQ: 94 - Known for his creativity and adaptability, but sometimes prone to underestimating opponents.
6. Weight Cut: 80 - Consistent in making middleweight, with no major issues.
7. Reach: 88 - Significant reach advantage, very effective in his striking game.
8. Training Center/Team: 90 - Trained with top-tier teams, contributing to his well-rounded skills.
9. Recent Performance: 95 - Dominating the middleweight division with spectacular finishes.
10. Mental Strength: 92 - Confident and composed, but occasionally overconfident in his approach.

In this 2009 matchup, both fighters were arguably in their primes. GSP's superior wrestling and game planning give him the edge, allowing him to control Silva and mitigate his striking advantage. Silva's striking and BJJ prowess are significant threats, but GSP's ability to dictate the pace and location of the fight likely leads to a decision victory for him.

So, silva being taller and lankier isn't a factor?

 

[HavokHarmon]

So, silva being taller and lankier isn't a factor?

Weird right? The Hughes vs Silva one had Silva winning because of that even though he only had like 11 fights at the time whereas the GSP one doesn’t even mention it.

 

[TSaL]

So, silva being taller and lankier isn't a factor?

I ran it again:
Georges St-Pierre vs Anderson Silva in 2009:

Fighter Profiles:

1. Georges St-Pierre (GSP):
   • Strengths: Elite wrestling, high fight IQ, exceptional cardio.
   • Weaknesses: Historically less dominant in striking exchanges against elite strikers.
   • Notable Wins: Matt Hughes, BJ Penn.
   • Physical Traits: Strong, athletic, quick transitions between striking and grappling.
2. Anderson Silva:
   • Strengths: Phenomenal striking ability, excellent Muay Thai and boxing skills.
   • Weaknesses: Grappling and wrestling, especially against high-caliber wrestlers.
   • Notable Wins: Rich Franklin, Dan Henderson.
   • Physical Traits: Long reach, fluid movement, unpredictable striking.

Scoring Comparison:

• Striking: Silva's striking diversity and power give him an edge over GSP. Silva: 9/10, GSP: 7.5/10.
• Grappling: GSP's superior wrestling and ground control outweigh Silva's Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. GSP: 9/10, Silva: 7/10.
• Physical Traits: Both fighters have exceptional physical traits for their respective styles. GSP's athleticism in grappling and Silva's striking fluidity and reach are key. GSP: 8.5/10, Silva: 9/10.

Prediction:

• Scheduled Length: 5 rounds (hypothetical super fight).
• Prediction Confidence: 65%.
• Predicted Winner: Georges St-Pierre.
• Round: Decision (5th Round).
• Method of Victory: Decision.

Analysis Summary:In a 2009 matchup between Georges St-Pierre and Anderson Silva, the prediction favors GSP. His elite wrestling and cardio are expected to counter Silva's striking advantage. GSP's ability to control the pace and location of the fight, likely using takedowns and top control, could effectively neutralize Silva's striking threat. Silva's best chance would be to maintain the fight standing and utilize his reach and striking diversity. However, GSP's fight IQ and adaptability make him likely to secure a decision victory by the end of the 5th round. The fight's dynamics would hinge significantly on GSP's ability to execute takedowns and control Silva on the ground, balanced against Silva's striking prowess and defensive grappling.

 

[Nobru]

Created a MMA fight Picker GPT: https://chat.openai.com/g/g-a4l5RVxni-fight-analyst-advanced

I gave it instructions to look at a fighters then compare then on a few different criteria and give them a weighted score from 1-100. I wouldn't use it to bet on fights or anything. Let me know what you think and if you have idea on how to expand it.

Cool, you have made a virtual sherdogger

Good average database and low fight understanding

 

[TSaL]

Cool, you have made a virtual sherdogger

Good average database and low fight understanding

Thanks for sharing your insight

 

[RockyLockridge]

Try it on fights that already happened to see if it's accurate. Also, I was thinking that sometime in the future fights may be judged by artifical intelligence

Do you want a minority report like situation? Because this is how you get minority report like situations

 

[TSaL]

Another UFC 300 fight:
Deiveson Figueiredo vs. Cody Garbrandt - Bantamweight Division
Fight Prediction Analysis:

1. Fighter Profiles:
   • Deiveson Figueiredo:
     • Strengths: Powerful striker, excellent grappling skills, aggressive fighting style.
     • Weaknesses: Can be overly aggressive at times, leading to openings.
     • Key Metrics: High rate of finishes, strong submission skills, good takedown defense.
   • Cody Garbrandt:
     • Strengths: Fast hands, knockout power, good footwork.
     • Weaknesses: Chin durability has been a concern in past fights.
     • Key Metrics: High striking accuracy, knockout power, speed.
2. Scoring Key Factors:
   • Striking: Garbrandt has an edge in speed and precision, but Figueiredo's power is formidable. Garbrandt's chin durability is a concern against a heavy hitter like Figueiredo.
   • Grappling: Figueiredo excels in grappling, posing a significant threat to Garbrandt, especially in submission scenarios.
   • Physical Traits: Both fighters are well-conditioned, but Figueiredo's aggression and physicality could be a key factor.
3. Fight Length and Scoring System Considerations:
   • Scheduled for 3 rounds.
   • Bantamweight division often sees a mix of speed and power, with both fighters capable of finishing fights.
4. Additional Metrics:
   • Striking Diversity: Figueiredo shows a wider variety of strikes.
   • Power Punches Landed: Figueiredo likely to land more significant strikes.
   • Takedown Defense: Garbrandt has decent takedown defense, but Figueiredo’s grappling could still pose a threat.

Prediction:

• Winner: Deiveson Figueiredo
• Confidence: 70%
• Round: 2
• Method of Victory: TKO

Summary:In this bantamweight clash, the striking prowess and speed of Garbrandt face the aggressive, power-based style of Figueiredo
. Figueiredo's ability to blend striking with effective grappling gives him the upper hand. While Garbrandt's speed and precision are notable, his susceptibility to powerful strikes is a critical factor against a fighter like Figueiredo. Figueiredo's diverse striking and potential to land damaging blows, combined with his grappling threat, positions him as the likely winner. The prediction leans towards a TKO victory for Figueiredo in the second round, considering his finishing ability and Garbrandt's past issues with durability.

 

[TSaL]

The upcoming UFC 300 event features a lightweight bout between Jim Miller and Bobby Green. This fight is notable as it marks the fourth time it has been scheduled, with previous bookings in April 2014, February 2021, and July 2022 being canceled due to various reasons involving Green.

• Jim Miller: Miller has a record of 37 wins, 17 losses, and 1 no contest. He recently secured a victory via a third-round face crank submission against Gabriel Benitez at UFC Vegas 84. Earlier in June, he also achieved a knockout win over Jesse Butler in the first round. Miller is recognized for his experience and resilience, being the UFC's all-time leader in wins and appearances.
• Bobby Green: Green's record stands at 31 wins, 15 losses, and 1 no contest. He suffered a loss in his last bout, knocked out in the first round by Jalin Turner at UFC on ESPN 52. However, earlier in 2023, he managed to knock out Grant Dawson in 33 seconds and submitted Tony Ferguson in the third round via an arm-triangle choke.

This fight is part of a stacked UFC 300 card, scheduled for April 13 at the T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas. The event will also feature notable fights such as Justin Gaethje vs. Max Holloway for the BMF title.

Now, let's analyze the fight between Jim Miller and Bobby Green:

1. Experience and Recent Performance: Both fighters are highly experienced, but Miller's recent performance shows a slight edge in grappling and submission skills.
2. Physical Traits: Miller and Green are comparable in size and reach, which should result in a fairly even striking exchange.
3. Striking and Grappling: Miller's submission victory in his last fight suggests a strong grappling advantage, whereas Green's knockout power indicates a potent striking ability.
4. Fight Metrics: Both fighters have shown diversity in their striking and resilience in their careers, but Miller's recent submission wins suggest a higher grappling threat.
5. Fight Length and Weight Class: This lightweight bout is likely scheduled for three rounds, given its placement on the card.

Based on these factors, the prediction is as follows:

• Prediction: Jim Miller to win
• Confidence: 60%
• Predicted Winner: Jim Miller
• Round: 2nd
• Method of Victory: Submission

This prediction takes into account Miller's recent success in grappling and submissions, which might play a crucial role in overcoming Green's striking prowess.

 

[TSaL]

Justin Gaethje vs. Max Holloway - UFC 300 (BMF Title):

Fighter Profiles:

1. Justin Gaethje:
   • Strengths: Devastating knockout power, aggressive striking, strong wrestling base.
   • Weaknesses: Defensive gaps against technical strikers, high strike absorption rate.
   • Recent Performance: Demonstrated resilience and powerful striking in recent bouts.
2. Max Holloway:
   • Strengths: High-volume striking, excellent boxing skills, impressive cardio and durability.
   • Weaknesses: Occasional vulnerability to power shots, less emphasis on grappling.
   • Recent Performance: Showcased superior striking volume and pacing against opponents.

Analysis:

1. Striking:
   • Gaethje brings formidable power, while Holloway excels in volume and accuracy. Holloway likely has an advantage in striking diversity.
2. Grappling:
   • Gaethje has a solid wrestling background, but it’s rarely seen in his fights. Holloway's takedown defense will be crucial.
3. Physical Traits:
   • Both fighters have excellent conditioning; however, Holloway may have a slight edge in terms of endurance.

Scheduled Length: 5 rounds (BMF title fight).

Scoring and Weighting:

• Gaethje is stronger in knockout power and aggression.
• Holloway leads in striking volume, precision, and cardio.

Revised Prediction:

• Confidence: 65%
• Predicted Winner: Max Holloway
• Round: 5
• Method of Victory: Decision

Additional Considerations:

• Weight Class: Likely at lightweight, a familiar territory for Gaethje.
• Holloway’s strategy would likely involve weathering Gaethje’s early power and dominating the later rounds with volume and pace.
• Gaethje’s chance hinges on his ability to connect with significant strikes early and disrupt Holloway's rhythm.

This revised prediction takes into account the full duration of a 5-round fight, anticipating a highly competitive battle that tests both fighters' striking prowess and endurance.

 

[Davidjacksonjones]

It looks like the Lord would guide the Saint to victory over the sinner Paddy.


Fight Analyst Advanced
In a hypothetical UFC matchup between Jon Jones and Paddy Pimblett, the analysis and prediction would be as follows:
Prediction: Jon Jones defeats Paddy Pimblett by submission in the second round.
Analysis:

• Jon Jones:
  • Record:27-1 (10 KOs, 7 submissions). A proven track record with wins over top-tier opponents, showcasing versatility in both striking and grappling.
    • Score: 95
  • Strength of Competition: Has faced and triumphed over numerous former champions and elite fighters.
    • Score: 95
  • Striking Accuracy: Known for precise and impactful strikes, utilizing reach advantage effectively.
    • Score: 90
  • Wrestling Ability: Exceptional wrestling skills, effectively controls opponents on the ground.
    • Score: 95
  • Submission and BJJ Skills: Demonstrated proficiency in submissions, especially against high-level grapplers.
    • Score: 90
  • Weight, Reach, Height: Imposing figure with significant reach and height advantage, using it to control distance.
    • Score: 95
  • Cardio and Stamina: Maintains performance throughout the fight, showing minimal signs of fatigue.
    • Score: 90
  • Fight IQ: Highly strategic, adapts tactics mid-fight to exploit opponents' weaknesses.
    • Score: 95
  • Training Center/Team Quality: Trains with renowned coaches and teammates, constantly evolving skillset.
    • Score: 95
  • Mental Strength: Despite controversies, shows resilience and focus in high-pressure situations.
    • Score: 85
  • Experience: Vast experience in championship fights, well-versed in handling big-fight pressures.
    • Score: 95
  • Additional Factors: Excellent head movement, strong takedown defense, significant knockout power.
    • Score: 90
• Paddy Pimblett:
  • Record:21-3-0 (6 KOs, 9 submissions, 5 decisions). A rising star with a balanced record of finishes and decisions.
    • Score: 85
  • Strength of Competition: Faces increasingly challenging opponents but lacks experience against top-5 fighters.
    • Score: 80
  • Striking Accuracy: Effective striker, though not as refined or varied as elite-level competitors.
    • Score: 85
  • Wrestling Ability: Competent wrestler, but not on par with division-leading wrestlers.
    • Score: 80
  • Submission and BJJ Skills:Strong submission game, particularly with chokes, posing a threat on the ground.
    • Score: 85
  • Weight, Reach, Height: Shorter reach and smaller frame compared to Jones, potentially limiting effectiveness in striking and grappling exchanges.
    • Score: 80
  • Cardio and Stamina: Consistently maintains energy levels, rarely showing signs of fatigue.
    • Score: 85
  • Fight IQ: Demonstrates strategic thinking, but still developing experience in adapting to diverse fighting styles.
    • Score: 85
  • Training Center/Team Quality: Trains with a

solid team, benefiting from good coaching and training partners, yet lacks the same level of elite training environment as Jones.- Score: 85

• Mental Strength: Shows confidence and resilience, but relatively untested in high-pressure scenarios of top-tier fights.
  • Score: 80
• Experience: Rapidly gaining experience, but still far behind Jones in terms of fighting elite opponents and championship bouts.
  • Score: 85
• Additional Factors: Solid striking ability and head movement, but less experienced in dealing with knockouts and sophisticated takedown defenses.
  • Score: 85

Conclusion: In this matchup, Jon Jones's superiority is evident across most metrics. His extensive experience, coupled with his physical advantages and elite-level training, gives him a decisive edge. Pimblett, while talented and improving, still lacks the depth of experience and physical attributes to pose a significant threat to Jones.

Jones's strategic acumen and versatility in both striking and grappling are expected to dominate the fight. He would likely use his reach and diverse striking to manage distance before taking the fight to the ground, where his superior grappling skills would likely lead to a submission victory.
Overall, Jon Jones's well-rounded skill set, physical advantages, and vast experience at the highest levels of the sport make him the clear favorite in this hypothetical matchup.

Nice! I feel Paddy's scores are way too close to Saint Jones lol

 

[Mickey Mick]

Im going to throw a small bet on all of these, if it works out in profit ill increase amounts!

Thanks for the work here, solid effort

Same lol, thanks for this TS and dont worry, If I lose I wont be mad at you!

 

[DrRodentia]

Just nailed the Magny call

 

[DrRodentia]

Nailed the Pennington call. Just need that insane DDP 4th round sub to round it out.

 

[DrRodentia]

Where was that fourth round sub from DDP? Now I've lost $2.

 

[TCE]

Magny by tko round 3. Pennington UD. Du Plessis win.

I'm sold on this now.

 

[TCE]

Where was that fourth round sub from DDP? Now I've lost $2.

yeah like AI is going to predict every single fight result correct. If you think that then you're an idiot.