• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Coronavirus the US GOV'T Response analysis Thread v2

curryjunkie said:
she was sober for a very long time, and today she crashed the minivan...this is why breathalyzers arent necessarily great.....
Click to expand...

Trump could probably say precisely that, and never see the irony about his brother.

Fuckin guy is catastrophically retarded. He's been talking the last two days about how we don't need a vaccine because we're just gonna have some embers and fires. And all the jobs are coming back.

Truly a moron. Just think about supporting him all this time and never seeing that blatant obviousness in everything about him. LOL
 
SBJJ said:
So why does Trump need to say these armed protesters are bad people?

Come on man, you are too smart for this type of bullshit
Click to expand...
The fact that they are armed; I mean how many times do I need to say this.
This wasn't a 2nd amendment protest, so why the firearms? They brought the guns to intimidate.
 
HereticBD said:
Why does it have to be a 2nd amendment protest for guns to be okay in that setting? Why are guns automatically a sign of intimidation and not protection? You know what you rarely, if ever see? Armed protesters getting bullied by riot squads, or hit in the head with bike locks from "counter protesters".
Click to expand...

Why do you need guns to protest a lock down, you are not protesting an infringement of your 2nd amendment. Guns are there to intimidate. Some Michigan lawmakers have resorted to wearing bullet-proof vests because of these armed individuals. One Michigan Rep resorted to being escorted by armed volunteers.

And it is pretty ridiculous to claim counter-protesters would have attacked them, when you have no evidence of this . Not every anti-lockdown protesters had some armed members amongst them, yet they weren't attacked. Some of these anti lockdown protesters got right up in the face of a Michigan Rep and were screaming / yelling at her, which is endangering her life with their breadth. So the bullies here are some of these obnoxious protesters.
 
HereticBD said:
Quite the whiner you are.

"OMG people had guns! Why isn't Trump saying these people are evil, and appealing to my own personal bias?"
Click to expand...
Says the guy who always retors with TDS when his chieftan is criticised. You are like a bee defending its queen.
 
MicroBrew said:
Why do you need guns to protest a lock down, you are not protesting an infringement of your 2nd amendment.
Click to expand...

Because the 2nd amendment gives them the right to do so. Do you think that shit only matters when it's under threat? They fight for that right, so they can protect themselves in situations like these.

Notice how no riot squads are beating the shit out them, and macing them when they're detained? Yeah, that's because they've fought for the right to brandish guns in these situations, for protection from a government who could kick them around and shut them the fuck up, otherwise.

I'm not even a pro-gun guy, but the fact that you fail to grasp the general purpose of the 2nd amendment, speaks volumes.

Oh' and PS:

How many people have been shot by these very dangerous individuals participating in these protests?
 
HereticBD said:
Because the 2nd amendment gives them the right to do so. Do you think that shit only matters when it's under threat? They fight for that right, so they can protect themselves in situations like these.

Notice how no riot squads are beating the shit out them, and macing them when they're detained? Yeah, that's because they've fought for the right to brandish guns in these situations, for protection from a government who could kick them around and shut them the fuck up, otherwise.

I'm not even a pro-gun guy, but the fact that you fail to grasp the general purpose of the 2nd amendment, speaks volumes.

Oh' and PS:

How many people have been shot by these very dangerous individuals participating in these protests?
Click to expand...

I am pro 2nd amendment, so don't tell me about not what I grasp and do not grasp.

Just because the 2nd gives them the right does not mean they don't deserve criticism and they aren't trying to intimidate. Notice I never said they are violating the law, I said they are trying to intimidate and are being bullies.

Who the hell is the kicking around the unarmed protesters in parts of the country where there weren't armed protestesters ? You conveniently forget about this. The only ones trying to bully here are the armed protesters and the ones getting up close and screaming at people like the Michigan Rep I mentioned earlier, which you also conveniently ignore.

Are you really claiming that to intimidate you need to shoot a person or shoot at all ? You know you can threaten and intimidate people just by prominently displaying the firearms.
 
MicroBrew said:
I am pro 2nd amendment
Click to expand...

No, you clearly are not, as you view guns in this situation as a form of intimidation.

If you were pro 2nd amendment, you would not be protesting their right to bear arms.

Give it a rest, clown.
 
MicroBrew said:
I am pro 2nd amendment, so don't tell me about not what I grasp and do not grasp.

Just because the 2nd gives them the right does not mean they don't deserve criticism and they aren't trying to intimidate. Notice I never said they are violating the law, I said they are trying to intimidate and are being bullies.

Who the hell is the kicking around the unarmed protesters in parts of the country where there weren't armed protestesters ? You conveniently forget about this. The only ones trying to bully here are the armed protesters and the ones getting up close and screaming at people like the Michigan Rep I mentioned earlier, which you also conveniently ignore.

Are you really claiming that to intimidate you need to shoot a person or shoot at all ? You know you can threaten and intimidate people just by prominently displaying the firearms.
Click to expand...

I wonder if the Unite The Right "protests" in Charlottesville could've gotten away with their terrorism if they had just said it was a 2A protest.

These people march on the state capital while armed, have no demands, yet they're there to "talk" and we have retards from other nations like @HereticBD trying to tell us what's up after repeatedly making an absolute fool of himself in these threads.
 
HereticBD said:
No, you clearly are not, as you view guns in this situation as a form of intimidation.

If you were pro 2nd amendment, you would not be protesting their right to bear arms.

Give it a rest, clown.
Click to expand...
You lie again , as you clearly ignored the countless posts over the years where I have expressed support for the 2nd and opposed attempts to infringe upon it.

I am not protesting the right to bear arms , I am criticising their intention to do so in this context. Can you try being honest?
 
MicroBrew said:
I am not protesting the right to bear arms , I am criticising their intention to do so in this context. Can you try being honest?
Click to expand...

Okay, I got it now. You're not "protesting", you're just "criticizing".

LOL.

If you are truly pro-2nd, you would not find fault in them bearing arms in this situation, as it is their right.

Your argument in a nutshell is essentially: "I'm pro 2nd amendment, I just don't like these guys brandishing guns."

That's like saying "I'm pro gay rights, I just don't want men fucking each other."

My God...
 
HereticBD said:
Okay, I got it now. You're not "protesting", you're just "criticizing".

LOL.

If you are truly pro-2nd, you would not find fault in them bearing arms in this situation, as it is their right.

Your argument in a nutshell is essentially: "I'm pro 2nd amendment, I just don't like these guys brandishing guns."

That's like saying "I'm pro gay rights, I just don't want men fucking each other."

My God...
Click to expand...
Your first sentence is a strawman, since my argument has been that Trump should have criticsed the firearms carrying protesters.

You only think in black and white, no surprise really. You can't seem to understand a person can be pro 2nd and not agree with everything done by the pro gun crowd. Your inability to see shades of grey is not my fauly, it is a quality lacking in you.
 
MicroBrew said:
Your first sentence is a strawman, since my argument has been that Trump should have criticsed the firearms carrying protesters.
Click to expand...

He should criticize them for exercising their 2nd amendment rights...why?

You only think in black and white, no surprise really. You can't seem to understand a person can be pro 2nd and not agree with everything done by the pro gun crowd. Your inability to see shades of grey is not my fauly, it is a quality lacking in you.
Click to expand...

Yeah, yeah, yeah, you're pro 2nd amendment, but you just don't like those rights being exercised. Gotcha.
 
HereticBD said:
He should criticize them for exercising their 2nd amendment rights...why?
Click to expand...
They broke state law by not socially distancing and without a mask, thats illegal and Trump shouldnt be complimenting their actions
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,271,083
Messages
57,701,392
Members
175,810
Latest member
lawfulgood

Share this page

Back
Top