Media Conor McGregor says he has agreed to fight Logan Paul in a boxing exhibition

Who would win?


  • Total voters
    145
Conor cut water from the dieted down low 170s when he was a featherweight (he publicly hit the scales at 172 about a week before weigh-ins once) and he did juice, extensively, after his injury, becoming quite noticeably bigger.

Logan Paul is billed at 205 in the WWE, which has never billed a fighter at below his actual weight, and he weighed in at 194.4 for his boxing match with Dillon Danis last year.

Paul and Conor are, in fact, roughly the same weight.
Lol Logan is much bigger than Conor, weight alone is not everything.

Still, Floyd is even smaller and he played with Logan so thats not an excuse for a double champ like Conor.
 
conor will get embarrassed again. he cash strapped or something
 
If it's an exhibition, why even ask the question who will win?

O% chance of happening. Less even.
 
There’s a lot of trolling here.. and ppl talking mad shit.. Connor a rapist? That is wild. Ban these clowns
 
Lol Logan is much bigger than Conor, weight alone is not everything.

Still, Floyd is even smaller and he played with Logan so thats not an excuse for a double champ like Conor.

This is not double champ Conor, this is 2024 substance abuse, post-leg injury, dropped sponsors Conor. Floyd is actually the opposite of Conor in how he treats his body. He's famous for not partaking in drugs or even any alcohol, that's why he's still in great shape in his late 40s while Conor looks like he's aged himself a decade in 3 years.

Don't think this fight will happen but it'd be fitting for him to lose a boxing match to Logan Paul to signify how much he's fallen.
 
I cant believe people keep falling for these "fights". Theyre obviously pre-determined huge cash grabs for extremely low effort fights. Stop supporting them
 
A person who can't knowingly consent can't consent. Sex without consent is rape. That's not my book or just common opinion, that's the law. Your opinion remains outside of the law. That's why people think you're a rape apologist, because you say, "What is a guy supposed to do, not rape someone?"
Lol no it s more nuanced than that. That‘s taking „believe all women“ a little too far.

But thanks for highlighting the case here and making people realise who weak of a case it is. Her word against his, and her word is worth shit.

Oh and btw, using already made combination of words like „rape apologist“ doesn‘t work on me. Sounds like „victim shaming“ and other stupid shit feminists came up with these last years.
 
I cant believe people keep falling for these "fights". Theyre obviously pre-determined huge cash grabs for extremely low effort fights. Stop supporting them
Touch butt in the park?

Touch butt after dark.
 
Back
Top