- Joined
- Nov 2, 2017
- Messages
- 10,033
- Reaction score
- 10,071
Yeah, anyone who looks into the details of Tyson's alleged rape would have plenty of reasonable doubt.That wasn't necessarily the case with Mike at the time, remembering back then, time has ways of revealing things.....
From what I can remember off the top of my head:
1. The accuser made a false rape allegation in the past, but the witness wasn't allowed to testify.
2. Eyewitnesses said that she was sitting on Tyson's lap and kissing him, but they too were not allowed to testify.
3. She claimed that Tyson was forcing himself on her in the limo on the way to the hotel, yet still followed him up to his hotel room (Tyson's lawyer didn't point this out in the trial).
4. She went into the hotel bathroom to remove her pantyliner (this too was also not pointed out by Tyson's lawyer).
5. The hotel bathroom had a telephone, where she could've easily called hotel security, but she didn't (Tyson's lawyer also didn't point this out).
Points 1 & 2 are also relevant in countering the prosecution's narrative of making the victim appear like an innocent/vulnerable/angelic virgin.
Points 3, 4, & 5 are also a result of Don King hiring a lawyer who helped with getting him a tax discount and had no experience with rape trials.

Brutal but honest and truthful assessment.