News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

As a person who has no tattoos --

I can understand having a tattoo of beloved pet faces,

but human faces?
My take is you can get a tattoo of people if it is your kid or parents.. They will always be your kids and parents. The wife/husband is a no no.. They may not always be your wife/husband....My wife gets mad at me constantly when i give this take...
 
Replaced by Khabib murals.

post-partying is weakness for the soul era Connor was a bad role model for the kids anyway with the ridiculous partying/degenerate lifestyle. Though I reckon he was a lunatic degen from the start.
I knew him in Iceland before/while he was getting big (training at Mjolnir with Gunnar). He was way more normal, although always seemed to be the insecure type. Not surprised, at all, that it all went to his head.
 

Conor fans not happy:

1e6ae-17326888387260-1920.jpg



 
he was found liable a few days ago...
So..

But good on you supporting your man.
I am sure he will thank you

Innocent until found quality bro
No
Innocent until found liable
Conor is cancelled. It's over.
Elon Musk will buy Connor
Today I learned that rape is a partisan issue.

The judge was politically motivated. It was set up.

Ah yes. Because holding rapists accountable for their actions is exclusively a left wing thing.

See above.
 
I generalize the law like this:

If you make $100k on a sponsorship deal, and that's a lot of money to you, then you had better damn well honor your morality clause. Because your sponsor can and will terminate your contract and refuse to pay you. And they will get away with it, because you simply won't be able to afford the legal battle to sue them in court.

But if you make $10 million on a sponsorship deal, and you're McGregor rich, then your sponsor will ultimately settle with you and pay out a % of the contract, because you can afford to sue them in court and you will likely win (in my opinion McGregor would win).

As for legal contracts voiding the obligation to pay in lieu of morality clause violations, you'd be surprised how often contract clauses don't matter in court. Just because you put something in a contract, doesn't mean it's legal. If you make a contract to loan someone $100k and say they legally become your slave if they fail to repay you, that's obviously not legally enforceable. And there is a whole spectrum of grey areas between legal and illegal that might not hold up in court, which ultimately depend on the judges you get (roll of the dice).
Since we don't know what's in his contract, it's kind of idle speculation to say what would happen in court. Putting a termination clause into a contract IS legal, it just has to be written in strong legal language, and the incident has to be a legit violation of the clause as it was written. The NFL cuts people for that without pay, and I'm sure they have a lot of good lawyers on the case that say it is permissible (it's been tested a lot in the NFL). The union challenges the NFL on them, but the player can be cut if the violation meets the standard of the contract language.

An even better example is Kanye West. He fell out of the billionaire's club with his losses over anti-sematic statements, and that is publicly confirmed. And he has a lot of money to pay lawyers to take it to court.

 
Just to clarify dem was Conor murals not Dakota ones I'm sure dem keep his up bro nuh civil rapist iirc

 
They already declined to press charges because he’d be found not guilty in a criminal trial.

No they THOUGHT he would probably be found not guilty. They don't know that.

It's probably all money based. As in, the government don't want to invest the time, money and resources for what they think will be a waste of time. Or, that department doesn't.

But, that should be criminal in itself, the chick wanted to press charges... she should be able to. The DDP should be accountable to some outside party, or 2nd opinion on whether 'there's enough evidence', It seems perhaps the system in Ireland, especially regarding sexual assault type shit is... unless there's a fkn video of the assault happening... there's 'not enough evidence'. All you should need is probable cause, likelyhood, a credible and willing witness... and you had all that;

You have a battered, bruised woman with a tampon jammed up her fkn vagina, who went straight to a rape treatment unit, crying and in shambles, wanting to press criminal charges. Who had just been with a man (provably), right before what clearly appears to be a physical, sexual assault - who has been accused by multiple other women - and has his DNA in you. I'd say that's a pretty good fucking case. If not, wtf else do you need? Like I say, other than a video of the fkn assault happening.
 
No they THOUGHT he would probably be found not guilty. They don't know that.

It's probably all money based. As in, the government don't want to invest the time, money and resources for what they think will be a waste of time. Or, that department doesn't.

But, that should be criminal in itself, the chick wanted to press charges... she should be able to. The DDP should be accountable to some outside party, or 2nd opinion on whether 'there's enough evidence', It seems perhaps the system in Ireland, especially regarding sexual assault type shit is... unless there's a fkn video of the assault happening... there's 'not enough evidence'. All you should need is probable cause, likelyhood, a credible and willing witness... and you had all that;

You have a battered, bruised woman with a tampon jammed up her fkn vagina, who went straight to a rape treatment unit, crying and in shambles, wanting to press criminal charges. Who had just been with a man (provably), right before what clearly appears to be a physical, sexual assault - who has been accused by multiple other women - and has his DNA in you. I'd say that's a pretty good fucking case. If not, wtf else do you need? Like I say, other than a video of the fkn assault happening.
^^^^^^^^This guy gets it
 

She lives a life of luxury and is not looking to give that up no matter what Conor does with other women.

The fact she is still his "fiancee" after over a decade may play a part as well in not being guaranteed a share of his finances if they did split.

That's how Jones has his woman locked down. Although I feel Dee is complicit with Conor, while Jones fiancee is a straight up victim (was literally viciously beat by him.)
 
Back
Top