so, american buddies, does trump have a chance in this? i only saw a couple of polls and clinton is waaay ahead.
so, american buddies, does trump have a chance in this? i only saw a couple of polls and clinton is waaay ahead.
It's interesting, every presidential election the discussion of the validity of polls comes up and the answer is always the same: They're pretty good. Despite this, inane conspiracy theories get spun and poor reasoning gets employed to validate someone's particular desires. Here's it's pretty clear: Trump only has an outside chance and Clinton is the favorite.Generally, I think betting odds and 538 are the best easily available guides, and they both have him with about a 20% chance at this time.
House effects /= "manipulation." He actually explained it.
And that was what I was initially commenting on. People see normal stuff they don't understand, and immediately jump to the idea that there is some kind of conspiracy behind the scenes. It's a very natural, very human reaction, but it's one that education should fix.
What education, because I think you mean conditioning.
It isn't that they don't understand it, it is that their is a lack of information to make an informed decision. You assume all is well and good in the world, while others assume the Illuminate, Free Masons, and aliens control the world.
The truth is somewhere in between.
The gap between Rasmussen and other polls is getting wider. Rasmussen has Trump at +2 while reuters and pew have Clinton at +11 and +9.
http://www.people-press.org/files/2016/07/07-07-16-Voter-attitudes-topline-for-release.pdf
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch
http://www.ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=15725
Nevada is notoriously hard to poll for a few reasons and Dems have been under represented in them for the last handful of years.Here's some overall stats about the state of the election and a poll showing Clinton with a 4 point lead in Nevada.
http://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/MonmouthPoll_NV_071116/
Rasmussen generally leans right by a pretty heavy margin, a lot of commentators really fucked themselves over by using their polls during the last election, I think it was Glen Beck that predicted a 320 delegate landslide by Romney by using their polls.House effect for Rasmussen is something on the order of 5-7 ... Don't quote that but Ras always does this and then a few weeks before the election dials it in a bit so as not to get a terrible grade.
I think a lot of Trump fans are lying low. Once they get to the ballot box, they will pan the area and check Trump.
It's the Clinton News Network.I love it, CNN just ran a breaking news story
The headline reads: Clinton: Trump not qualified to be president
Lol, wtf?
It's the Clinton News Network.