Literally,
Someone who knows someone said that they said...
And yet here they are, falling for it again.
What else would you expect from the brainlet left...
Circling The Arguments (SCO thread v. 32)
- Thread starter Quipling
- Start date
- Status
Literally,
Someone who knows someone said that they said...
And yet here they are, falling for it again.
What else would you expect from the brainlet left...
Why would anyone expect anything actionable to come of it? Barr wrote a calculated, overly narrow-scope letter, but he wouldn't have actually lied about what actually did include re: charges. Although I reckon it will be up to some amount of debate considering a number of lawyers that have commented on his interpretation of 'corrupt intent'.
I don't think going after Trump legally is a good move unless there was a serious bombshell in there which I doubt. I definitely want to see the report though.
It probably says no collusion, no obstruction either, but the pee pee tape is real
That’s a really long way of saying “you’re right Bob”.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2015
- Messages
- 26,650
- Reaction score
- 10
YOu are nothing but a pure troll at this point. Sadly not a smart one. Claim no one wants to see the report and then someone shows you 84% of people do and you act like that somehow vindicates you.
Yeah, you wanted trump to be impeached too...
When are liberals going to learn nobody gives a fuck what you want?
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2006
- Messages
- 37,448
- Reaction score
- 17,278
Do me a favor, now post every exit poll listing voters concerns. You know the ones where Russia was at the absolute bottom.
The average American doesn’t give a shit about Muh Russia.
Oh no, pressure builds????
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,794
- Reaction score
- 2,633
More like 'you are repeatedly knocking down strawmen Bob'That’s a really long way of saying “you’re right Bob”.
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,794
- Reaction score
- 2,633
Pretty wild how fast the GOP house flipped from 420-0 when they knew senate turtle would block it, to a party line vote on seeing that report. What is the official reason there?
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,336
- Reaction score
- 68,518
"Some members told associates..."
Do you ever take a pause and realize just how easy it is for the media to just print whatever the fuck, and have you lap it up without hesitation as long as it fits your narrative?
I remind you, the Mueller team officially spoke out against false reporting over little Micheal Cohen. Oh', but the NYT "heard some people say some shit". Yep, sounds legit. You guys are brain dead.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2015
- Messages
- 26,650
- Reaction score
- 10
“Some investigators”
When are you gullible doofuses gonna stop falling for this shit?
If Meullers report was being misrepresented, he wouldn’t just sit by and let it happen.
Mueller still works for Barr. Others do not. They have moved on.
Barr is entitled to his opinion and view on the Mueller report even if Mueller disagrees with the characterization. Barr is a seasoned lawyer, who knows how to play word games. He is not going to lie or misrepresent the report in a way that he cannot say 'as was my opinion'.
In an instance like that it not up to Mueller to come out to the press to say 'well my opinion differs from my boss'. That would be insubordination at best and a firing offense at worse.
Mueller will get his chance when he is called before Congress and just like he did not talk to the press prior, you should not expect him to now.
Those on Muellers team who moved on are free to offer their views now. And some are. And they are making it clear that in their view Barr is not representing things as they see it.
These are just differences of opinion and both sides are allowed theirs. But the fact that the guys immersed in this for 2 years see it differently than Barr suggests others will too.
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
- Messages
- 6,580
- Reaction score
- 1,261
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,336
- Reaction score
- 68,518
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2002
- Messages
- 19,737
- Reaction score
- 4,941
Oh no, pressure builds????
The walls are closing in.
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,794
- Reaction score
- 2,633
The difference is Barr didn't state falsehoods. Doesn't mean his letter was not representative of the report and intentionally super narrow in scope. Do you really find the articles claims hard to believe?
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
- Messages
- 6,580
- Reaction score
- 1,261
The Report will be released soon enough.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 25,248
- Reaction score
- 21,743
Its also notable this is the first time anyone from the sco has leaked to the press
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,336
- Reaction score
- 68,518
Yes. I think the NYT knows what their readers want to hear, and saying that they've "heard some folks say some stuff" that conveniently lines up with the narrative their Liberal cult has been imagining since the Mueller report dropped, is no coincidence. Funny how they've had no insight into the Mueller team's insights until now, don't ya think?
It's click bait. I don't know how anyone can be so dumb as to not see it.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2015
- Messages
- 26,650
- Reaction score
- 10
Reading comprehension has never been your friend. Just as thinking has not.
Barr being a Trump appointee hack who advertised for the job can have his view and opinion. No one would think anyone would agree with bobgeese's interpretation of the report because bob is so tightly clenched to Trumps nuts his visions is blurry. But bob is still entitled to his view.
However if the investigators who spent two years hold a different opinion that will be very significant to others. As it should be.
- Status
