probably true. Oh well, try making the argument Congress isn't allowed to see classified materials then. Sure that will go over well.The likelihood that one of the Democrats in Congress would leak the President's personal information is pretty much 100%.
If the chances are nil for this challenge to make its way all the way to the Supreme Court, then the chances are nil for the Democrats getting a fully unredacted report.
Brett considers himself a Constitutionalist and this would shatter the Constitution if they blocked it.
it would literally make the Congress (not just this one but all future) impotent in doing their Constitutional role of proving a Check and Balance to the POTUS. Any future POTUS who was suspected of a crime would just need to keep firing AG's until they got one who would do their bidding and then Congress would be blocked from doing their role.
i know in your love of Trump's nut you cannot see around them to see how damaging this would be to the US in general and because you love Trump so much you just don't care.
For one minute you need to unclench the nuts and open your eyes and look out beyond Trump.
You need to try and think beyond Trump and to the next Dem POTUS you hate.
and I quote from your article:
this sounds a lot more like hope than reality. We'll just have to wait and see. I don't care what it says, I just want to see it. You seem to care what it says and don't.. Shocking revelations.
No one is arguing there should not be redactions. NO ONE.
I am betting that a number of the indictments/pleas directly involve russia, and not via a conspiracy theory requiring multiple convaluted links. Instead it will show that the indicted people were acting on behalf of the Russian government.
The special counsel investigated the accusations, and found the accusations to be lacking.
The Senate approved Attorney General made the final determination. You're aware the AG needs to be confirmed by the people's elected representatives in the Senate, correct?
The President has been vindicated and cleared of any wrongdoing, the Democrats in the house have no right to see the personal and private information of an innocent man. The Supreme Court with Brett Kavanaugh would have no choice but to strike down the Democrats attempt at gaining the full and unredact report in the name of preserving an individual's right to privacy, and so overzealous prosecutors can't publicly humiliate people that they failed to convict.
The Democrats will either accept the redacted report like adults, or be made to look like sore losers crying over sour grapes all over again. I assure you, the latter isn't a good look going into 2020.
The problem is how do determine if the redactions Barr makes will be legally required or if he'll redact more than necessary. I suspect Mueller will have to testify to clear things up if Congress doesn't win their subpoena request.
no one is saying the full unredacted report so take that strawman elsewhere. You are trying to set this up so that when they get the report with only the required redactions re-ongoing investigation, and national security stuff and what else is REQUIRED to be redacted you can claim a win. No one, NO ONE, expects that stuff to be released.
House dems just made formal request that requires zero Republican approval to get 6 years of tax returns...personal, business and foundation.
This is about get awful lol...
