• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Media Chris Weidman's finish (technical decision win) GIFS

KazDibiase

"My style is kneeing people in the face."
@Silver
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Messages
12,080
Reaction score
53,238
MOD NOTE: Please refrain from over the top fighter bashing comments like wanting Chris to get another serious injury. It's not allowed. Also, an unsubstantiated accusation of steroids and PEDs is fighter bashing and could get you yellow card infractions.

giphy-downsized-large.gif
giphy-downsized-large.gif
giphy-downsized-large.gif
giphy-downsized-large.gif
giphy.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Should've been a dq win for Bruno. That's dirty as hell.

I love Chris, but bro.


That isn't how rules work in an incidental foul.

TS is materially wrong calling this a "TKO" as it was formally announced on the broadcast the commission recalled the stoppage and judged the fight a decision win for Chris - at this point you can only call a decision up to the foul. Even with a point deduction, Silva still lost the first two rounds.
 
That isn't how rules work in an incidental foul.

TS is materially wrong calling this a "TKO" as it was formally announced on the broadcast the commission recalled the stoppage and judged the fight a decision win for Chris - at this point you can only call a decision up to the foul. Even with a point deduction, Silva still lost the first two rounds.
It was the 3rd and 4th pokes. Enough for a DQ.
 
That isn't how rules work in an incidental foul.

TS is materially wrong calling this a "TKO" as it was formally announced on the broadcast the commission recalled the stoppage and judged the fight a decision win for Chris - at this point you can only call a decision up to the foul. Even with a point deduction, Silva still lost the first two rounds.
I made a mistake my bad
 
That isn't how rules work in an incidental foul.

TS is materially wrong calling this a "TKO" as it was formally announced on the broadcast the commission recalled the stoppage and judged the fight a decision win for Chris - at this point you can only call a decision up to the foul. Even with a point deduction, Silva still lost the first two rounds.

Chris eyepoked him 4 times...
 
That isn't how rules work in an incidental foul.

TS is materially wrong calling this a "TKO" as it was formally announced on the broadcast the commission recalled the stoppage and judged the fight a decision win for Chris - at this point you can only call a decision up to the foul. Even with a point deduction, Silva still lost the first two rounds.
3 times isn't incidental
 
That isn't how rules work in an incidental foul.

TS is materially wrong calling this a "TKO" as it was formally announced on the broadcast the commission recalled the stoppage and judged the fight a decision win for Chris - at this point you can only call a decision up to the foul. Even with a point deduction, Silva still lost the first two rounds.
Why cant you use replay to see that not 1 but 2 blatant fouls were made in sucession? That should merit a DQ because you couldnt stop the fight for the 2nd foul point deduction given it happened rapidly. Its a DQ in my mind no doubt
 
That isn't how rules work in an incidental foul.

TS is materially wrong calling this a "TKO" as it was formally announced on the broadcast the commission recalled the stoppage and judged the fight a decision win for Chris - at this point you can only call a decision up to the foul. Even with a point deduction, Silva still lost the first two rounds.


that's not how it works. how is that an incidental foul

Weidman eye poked him freaking three times and technically fOUR times in one fight, the last of which ended the fight.

that's a dq.
 
Back
Top