i beat a whole shit load of people from india yesterday. i guess they like chess over there because i'm getting more opponents from india than america. made just about all of them rage quit. i'm making everybody rage quit. hell i'm at over 340 games under my belt now in under a week, because almost everybody rage quits on me as soon as i start fucking up their shit.
on top of my 8-15 second scholars mates, these games are all ending hella fast. all it takes is a capture of their queen and sometimes even just their rook or both knights or bishops and they simply just fold. whereas i've made all kinds of fuck ups and i stay in it, some of the games i end up winning, others i have got my ass kicked. and some end in a draw or stalemate, or better yet a win for me after my opponents run out of time trying to chase down my king! they must get so fucking pissed when they offer up a draw in the last minute of the game and i decline. you were in no hurry to make your moves for the first 8 minutes of the game, it's your own damn fault. hurry up! or jaldee karo as they say in hindi.
but then again my opponents fuck up just as much as i do in the game, and at a professional level i guess one or two big mistakes and you're probably fucked no matter what hey? there's no point of sticking around just to rely on your opponent making some epic blunders right after you did, just so that you can get back into the game.
i don't know what it is. i try to give these people a fast and fair game. the last guy rage quit on me after i trolled the fuck out of him by paying no mind to any of my other pieces on the board, and i simply just moved my king all around the board while he relentlessly pursued me. i captured one of his bishops and then his queen and that was it for him, he didn't want anymore of that smoke.
check that one out:
idyb2025 (391) vs esklebbt222 (369). idyb2025 won - game abandoned in 25 moves. Click to review the game, move by move.
www.chess.com
only 8 blunders this time. i guess my chess game is getting more on point!
i guess losing his queen and bishop was just too much to handle and it was clear to him that he has lost the game, when all i was doing was moving my king around the board.
my king is no threat to his. does he really need to have a queen on the board just to checkmate an unguarded king that is just out for its morning stroll along the chess board? there's no need to just give up just yet. bro, when i'm playing serious i'm straight up trading queens with you as early as i can, on top of every other piece you have, even if i only capture an extra pawn in the process, or even nothing at all. i'll go knight for bishop or vice versa all day long with you too! i know it's probably stupid, but it will make it harder for you to chase my pawns around the board during endgame and i might run you out of time!
if you can't win without a queen, then best of luck to you i guess. just try to promote a pawn or something and go get another one. no need to quit out on me just because it's early on in the game and you don't have a queen.
what does he think i'm going to do? fuck him up with my king like i did to the last few guys? bro i just started playing this shit last week and the way that i see things, my king is never threatened. my king is the one who does the threatening. the rest of my pieces are all a bunch of spineless cowards who are too afraid to stand and bang in the pocket. my king has a set of balls and he gives them a tug. my king is battle hardened. he doesnt cower and hide behind an entire army and high tail it outta there every time that he senses any threat!
anyways, i don't know what this strategy that i employed is called, but this one paid off too! make sure to like and subscribe for more chess tips and strategies!