it is when i'm not there.And it's not vacant.
it is when i'm not there.And it's not vacant.
how does the government get the houses?they wouldn't be other peoples houses. they would be the government's.
Yeah, but you live there part-timeit is when i'm not there.
Do seatbelts stop all deaths in car accidents?
They buy it for a fair pricehow does the government get the houses?
So require people who drive them to have licenses and wear seatbelts?So ban cars?
they have to buy it in a competitive environment to get it at a fair price. or overpay.They buy it for a fair price
either seizing them or buying them for pennies on the dollar.how does the government get the houses?
it's almost like ares and i can have differing viewpoints on something.Because it's obviously not a serious discussion. Not even sure what the point is of nutbars trying to argue that the government should seize people's homes to give to illegals.
You were just a few minutes too early before @KAZSoliloquy came in and blew that up, and admitted that yes, he does consider 2nd homes that people use seasonally to be "vacant", and should be seized by the government and given to illegals.
I say we start with Bernie Sanders and Laticia James and confiscate all of their properties to move hobos and illegals into.
How very disingenuous
So joking about 9/11 but not mentioning that anyone actually died would be totally fine?
They dramatically reduce them
So you agree, everyone who buys a gun should have a license?
I am aware. And it was making light of all the people who died when those buildings were bombed.The joke was about no more tall buildings to toss the gays from.
I am aware. And it was making light of all the people who died when those buildings were bombed.
It would be the other 2 that you consider "vacant". Bernie has 3 houses, and 2 of them are in a state that consistently ranks in the top 5 homeless populations per capita. Could easily confiscate those and let a few junkies live in them.it's almost like ares and i can have differing viewpoints on something.
also lol @ seizing bernie's one $400K house that he lives in.
It absolutely was. Charlie Kirk was an asshole.I dont think it was.
You mean dying? You think people just lost their homes?I think it was insensitive to laugh about people losing their homes,
Yeah fuck those "comedians" toobut no more so than the hundreds of comedians who koked about bombing Afghanistan back to the stone age. "1 bomb. Oops, we're done."
TLDRIt would be the other 2 that you consider "vacant". Bernie has 3 houses, and 2 of them are in a state that consistently ranks in the top 5 homeless populations per capita. Could easily confiscate those and let a few junkies live in them.
Well then if you do have "differing viewpoints" from @Ares Black , then it's back to square one for him because that cuts the number of "vacant housing units" in half, so even with your comical estimate of "11-14 million" illegals that only counts the ones who sent the card back to the census bureau, you're still about 8 million houses short, and that doesn't count the millions who didn't return a census card, doesn't count the 1.2 million people Biden gave temporary status to, doesn't count the 2.5 million with open asylum claims, and doesn't count any future illegals who will come flooding in to get free houses, so where are these extra houses supposed to come from?
For entertainment's sake, what do you suppose housing being at 100% capacity or millions over capacity would do for home and rent prices for Americans trying to buy a house? Would massive demand and 0 supply raise prices or lower them?
No, seatbelts. Some people get claustrophobic while wearing them, and it can be very traumatic, so some people are just going to have to go flying out the windshield to keep those people from feeling some discomfort.So ban cars?
No, seatbelts. Some people get claustrophobic while wearing them, and it can be very traumatic, so some people are just going to have to go flying out the windshield to keep those people from feeling some discomfort.
What have I said ITT that you find so offensive?Do you consider yourself "insensitive about matters of political violence and death" out of curiosity? Your absolute insanity itt has shown you and every other lefty to be way the fuck more reprehensible than anything Charlie Kirk ever said.
Sure but I'm going to point that out regardless. I never expect that someone like you can be convinced by anything I would say, it's for others reading the exchange to make up their minds.I don't care what you think I'm missing or what you want the "core point" to be.
Whole lotta reasons for that, bud. Your conduct throughout this whole thread is a good place to start.I never expect that someone like you can be convinced by anything I would say,
You guys keep crying about how apparently horrific my posts are but I don’t see how anything I said ITT is out of the ordinary for a WR thread. What do you think are some of the most egregious posts I've made ITT? And if I look through your post history will I find you defending dark humor when the shoe is on the other foot? For example, something like?Whole lotta reasons for that, bud. Your conduct throughout this whole thread is a good place to start.
There are lots of these Valentine's Day cards going around. Some people enjoy morbid humor. Like previously mentioned, there's an Aaron Hernandez card going around too. George Floyd is not some untouchable messiah.
Why was dark humor okay then but not now? Is Kirk some "untouchable messiah"?I agree, that these should not have been passed around at the station, if that's what happened. That humor isn't for everybody, but it's still just dark humor.