Social Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed

[HereticBD]

You can pretend to read my mind or you can deal with what I wrote there which I fully stand by, namely that political violence is wrong and what happened to Kirk should be condemned at the same time that I think he deserves to be made fun of.

Nobody needs to read your mind. When you constantly give qualifiers to not celebrating his death, only to go on and essentially say he deserved it because he "said some things", it's safe to say you think he deserved it.

You're not smart or clever enough to hide your true feelings on this matter. All you've done in this in this thread, is demonize him and his wife after the fact, and make excuses as to why people(like you) are celebrating his death...but you don't believe he should've been killed...

Just shut the fuck up. You're not fooling anyone.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Oh I am certain you are a saint my friend and are on the noble quest to prove your worth in the eyes of your god.

You are the exception to the rule and all of us can only hope to live up to your greatness as a human being.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Now it's "may"?


Here we go again. "If he did..."

That's my point. You don't treat it as an "if", so don't start saying it now. You talk about it being factually true despite no indisputable evidence. You think wanting something to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt is a "loophole", yet you gleefully throw around your opinion as fact. Saying anybody would justify child rape due to politics is just you projecting.

Its a fact he's doing everything in his power to suppress the release of the Epstein Files.
That alone makes him an accomplice to child sex crimes.

 

[nostradumbass]

So it's ok to mock someone getting their skull fractured, and then have your supporters cry when people make fun of you getting shot? Interesting morals. Doesn't really work here though since those school kids definitely did die.

Point still stands: You nerds can dish it out, but you just can't take it.

Lol at "point still stands" after it completely fell apart.

Feel free to post this nonexistent video of Charlie Kirk making fun of school kids getting murdered.

"Your supporters cry when people make fun of you getting shot and killed in front of your family for hurting out feelings" is just a chef's kiss example of the party of empathy proving yet again that your fake empathy and virtue signaling was only ever a flimsy attempt to cover for your lack of morals and decency, so thanks I suppose.

 

[Darkballs]

Feel free to post this nonexistent video of Charlie Kirk making fun of school kids getting murdered.

Sure, it was in the video you quoted, then misrepresented, where he said that kids getting their heads blown off was just something we had to live with.

It took you over a day to come up with that?

 

[Darkballs]

Nobody needs to read your mind. When you constantly give qualifiers to not celebrating his death, only to go on and essentially say he deserved it because he "said some things", it's safe to say you think he deserved it.

Accept he never said that, and you'll never quote him doing so.

This isn't hard to understand, but two things can be true: 1) Charlie Kirk didn't deserve to get shot; and 2) Charlie Kirk was a fake christian douchebag.

You whine about #1, but can't quote anyone here actually saying anything. You guys complain about #2, but no one cares.
Or to quote your lord and savior: Fuck your feelings.

 

[kflo]

I know, I'm just saying my point doesn't hinge on that detail and I don't think it should be relitigated here.

I’m not gonna just let every “genocide” reference go unchallenged just because it’s spammed in different threads.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Accept he never said that, and you'll never quote him doing so.

This isn't hard to understand, but two things can be true: 1) Charlie Kirk didn't deserve to get shot; and 2) Charlie Kirk was a fake christian douchebag.

You whine about #1, but can't quote anyone here actually saying anything. You guys complain about #2, but no one cares.
Or to quote your lord and savior: Fuck your feelings.

They have to act like Kirk's critics are worse than they actually are while Kirk was some morally pure martyr, otherwise canonizing him as a saint and his critics as evil doesn't work based off the actual facts.

 

[DoctorTaco]

1) Charlie Kirk didn't deserve to get shot;

I agree, you agree, but ol’ Chuck said that civilian bloodshed is the price of the 2nd amendment. According to him this was the cost of doing business.

 

[Seano]

I agree, you agree, but ol’ Charles said that civilian bloodshed is the price of the 2nd amendment. According to him this was the cost of doing business.

Well... It is. Not sure why you all have found that to be a controversial statement. There has always been and always will be people who exploit laws and rights to hurt others. Surely, you're aware of this. What rights are you willing to give away because someone exploited them for evil purposes? How about free speech because someone posted a meme you dislike?

For some reason, in your head that's a green light to find a sliver of joy in someone's death and use it to zing your political opposites.

The thing is, your reasoning isn't righteous, its petty and childish. And you know it too, thats the worst part. The only reason you guys can't let this thread die is because it amuses you to dunk on a guy who got murdered because other people you hate liked him. Over 20K posts in this thread, FFS.

 

[nostradumbass]

Sure, it was in the video you quoted, then misrepresented, where he said that kids getting their heads blown off was just something we had to live with.

It took you over a day to come up with that?

So like I said, it's purely your own desperate flailing to pretend that saying the existence of criminals does not justify removing constitutional rights from the law abiding is "making fun of dead kids".

And again, the only good that comes from lefties murdering and cheering and justifying murder is that the phony "party of empathy" horse shit goes up in smoke and exposes what you all really are.

 

[Darkballs]

So like I said, it's purely your own desperate flailing to pretend that saying the existence of criminals does not justify removing constitutional rights from the law abiding is "making fun of dead kids".

No I'd say the nonchalant way he pretends there is nothing to do about kids being shot is by definition making light of kids getting killed. Further more, I think he's a fake christian for saying so.

Now let that simmer for about a day until you respond again.

 

[DoctorTaco]

Well... It is. Not sure why you all have found that to be a controversial statement. There has always been and always will be people who exploit laws and rights to hurt others. Surely, you're aware of this. What rights are you willing to give away because someone exploited them for evil purposes?

I’d be willing to make it much harder to purchase a fire arm if it meant a demonstrable decline in innocent deaths.

How about free speech because someone posted a meme you dislike?

We already blew past that one:

LAWSUIT: Ex-cop sues after spending 37 days in jail for sharing meme following Charlie Kirk murder

Larry Bushart was arrested for a social media post and held on a $2 million bond he could not afford. Now, he's fighting back.

www.thefire.org

For some reason, in your head that's a green light to find a sliver of joy in someone's death and use it to zing your political opposites.

You’re not in my head and I haven’t done this.

The thing is, your reasoning isn't righteous, it’s petty and childish.

It is petty, I’ll give you that. The irony of a guy who says children getting shot in the face is the price we must pay himself getting blasted is pretty perfect and pointing it out is petty AF.

And you know it too, thats the worst part.

The worst part was probably the guy who got shot in the head for no good god damn reason, but that’s just me.

The only reason you guys can't let this thread die is because it amuses you to dunk on a guy who got murdered because other people you hate liked him. Over 20K posts in this thread, FFS.

20k +1 with your response. (See? Petty.)

 

[Seano]

I’d be willing to make it much harder to purchase a fire arm if it meant a demonstrable decline in innocent deaths.

We already blew past that one:

LAWSUIT: Ex-cop sues after spending 37 days in jail for sharing meme following Charlie Kirk murder

Larry Bushart was arrested for a social media post and held on a $2 million bond he could not afford. Now, he's fighting back.

www.thefire.org

You’re not in my head and I haven’t done this.

It is petty, I’ll give you that. The irony of a guy who says children getting shot in the face is the price we must pay himself getting blasted is pretty perfect and pointing it out is petty AF.

The worst part was probably the guy who got shot in the head for no good god damn reason, but that’s just me.

20k +1 with your response. (See? Petty.)

I don't have to be in your head. Thats what this forum is, a big community journal of whats in our heads.

 

[DoctorTaco]

I don't have to be in your head. Thats what this forum is, a big community journal of whats in our heads.

When you put it that way… I should probably call my shrink and get back on the schedule

 

[nostradumbass]

No I'd say the nonchalant way he pretends there is nothing to do about kids being shot is by definition making light of kids getting killed. Further more, I think he's a fake christian for saying so.

Now let that simmer for about a day until you respond again.

So yet again, not agreeing with your braindead solution of removing constitutional rights from law abiding citizens is "the definition of making light of kids getting shot".

Since it's the same point Charlie made that you think justifies his murder, surely you think cars should be banned to prevent kids from dying in crashes too, right, or do you not think so and are therefore "making light of kids being killed"?

 

[Darkballs]

So yet again, not agreeing with your braindead solution of removing constitutional rights from law abiding citizens is "the definition of making light of kids getting shot".

No, I think saying there is nothing to be done about children getting shot is the definition of making light of kids getting shot.

You can try and put more words in my mouth an ask that question a fourth time, but, spoiler alert, you'll get the same answer.

 

[nostradumbass]

No, I think saying there is nothing to be done about children getting shot is the definition of making light of kids getting shot.

You can try and put more words in my mouth an ask that question a fourth time, but, spoiler alert, you'll get the same answer.

Which is of course no answer, and you don’t think anything can be done about kids being killed in car crashes because the solution would inconvenience you, which you've now repeated is "definition of making light of kids getting killed".

 

[Darkballs]

Which is of course no answer, and you don’t think anything can be done about kids being killed in car crashes because the solution would inconvenience you, which you've now repeated is "definition of making light of kids getting killed".

Well if kids were dying in car crashes and there were things we could do to prevent it, only to have a fake christian plead there was no point, I'd call him a douche too.

 

[nostradumbass]

Well if kids were dying in car crashes and there were things we could do to prevent it, only to have a fake christian plead there was no point, I'd call him a douche too.

The fuck do you mean "if kids were dying in car crashes"? It's a matter of fact that car crash deaths are way the hell higher than "gun murders", so the solution is the same as the one that you think would solve "gun murders", just ban cars, but you don't want your solution to that problem because it would inconvenience you, so you are obviously fine with "kids dying" if the solution would inconvenience you, so you are the douche by your own standard.

Yes, proposing a gun ban for a country with 400 million of them already in circulation is just a stupid asshole suggestion.