lol im gpad someone caught the hypocrisy about tj. thought i was being clever but nobody seemed to notice.Art isn't bad, but it's a bad idea to get portraits of real people in black/gray, makes everyone look wrinklier instead of enhancing their good traits.
It can look good for famous portraits of fictional/historical people, but IMHO it's the worst way to get a loved one' tattoo.
Didn't this cracker own like 600 slaves? Otherwise, cool story bro.
The first pic's angle always reminds me of
I have a few tattoos of various styles, and I love them all - no ragrets, but portraits scare me; they're very expensive, and have the potential of coming out looking bad even with a really skilled tattoo artist.
But good for Charles if it makes him happy, as long as you the wearer, smile when you look at it, then it's a good tattoo IMO
Not that a slave owner is all he was but it was the most fqmous slave owner i could think of.

