- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 61,854
- Reaction score
- 131,010
LMAO Let me know how that works out for you.
Yes, a small group of protesters will convince a major network to keep losing money on a show that costs $100 million a year to produce.
LMAO Let me know how that works out for you.
Because he was popular and/or entertaining, like any other show TODAY that brings in similar numbers. Do you think all shows are suffering because of the internet or something? Is cable gonna disappear any day now? Is this what you're going with?
It's also just bad money management. Why the hell was Colbert being paid like some kind of superstar, as if he actually was Carson? Dude brought in late stage WCW ratings.
I've heard the whole merger conspiracy on other issues that actually have explanations. The Colbert Show was losing the company 10s of millions of dollars a year. How it lasted so long being a money sink is beyond me.
The show was losing $40 million a year. They canceled Corbin's show all the same a while back for the same reason. There is no conspiracy here. The show was a financial albatross. They were paying Colbert stupid amounts of money(and the production team), for negative returns.
I had a look into the $40M figure. Apparently it's traced to Matthew Belloni of Puck news, who is considered a neutral insider and reliable in this area. He also reports that there were opporuntities for Colbert to offset his losses with taking on ads from certain companies and product placements but he opted out.Or maybe because the show was losing $40 million a year… with Colbert making $16 million per year…
It's the same basic shit as it was during Carson's time, as far as cable goes. If that doesn't work for you, how about Leno? How was he running circles around Colbert's numbers? Leno at his absolute worst, was bringing in a complete point higher than Colbert's average.The internet definitely doesn’t help , but really there were just less channels, people only tuned into a few stations.
It’s almost like there was a huge difference in Carson’s time.
It might be on some level. When your show is in the dumps, you might not want to irritate the people who are paying you to fail. You say that kind of shit about the network when you're untouchable. Not when you're a liability who costs them tens of millions per year. I mean, duh.Given the timing and how Colbert called the CBS settlement a bribe on his show, I think it's all related.
I had a look into the $40M figure. Apparently it's traced to Matthew Belloni of Puck news, who is considered a neutral insider and reliable in this area. He also reports that there were opporuntities for Colbert to offset his losses with taking on ads from certain companies and product placements but he opted out.
Belloni also had talks with insiders that give weight that all these things can be true - that it's a money loser, the new ownership (Ellison family) is pro trump, the anticipated new president is conservative and wants to work with Bari Weiss to change the direction of the network, Trump wanted it done, and there were concerns about the merger.
Given the timing and how Colbert called the CBS settlement a bribe on his show, I think it's all related. That things reached a tipping point behind the scenes and this story about the money was more a way to save face for all involved. That it was just objective economics - a non-story.
If I had an employee not earning his wage, calling me out, undercutting my efforts to save costs, I'd probably get rid of him too, tbh. I am curious if he was approached about a paycut and if he more or less soft-quit with the remarks to create this controversy.
Yes… the mainstream media hadn’t driven off their viewers by lying to them and being woke… lol
Maybe insulting half the country isn’t a great long term business strategy
The same for the far left media that continues to fire talentless, overpriced morons as their viewers flee
They can’t die too soon
Meanwhile Gutfield continues to add viewers.
With a fraction of Colbert’s budget
It literally is the same, the amount of stations on programs on now compared to Carson’s era is so vastly different to compare without the mention of it is different is an exercise in dishonesty.It's the same basic shit as it was during Carson's time, as far as cable goes. If that doesn't work for you, how about Leno? How was he running circles around Colbert's numbers? Leno at his absolute worst, was bringing in a complete point higher than Colbert's average.
You can deflect all you want, but the bottom line is that the guy sucked, and it was a show so politically charged that it locked out half the country from even glancing at it. The dude had like 400% more politicians on his show during his tenure, than Carson or damn near anybody. Yeah, people love listening to politicians on what is supposed to be a non-political show.
It was unfunny, but definitely not because he was pushing cringe worthy Liberal propaganda every single night without missing a beat, for years? It was the main reason it was unfunny, much like all woke shows that unsurprisingly meet the axe.It has nothing to do with being woke. It just wasn’t funny. So that probably had something to do with it.
It doesn't matter what I personally find funny. A late night host's job is to appeal to all, regardless of what I think of their show. Colbert was not only not doing that, but held and presented a personal disdain for half the country.I’m not deflecting just merely pointing out how your comparison of viewership numbers vs Carson , was really fucking dumb. And then you slobbering how funny he was , when you weren’t even alive during most of his stint.
What is woke?It was unfunny, but definitely not because he was pushing cringe worthy Liberal propaganda every single night without missing a beat, for years? It was the main reason it was unfunny, much like all woke shows that unsurprisingly meet the axe.
You're just in denial. Colbert is not incapable of being a funny host that can get anyone chuckling. He sold out to be a government stooge, and the side he shilled for ain't exactly popular these days.
It doesn't matter what I personally find funny. A late night host's job is to appeal to all, regardless of what I think of their show. Colbert was not only not doing that, but held and presented a personal disdain for half the country.
When you have a cry session for "your" audience after an election, you've lost the plot.
Although, I must say, I find your comments about how I couldn't possible know about Johnny Carson because I was too young to really get into the vibe at the time, hilarious. Like, do you think I can't possibly have seen the man in action today, and judge accordingly? Are all his shows in the same vault as the Epstein files or something?
Don't play dumb. You know exactly what it is. You just don't like the negative moniker, because you support most of what is considered "woke". It's radical leftism at it's core, being presented as the path forward for humanity.What is woke?
That his brand of "humor"(propaganda), was not a big reason as to why he failed and got cancelled.Late night with Colbert was not funny. What am I denying?
Again, don't play dumb. Dude literally said that if you watched his show, you were probably not feeling good about the election results. That, combined with the show being literally nothing but Liberal propaganda, tells you what he thinks of the side he's not trying to appeal to.You’re in Colberts head you know how he feels about half the country?
I don't need to have grown up with up with it to watch it and judge it through a modern lens. Shit was funny, and most importantly, welcoming to ALL.Can you see some of his stuff yeah, but you’re going on like it was some great you grew up watching.
I think you're projecting here. Carson has timeless bits and a personality that remains endearing to this day. There's a reason he was a juggernaut, and it's not because of the times.But even if you watch it now it’s a late night talk show, I mean yeah a lot of it is topical for the time so you’re probably not gonna relate as much.
I didn’t read any of you hysterical retweeting , try having a discussion without relying on Twitter to do your thinking for you.
These people are terminally ill lol
Who the fuck has cable nowadays? It's a dying breed. Hence why nobody wants to buy Dish."The #1 Late Night Show"
Colbert: 2.4 million average
Gutfeld: 3.0 million average
These people are terminally ill lol