Cannibalism, mutually agreed

His thesis is probably that the mentally ill are possessed by demons. So he's not saying they aren't mentally ill, he just believes the cause of their mental illness is demonic.
I think it can be separate. Mental illness or demonic. Or both combined. That's another thread topic though.

If what people are saying is true, that cannibalism is popular around Germany, home to the Nazi's, it is interesting. I know you are an atheist, but the Nazi's were heavily into the occult.

And no doubt what these two men were apart of, was an evil act that you just can't understand. But I believe mental illness and demonic influence was involved here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why don't you think about the difference and then ask yourself if I'll find either one less ridiculous.

The difference is massive, as you created a false dichotomy and I illustrated why it does not have to exist, and likely doesn't to rip.
 
The difference is massive, as you created a false dichotomy and I illustrated why it does not have to exist, and likely doesn't to rip.

I didn't create a false dichotomy. Being possessed by demons is no less grounded in insanity than claiming something has demonic influence. One is a demon coming into your mind and taking over, while the other is caused by demons.

They are both retarded superstitious ideas that hold zero value in psychopathology.

I think it can be separate. Mental illness or demonic. Or both combined. That's another thread topic though.

If what people are saying is true, that cannibalism is popular around Germany, home to the Nazi's, it is interesting. I know you are an atheist, but the Nazi's were heavily into the occult.

And no doubt what these two men were apart of, was an evil act that you just can't understand. But I believe mental illness and demonic influence was involved here.

Cannibalism isn't more popular in Germany than anywhere else. Literally 20 seconds on Google would give you an answer.
 
Germans have become such liberal cucks that they actually want other to people to murder and eat them. Christ almighty...

But seriously, deja vu, huh? Again?


Who would not want to be eaten?
 
I didn't create a false dichotomy. .

You did. You implied that since rip believed he was possessed by demons, that he was discounting the idea that the man could be mentally ill. That's a false dichotomy, since one can be mentally ill due to the demons. It's not either/or.

Whether or not it's true is another issue entirely.

Who would not want to be eaten?

You have a good point. Would prefer to be regurgitated immediately though. Repeatedly.
 
You did. You implied that since rip believed he was possessed by demons, that he was discounting the idea that the man could be mentally ill. That's a false dichotomy, since one can be mentally ill due to the demons. It's not either/or.

Whether or not it's true is another issue entirely.

If demons caused mental illness, then you would be completely changing how mental illness works according to the laws (known and unknown) of science. Demons don't cause shit. Demons don't possess people. I get what you're trying you say, but I don't quite believe this fits a false dichotomy.
 
If demons caused mental illness, then you would be completely changing how mental illness works according to the laws (known and unknown) of science. Demons don't cause shit. Demons don't possess people. I get what you're trying you say, but I don't quite believe this fits a false dichotomy.
Science can't prove that demon's don't exist. But when you encounter a demon possessed person they get extremely agitated when you start talking about Jesus. But it's not really the person getting agitated, it's the demon. That's why you hear a man's voice come out of a woman sometimes when she is possessed.

In the last year a demon possessed kid went to the ER and walked up the wall backwards and onto the ceiling. The hospital workers witnessed it. It was Gary Indiana and we posted that article.

When there, and in the grips of demonic possession, his grandmother maintained, her youngest grandson – growling and gurning – walked backwards towards a wall then glided up it, walking backwards to above her head height, holding her hands all the way as she tried to coax him down and ‘it’ out, before flipping over her head and landing on the floor.

The child had no recollection of the event that was witnessed by nurses, social workers and paramedics all of whom recorded it in official reports.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ial-reports-saying-no-hoax.html#ixzz455d5NBCk
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Guy wants to die , two consenting adults , as sick as it is i don't know , not sure this should be prosecuted
The cannibal should be executed, plain and simple, in the main square of his town.
 
Last edited:
No one hasn't linked the Rammstein song about other cannibalism case before this? Shame.
 
The cannibal should be executed, plain and simple, in the main square of his town.
Thats as barbaric as what he did , more actually
 
Thats as barbaric as what he did , more actually

Only if you take the position that he isn't guilty of a crime. If he is, then the state executing him, publicly or not, is not as barbaric. The state has the legitimate monopoly on violence.
 
Thats as barbaric as what he did , more actually
It would be very sane and very useful
first as a punishment for a depravate murder
second for preventing the cannibalistic ritual to became fashion .
 
It would be very sane and very useful
first as a punishment for a depravate murder
second for preventing the cannibalistic ritual to became fashion .
ISIS would approve of your suggestion, not many outside of them .
 
I don't have an issue with suicide, I do have one with assisted suicide. That said, if they can't prove that he didn't kill himself, I can't look at it from a murder lens. I can't even look at it as assisted suicide. Maybe the guy committed suicide himself and the cop took over once the deed was done. So, suicide for me unless it can be proven otherwise.

Actually a good point. Usually when you have a dismembered body you will assume it's murder and subsequent dismembering; however, with this backstory, one could assume otherwise.

Important piece of info: he confessed to police early on to cutting the other guy's throat; he later retracted that and said it only happened post-mortem.

That's definitely important to me. If it's post-mortem then I stand by my earlier opinion. If it was pre-mortem (is that even a term?) then it's manslaughter.

None of this seems like a relevant line of reasoning when you have (hopefully) crimes on the books regarding mutilation or desecration of a body. I know they exist here.

So I mean sure, maybe not a charge of murder or manslaughter, but there's gotta be a crime on the books to charge this guy with. What he did is unconscionable to 99% of other people in society. The other 1% just don't have consciences.

Cop should be locked up for a long time. I have no trouble with the assisted suicide, its the mutilation of the body that I have trouble with. Its like the Ed Gein case where the guy didn't exactly kill the people or proven that he killed them but did dig up bodies at the cementary to act out his fetish

Exactly this. We have decided in western culture that messing with a persons corpse is just not cool.
 
ISIS would approve of your suggestion, not many outside of them .
oooooooooooooh I feel guilty being so primitive ..since I would like to protect the society from this sickness
Isis would hire the cannibal,they are all pervert beasts after all, while the suicidal :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek: would a perfect immigration supporter in the west...
 
Back
Top