what the fuck are you talking about? you being incapable of basic reading comprehension isn't exactly my problem here.
no i don't have an opinion on the specific amount of clen you can or cannot take. i don't give two fucks about the dosage people use. i'm disputing your argument that a low level of clen in blood means unintentional use. the fact that the amount halves in 36 hours doesn't prove your point, lol. if you don't understand this simple fact, then you really shouldn't be debating this topic.
let's use your own example: you have 20ng / ml on monday, and 36 hours later you have 10 ng / ml. that's great!
but what happens if you actually took a shitton more (say, on the previous tuesday), and we tested you 36 hours
prior, you'd have 40 ng / ml, right? if we did it 72 hours earlier, you'd have 80 ng / ml. 108 hours earlier, your level would've been 160 ng / ml. 108 hours isn't even 5 days. 2^x rises really fucking fast.
the fact that clenbuterol has a 36 hour halflife would've been very beneficial to your argument had canelo passed the first test. i even dare to claim it would've cleared him! unfortunately for you, he didn't. he failed the first fucking time they tested him, so it's a stupid point to bring up.
do explain the inconsistencies then.
it's inconsistent that i don't place the same weight on roided grapplers that i do on boxers and mma fighters?
@Marc A pulled my "support" of palhares straight out of his ass, as i've bashed the dirty shit a million times over.
if you guys said "canelo fucked up but i'm still a fan and he's now enrolled into VADA so all is well as far as i'm concerned", i would have nothing to add. i was a big fan, and i'm disappointed that he fucked up. he's the face of boxing, he should've fucking known better. but this mental gymnastics with excuses and trying to discredit my points by digging through my ten thousand posts on this site is beyond pathetic.
argue the point, or fuck off.