- Joined
- Oct 8, 2013
- Messages
- 1,674
- Reaction score
- 726
What flaws about PPC would you change?Because he sucks and isn't far right in au of the shit that matters.
I don't mean the social stuff. I mean a proper reform party.
What flaws about PPC would you change?Because he sucks and isn't far right in au of the shit that matters.
I don't mean the social stuff. I mean a proper reform party.
What flaws about PPC would you change?
First off, I wouldn't have yet another Frenchman running it.
But just look at their official platform. I'm the first vice things are all social shit.
Pipeline's are like number 6 on their platform.
Their priorities are all out of whack.
Recently polling has shown that Canadians are considerably more favorable to the idea of joining the EU than they are joining into a similar agreement with the US.I'm not a big fan either. 'Cut corporate tax rates' is not interesting to me.
'Scrap the income tax?' Now you have my attention.
End crown corporations, open up crown lands to development, and if Canadians are really too dumb to realize the benefits of simply joining the US, then let's at least join an EU type agreement with them. Free trade and free movement between the two member states.
No, it shows that I am taking the situation seriously. I don't think the sovereignty of Canada is something to play games about.
Poilievre is a Trump ally who refuses to get his security clearance for some unknown reason.
The fact that he even has a chance to be the next PM is a damning indictment of conservative voters in Canada. They would sell out their own country to own the libs.
You know Tom Mulcair the leader of your precious NDP party did the exact same thing, and has said multiple times this is a non issue and a weak attack from the Liberals/NDPImagine believing Pierre Poilievre
Crazy how Canadians are waking up, by supporting the Liberals for stealing the conservatives policies. That's not waking up, that's being asleep at the wheel, not bothering to read past a headline.![]()
338Canada Canada | Poll Analysis & Electoral Projections
338canada.com
Current projections have it as a 55% chance of a Liberal victory and rising.
Fortunately it seems that Trump's reckless and disrespectful behaviour has woken up Canadian voters.
Pierre Poilievre is not the man for this moment in history. And he will be remembered as a footnote.
If that is true then that would make you a hypocrite for being a life long NDP support considering they did the same thing.I am aware of Poilievre's excuse. It's not credible, because he is not credible.
Those things are only bad when a conservative does them. If it's a liberal policy its a good thing, even when they are stolen from a conservative and we called them a bad policy.So you distrust PP because of this, but you trust a government that:
- expelled Chinese lab scientists with zero explanation and then when smoke was present said "nothing to see here, except these heavily redacted documents we can't reveal in the name of national security"
- kept foreign interference a secret from the PC Mp's who were targeted, and then when the smoke really started appointed an ally to investigate who has since completely tarnished his legacy by towing the party line.
- accused Admiral Norman of violating procurement procedures, but when the smoke started, dropped the charges and then paid for his silence
- handed contacts to good old friends the WE charity
- brought a literal Nazi onto the parliament floor without vetting lol
- awarded arrived and app at astronomical cost with zero results. Have awarded numerous contracts to same greasy contractors.
That is worthy of trust and your vote, but Pierre bad, very bad.
Excuse my interjection. It looks to me like Pollievre doesn't get his security clearance because it would be on condition that he sign a nondisclosure agreement, which would prevent him from asking the questions that he can otherwise freely ask, otherwise known as being an effective leader of the opposition.Funny how his supporters aren’t saying shit about it.
Would you give a specific example?Their economic policy is basically left wing.
Yes. Some group named diagolon. The leader of that group. He denounced what the guy said, but some time later was seen chumming around the ilk and supporters.Are you talking about Pierre? Who were the guys?
That is what he says, but intelligence leaders of the past have said that it’s not a valid reason and he should get the clearance.Excuse my interjection. It looks to me like Pollievre doesn't get his security clearance because it would be on condition that he sign a nondisclosure agreement, which would prevent him from asking the questions that he can otherwise freely ask, otherwise known as being an effective leader of the opposition.
Does the Hunter laptop story have all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation? That's what 51 intelligence officials wrote. And yet, here you are trotting out the same tired argument that we should let intelligence leaders, even unnamed intelligence leaders, do our thinking for us. Does the security clearance have a nondisclosure precondition?That is what he says, but intelligence leaders of the past have said that it’s not a valid reason and he should get the clearance.
I just looked into it. Looks like Pierre and the Diagolon guy shook hands at a conservative event in 2022. Then last year the guy got drunk on a stream and said he wanted to bang Pierre's wife. Then Pierre denounced them and told RCMP to investigate the guy.Yes. Some group named diagolon. The leader of that group. He denounced what the guy said, but some time later was seen chumming around the ilk and supporters.
Looks perfect for me. We are fighting for the soul of our people. When the Soviet Union collapsed they were 3rd world levels of poor, but Moscow was still Russian, Vilnius still Lithuanian, etc. Also there's a ton of overlap of course as the housing issue is linked to immigration.First off, I wouldn't have yet another Frenchman running it.
But just look at their official platform. I'm the first vice things are all social shit.
Pipeline's are like number 6 on their platform.
Their priorities are all out of whack.
After that, he was asked if he supports them, and instead of saying they are vile shitheads, he said he has never heard of them before. Seems like a cop out to not piss them off further.I just looked into it. Looks like Pierre and the Diagolon guy shook hands at a conservative event in 2022. Then last year the guy got drunk on a stream and said he wanted to bang Pierre's wife. Then Pierre denounced them and told RCMP to investigate the guy.
As much as I wish Pierre was a crypto far right guy the only thing about him that seems to be right wing is that he is anti-tranny. Otherwise just a Bidenesque soulless centrist.
Are you talking about Pierre? Who were the guys?
Then why has no leader of the opposition ever refused before?Excuse my interjection. It looks to me like Pollievre doesn't get his security clearance because it would be on condition that he sign a nondisclosure agreement, which would prevent him from asking the questions that he can otherwise freely ask, otherwise known as being an effective leader of the opposition.
Apply that line of thinking to the carbon tax.Then why has no leader of the opposition ever refused before?
Uh, whut?Apply that line of thinking to the carbon tax.
*Rape his wife. Be accurate.I just looked into it. Looks like Pierre and the Diagolon guy shook hands at a conservative event in 2022. Then last year the guy got drunk on a stream and said he wanted to bang Pierre's wife.
Except that he was seen meeting with them at a rally in 2024.Then Pierre denounced them and told RCMP to investigate the guy.
Lol. Ok.As much as I wish Pierre was a crypto far right guy the only thing about him that seems to be right wing is that he is anti-tranny. Otherwise just a Bidenesque soulless centrist.
The line of thinking you are promoting is: Every politician should do exactly what his predecessors did.Uh, whut?
That is not at all my line of thinking.The line of thinking you are promoting is: Every politician should do exactly what his predecessors did.
No, he should get security clearance because it is sketchy as fuck that he is refusing.Pierre Pollievre should get security clearance because his predecessors did.
What a bizarre non sequiturTrudeau and Singh shouldn't have instituted a carbon tax because their predecessors didn't.