You've convinced me! As soon as I saw the Vid for "The Turkish Samuri" I was astounded, specialy when I saw his record of 6 losses and 3 wins. He's defos the level of a Khem or a Sayok. Did you see the result of the Masato knock down? Masato beat him.
Also putting up vids of HL real KO's and not videos of high level guys throwing 4 or 5 spinning techniques every round pretty sure I didn't see that. What you'll do now though is find an old vid of Andy Hug or TKD guy making it work against some one once then say everyone should be hammering spinning strikes all the time.
Axe kicks too, 5 or 6 every round, quick to Youtube "axe kick highlight real"
So wait... those weren't high level guys? Have you actually seen Serkan's fight with Masato. It was very close. A lot of people actually thought that Serkan should have won on account of his knockdowns and aggressive performance. Serkan's problem was always that he came out too wildly and aggressively, not that his spinning kicks didn't work. I thought we were arguing about the effectiveness of spinning attacks. Several of them landed solidly on
Masato, one of the best kickboxers of our time, and one of them blasted him off his feet and into the turnbuckle. So what if Masato took the decision? Doesn't that show that the
techniques were effective? Doesn't it say something about how effective they are that Masato got smashed by several of them, especially against a young fighter with a 6-3 record?
I can show you more videos if you want. Evidently you're afraid to be proven wrong, or you'd already be searching them out yourself. The reason I posted highlight videos is because they condensed a lot of effective spinning attacks into a short timeframe, and you don't strike me as the type of guy who would watch an entire fight, especially if I told you beforehand that the video would prove your misconceived notions wrong. But hey, what the hell. Behold the glory of Steve Vick.
See, I'm imagining the scenario in your gym. You strut proudly up to the heavy bag, having just seen Edson Barboza knock out Terry Etim with a spinning hook kick. "I can do that," you say to yourself, and proceed to sluggishly spin around and fling your leg at the bag. You hyperextend your knee, hurt your heel, and fall down. Standing back up, you dust yourself off and proudly proclaim to all who will listen: "Spinning attacks are useless!" Sound about right?
So I'm saying spinning strikes should be used spairingly in a fight, once or twice, maybe three times at a push. What are you saying, throw them out there all day long? I'd love to hear the ideas from your MT instructor, definatly after that video you recomended. Top tip, just because the guy looks Thai doesn't mean he knows what he's talking about, I thought him waving that big pink double ender would be a giveaway for you.
I get what you're saying. It's just that you're wrong. I'm saying you ought to throw them whenever they're called for. I suspect that you don't throw spinning attacks very well, and so no, you probably shouldn't use them more than once a round. That surprise factor may be the only thing that makes them work for you. But there are styles and fighters that use spinning attacks of all varieties very well, and when the situation calls they can be used, no matter how many times a round. A spin isn't as easy for the eyes to detect as you might think.
You think I picked the video because the trainer is Thai? I picked it because the Superman in the video is done well. The kick is effectively faked, and the lunge with the punch is well-executed. Did I recommend any of the training techniques in the video? No. I used it as an example of a well-executed superman punch.