I don't think so.
Why would he?
Why put his body through the cut to get there, all to fight someone he's already demolished in a division that said person called "dead"?
Then why are there so many threads saying that Conor and Nate are the same weight class?
Then why are there so many threads saying that Conor and Nate are the same weight class?
-
Probably because Conor is one of the biggest weight cutters in the UFC. Maybe Nate could make it too if he wanted to look like he stepped out of Auschwitz.
Lots of guys cut more than 20 lbs.
Then why are there so many threads saying that Conor and Nate are the same weight class?
In bodybuilding that's sometimes called the 'look of death'. It's what you see when a bodybuilder gets down to like 3-4% bodyfat and dehydrates them self so you can see all the striations The worst I can remember was James Irvin @185, but Conor @145 is right up there.Nah. He's naturally too big. He'd look worse than Florian cutting to 145. And Florian looked like he was going to die.
He's very lean at the 155 weigh ins. The only way for him to make 145 would be for him to sacrifice some muscle, which would hurt his performance. Not worth it IMO, especially at this stage of his career.
Because Conor is a very big 145'er and would be similar-sized to most of the LW division, and Nate is a lightweight. Not complicated.
He could be leaner. Weigh-in Diaz is maybe at 7-8% bodyfat and he could drop to 4-5%. He could also lose muscle if he had to. You can always lose muscle. Just ask Christian Bale. In that photo people always post from 'The Machinist', bale is around 120-130 lbs. at the same height as Nate Diaz, 6'.Sacrifice what muscles? The guy is already as lean as he could be for his height.
Nah. Conor going into that fight looked no more than 5-7 lb apart from Nate, but the difference is Nate has a horrible body type to cut weight. He's skinny/lanky, so compared to a guy like Sherk his muscles/body don't retain as much water. I'd still think Cerrone cuts more weight to get to LW than Nate does.