Law Cain Velazquez arrested for shooting.

Thing is if he just killed this dude he gets temporary insanity and a slap on the wrist. And tbe sympathy of every parent understanding.
 
I didn't realize the guy had already been arrested and released. Was it the same judge that is throwing the key away on Cain? WTF
I don't think it's the same judge but yeah the molester was granted bail and released as soon as he was arrested. He's accused of not only molesting Cain's son a hundred times, he's also accused of molesting other kids at the daycare. There are people accused of murder and arrested in Santa Clara County that are out on bail right away. There were 3 recently that fled to Mexico while out on bail. Yet this Judge refuses to grant bail to Cain. His next hearing isn't until April 12th.

https://www.ktvu.com/news/suspect-from-early-2021-homicide-fled-to-mexico-san-jose-police-say
 
I don't think it's the same judge but yeah the molester was granted bail and released as soon as he was arrested. He's accused of not only molesting Cain's son a hundred times, he's also accused of molesting other kids at the daycare. There are people accused of murder and arrested in Santa Clara County that are out on bail right away. There were 3 recently that fled to Mexico while out on bail. Yet this Judge refuses to grant bail to Cain. His next hearing isn't until April 12th.

https://www.ktvu.com/news/suspect-from-early-2021-homicide-fled-to-mexico-san-jose-police-say
I knew he was granted bail but I thought the arrest happened after Cain tried to shoot him. I didn't realize Cain had done what the law required by going to them first and then the system failed him. Fuck that let him out.
 
I bet SHELYNA is woke trash



Confirmed.

R.3ed75f1775354a1199ca99a8cda31ee0
 
I didn't realize the guy had already been arrested and released. Was it the same judge that is throwing the key away on Cain? WTF

I doubt it, but it'd be amazing if it was true.

A black judge giving a white :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile a small bail, and gives a latino male no bail at all?

If she's the trail judge for Cain this is completely fucked.
 
so .. how's the innocent guy he shot doing ?
Yeah that's the real story here, I think the vast majority can understand and sympathize with Cain's anger and willingness to do harm to that scumbag. The problem is he went on a rampage and put a lot of innocent people's lives in jeopardy. An 11 mile high speed chase, discharging a firearm at and around other innocent people. Those are the reasons he's up shit creek right now.

Would a person be saying 'Free Cain' if his high speed chase caused a fatal car crash for someone they know? Would they be saying 'Free Cain' if one of the bullets he was recklessly firing struck their child in the head killing them? I personally understand Cain's rage and I have no problem with him killing a scumbag that violated his child but you can't justify putting innocents in harm's way to get the job done. Given the circumstances, had Cain gotten to this guy and killed him without putting anyone else in the line of fire then I'd be first in line shouting 'Free Cain'. However, that's not how it went down and Cain should spend some years behind bars for his casual disregard for the safety of other innocent people.
 
Yeah that's the real story here, I think the vast majority can understand and sympathize with Cain's anger and willingness to do harm to that scumbag. The problem is he went on a rampage and put a lot of innocent people's lives in jeopardy. An 11 mile high speed chase, discharging a firearm at and around other innocent people. Those are the reasons he's up shit creek right now.

Would a person be saying 'Free Cain' if his high speed chase caused a fatal car crash for someone they know? Would they be saying 'Free Cain' if one of the bullets he was recklessly firing struck their child in the head killing them? I personally understand Cain's rage and I have no problem with him killing a scumbag that violated his child but you can't justify putting innocents in harm's way to get the job done. Given the circumstances, had Cain gotten to this guy and killed him without putting anyone else in the line of fire then I'd be first in line shouting 'Free Cain'. However, that's not how it went down and Cain should spend some years behind bars for his casual disregard for the safety of other innocent people.


^^ all of this .. correct
 
Yeah that's the real story here, I think the vast majority can understand and sympathize with Cain's anger and willingness to do harm to that scumbag. The problem is he went on a rampage and put a lot of innocent people's lives in jeopardy. An 11 mile high speed chase, discharging a firearm at and around other innocent people. Those are the reasons he's up shit creek right now.

Would a person be saying 'Free Cain' if his high speed chase caused a fatal car crash for someone they know? Would they be saying 'Free Cain' if one of the bullets he was recklessly firing struck their child in the head killing them? I personally understand Cain's rage and I have no problem with him killing a scumbag that violated his child but you can't justify putting innocents in harm's way to get the job done. Given the circumstances, had Cain gotten to this guy and killed him without putting anyone else in the line of fire then I'd be first in line shouting 'Free Cain'. However, that's not how it went down and Cain should spend some years behind bars for his casual disregard for the safety of other innocent people.

We all could make up hypotheticals making it personal, and that's lead into the argument that no one should be given bail ever.

'What if it was your _______ that was _______?'

The simple fact is that far worse career criminals have been given bail for doing far worse crimes than Cain, who has no serious criminal record.
 
We all could make up hypotheticals making it personal, and that's lead into the argument that no one should be given bail ever.

'What if it was your _______ that was _______?'

The simple fact is that far worse career criminals have been given bail for doing far worse crimes than Cain, who has no serious criminal record.
I didn't comment on whether or not he should be granted bail. Judging by his record and the opinions of others in the mma community that know him, I wouldn't particularly be bothered if he was released on bail. But given the nature and recklessness of his crime I can understand how a judge may have a different opinion.
 
We all could make up hypotheticals making it personal, and that's lead into the argument that no one should be given bail ever.

'What if it was your _______ that was _______?'

The simple fact is that far worse career criminals have been given bail for doing far worse crimes than Cain, who has no serious criminal record.

tricky .. normally I'd say give him bail, he's not a threat to anyone .. but in this case he is actually .. to the molester .. I'm all for the guy getting his dues but from the judge's perspective it makes more sense to keep him where he is given the circumstances .. should the judge let him out knowing that he potentially/might/probably will go after the guy again ?
 
I think Cain should get bail because I think most of the accused should get bail but let’s not pretend that he didn’t act with incredible recklessness and put the safety of the public at risk.

I feel for Cain though. I hope he can get out of this jam and just have to run a check to the dude he shot


If her appearance wasn't enough to confirm she's 'woke' this certainly is.

"Santa Clara Law is proud to present the Social Justice and Human Rights Award for 2019 to Honorable Shelyna V. Brown JD ’96."

https://law.scu.edu/event/15th-annual-diversity-gala/
How does her appearance and this award signal that she is ‘woke’ trash? What does ‘woke’ even mean to you?
 
I didn't comment on whether or not he should be granted bail. Judging by his record and the opinions of others in the mma community that know him, I wouldn't particularly be bothered if he was released on bail. But given the nature and recklessness of his crime I can understand how a judge may have a different opinion.

As I said, I've seen far worse career criminals get bail for worse crimes than Cain's, and Cain has no serious criminal record.
 
tricky .. normally I'd say give him bail, he's not a threat to anyone .. but in this case he is actually .. to the molester .. I'm all for the guy getting his dues but from the judge's perspective it makes more sense to keep him where he is given the circumstances .. should the judge let him out knowing that he potentially/might/probably will go after the guy again ?

There's a much better argument the :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile is a greater danger to the public... or rather children... and he was given bail.

And instead of being in jail for two months, at least, until his next court hearing, the judge could have given him home arrest-bail and force him to wear an ankle monitor.

That would have been a reasonable compromise.
 
Back
Top