who cares how he spelled it. The important part was that pac lost.
Since when is Tim Bradley "fast as shit"? Last I heard his relative lack of speed compared to other...um...explosive fighters was one of the criticisms he faced.
When you're in with a guy 3 times as fast as you, it makes you slower than you actually are. Kinda common knowledge. Tim is pretty fast compared to most though.
Pffff yeah right. Broner is all that. He may be a clown but he is the real deal. Bradley is an averagely talented try-hard. He wouldn't be able to hang
See his fight with Ponce De Leon..
Bradley would be the first guy he has faced that can match his speed.. the first guy with real defensive awareness..and if that wasn't enough, he uses his head as an extra weapon in the ring.. I have no doubt that if Bradley and Broner fought tomorrow, Broner would lose clearly.
That's not to say that Broner wont eventually be superior, but right now he is not there..not even close imo
Since when is Tim Bradley "fast as shit"? Last I heard his relative lack of speed compared to other...um...explosive fighters was one of the criticisms he faced.
Timothy Bradley ain't no Eloy Perez. And he ain't Vicente Escobedo. And he ain't Antonio DeMarco. Broner would have a fight on his hands. Really anybody fighting Bradley has a fight on their hands.
I agree with your overall opinion, but disagree with anyone cherry picking that Ponce De Leon fight. Broner sat back and fought a passive fight for whatever reason. If he'd turned aggressive on Ponce De Leon, it would have been another easy fight like the ones with DeMarco and Escobedo. Nothing about that fight indicated to me that Ponce De Leon was actually the better boxer. Broner just fought with a strange, ineffective game plan.
the consensus thought on why Broner was passive is because he didn't like what was coming in return. Few who fight DPDL do, the guy can fight.
could've been an off night or there could be something to the DPDL fight.