• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Brandin Cooks = Desean Jackson

Fedorgasm

Steel Belt
@Steel
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
33,980
Reaction score
51,523
Everyone's going crazy over Brandin Cooks since the Pats got him, and that's gone into overdrive since Edelman got hurt. But there's a lot of issues with him that nobody seems to be talking about.

1. First off, stop saying he's going to be like Randy Moss. Moss was tall, could jump high, and had great hands. Cooks has none of those things. Cooks will not be catching jump balls.

2. Cooks is not a red zone threat. In the red zone Brady looks for Gronk, and if he can't find Gronk, then he goes with who has the reliable hands... Edelman, Amendola, etc.

3. "But he's playing in a high powered offense with Brady now!" Newsflash, he played in a high powered offense with a great QB on the Saints too. So this doesn't automatically mean he's going to be a lot better.

4. "But Belichick's a genius and he'll figure out how to use Cooks' talent!" Sean Payton is also an offensive genius, so it's possible that Payton already figured out how to use Cooks' talent, and was using it to it's max already.

5. "But Edelman's hurt!!! Cooks will get all of his targets!!!" Not necessarily. First of all, Cooks, who was supposedly the star WR on the Saints, was actually outperformed by rookie Michael Thomas, and lost a lot of targets to the undrafted Willie Snead. Brees would rather throw to those guys than give Cooks more targets. And there was no Gronk to compete with on the Saints.


I basically see Cooks' strengths as speed and precise route running. In that vein he's like Desean Jackson. His speed will stretch the field and open things up for OTHER receivers, but it doesn't necessarily make HIM catch more balls. Now, that's not a bad thing. Desean Jackson is a good receiver. But people need to stop acting like Cooks is going to be this year's AJ Green or Julio Jones.

My prediction is that Cooks has a season a little better than he had last year, and mostly because it's his 3rd year in the NFL and part of his natural progression.

Come at me bros.
 
Brees is a better QB than Brady but Brees targets coverage more than a man which is why Cooks could go quite for long stretches. Brady will target him more
 
Gronk is still the # 1 guy there and they will spread the ball around to much for Cooks to be drafted where he has been going.
 
Hes literally nothing like Djax.
 
Brees is a better QB than Brady...

giphy.gif
 
Give me Breesus over Brady as well.

Same team, same coach, no fucking chance Brady is better.
 
I agree with Brees over Brady.

Pats can still win a lot of games if Brady went down.

The saints would easily be the worst team in the league if they lost Brees. It would be like that year when the colts lost peyton and turned into a complete shit show.
 
Drew Brees has the best completion percentage in history, 66.6%, the number of the beast.

It's proof that he sold his soul to Satan in order to become a better QB than Brady.

Of course, Satan tricked him, by putting Brady on a legendary team, giving him Superbowl rings, a supermodel wife, and by making everyone act like Brady's the best despite what the data shows.

Brees was put on a shitty team where he is underappreciated and cursed with a hideous birthmark on his face.
 
Oh and Brady ranks 14th in all time completion percentage. Right behind Mr. Pick 6, Matt Schaub.

So you can argue about who has the weaker arm but the accuracy piece is settled.
 
Oh and Brady ranks 14th in all time completion percentage. Right behind Mr. Pick 6, Matt Schaub.

So you can argue about who has the weaker arm but the accuracy piece is settled.
Meanwhile, Brady ranks damn near 1st in everything else, including the only thing that really matters: wins & rings.
Give me Breesus over Brady as well.

Same team, same coach, no fucking chance Brady is better.
Taken together, this is like arguing that Harden could replace Jordan if only he had Phil and the Bulls because he has a higher True Shooting %.
 
Meanwhile, Brady ranks damn near 1st in everything else, including the only thing that really matters: wins & rings.

Taken together, this is like arguing that Harden could replace Jordan if only he had Phil and the Bulls because he has a higher True Shooting %.

Breed has more yards and TDs....

So Brady is better in team stats...
 
Meanwhile, Brady ranks damn near 1st in everything else, including the only thing that really matters: wins & rings.

By that logic, you're saying Peyton Manning was the best QB in the league a couple years ago with Denver because he got a ring?
 
Back
Top