- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 73,578
- Reaction score
- 104,410
So James was providing evidence he raped her? There was video footage of her hanging out with James after the supposed Mcgregor incident.
They basically believed she lied about James but not Mcgregor. The entire jury basically didn’t like Mcgregor, notice how the attorney had to say like 100 times that it’s not about whether or not they like the guy.
Again no.
James claimed they had sex. There was no proof of that.
Not a single trace of DNA or anything. Yet lots of DNA from McGregor.
They believe that James did NOT have sex with her as he claimed.
Which also means he did not rape her, of course
If he could prove he had sex with her it would have helped McGregor a lot.
Thats why he claimed it.....
I like how the DNA, the tampon they had to remove with forceps the testimony from EMTs + doctors means nothing to you.
Its all about how they did not like McGregor. Poor lil McGregor nobody likes him!!
Also the McGregor claim all her bruises was from slipping in a bathtub.
Sounds.... plausible.... (no not really)