Media Boxing legend considers Conor Mcgregor in the same light as Muhammad Ali, even despite recent civil lawsuit

So James was providing evidence he raped her? There was video footage of her hanging out with James after the supposed Mcgregor incident.

They basically believed she lied about James but not Mcgregor. The entire jury basically didn’t like Mcgregor, notice how the attorney had to say like 100 times that it’s not about whether or not they like the guy.

Again no.
James claimed they had sex. There was no proof of that.
Not a single trace of DNA or anything. Yet lots of DNA from McGregor.

They believe that James did NOT have sex with her as he claimed.
Which also means he did not rape her, of course
If he could prove he had sex with her it would have helped McGregor a lot.
Thats why he claimed it.....


I like how the DNA, the tampon they had to remove with forceps the testimony from EMTs + doctors means nothing to you.
Its all about how they did not like McGregor. Poor lil McGregor nobody likes him!!

Also the McGregor claim all her bruises was from slipping in a bathtub.
Sounds.... plausible.... (no not really)
 
Again no.
James claimed they had sex. There was no proof of that.
Not a single trace of DNA or anything. Yet lots of DNA from McGregor.

They believe that James did NOT have sex with her as he claimed.
If he could prove he had sex with her it would have helped McGregor a lot.
Thats why he claimed it.....


I like how the DNA, the tampon they had to remove with forceps the testimony from EMTs + doctors means nothing to you.
Its all about how they did not like McGregor. Poor lil McGregor nobody likes him!!

Also the McGregor claim all her bruises was from slipping in a bathtub.
Sounds.... plausible.... (no not really)

Did you watch the trial? It wasn’t disputed at all that James had sex with her. Both sides pretty much stipulated to that.

I’m guessing you didn’t see the trial.
 
Again no.
James claimed they had sex. There was no proof of that.
Not a single trace of DNA or anything. Yet lots of DNA from McGregor.

They believe that James did NOT have sex with her as he claimed.
Which also means he did not rape her, of course
If he could prove he had sex with her it would have helped McGregor a lot.
Thats why he claimed it.....


I like how the DNA, the tampon they had to remove with forceps the testimony from EMTs + doctors means nothing to you.
Its all about how they did not like McGregor. Poor lil McGregor nobody likes him!!

Also the McGregor claim all her bruises was from slipping in a bathtub.
Sounds.... plausible.... (no not really)

Stop making up lies, why did she sue James?

She is the plaintiff and she decides who to sue. She sued both James and Mcgregor because she claimed both raped her.

You clearly didn’t watch the trial is saying non sense.
 
Stop making up lies, why did she sue James?

She is the plaintiff and she decides who to sue. She sued both James and Mcgregor because she claimed both raped her.

You clearly didn’t watch the trial is saying non sense.

Are you dense?
She sued James BECAUSE HE CLAIMED HE HAD SEX WITH HER!
She said she cant remember them having sex, which would mean she was too drunk to give consent. Do you know what sex with out consent is? RAPE..../ sexual assault

Straight from BBC:
"Ms Hand says she was raped by McGregor and has no recollection of ever having sex with Mr Lawrence."
I guess you did not watch the trial.
 
Are you dense?
She sued James BECAUSE HE CLAIMED HE HAD SEX WITH HER!
She said she cant remember them having sex, which would mean she was too drunk to give consent. Do you know what sex with out consent is? RAPE..../ sexual assault

Straight from BBC:
"Ms Hand says she was raped by McGregor and has no recollection of ever having sex with Mr Lawrence."
I guess you did not watch the trial.

Why would James need to state anything if she didn’t sue him?

She initiated a lawsuit for rape against Mcgregor and James, and THEN James said it was consensual.

Do you know how lawsuits work? Do you know that James was sued so he had to testify to events?

He didn’t volunteer to become a defendant so he can say it was consensual sex.
 
Why would James need to state anything if she didn’t sue him?

She initiated a lawsuit for rape against Mcgregor and James, and THEN James said it was consensual.

Do you know how lawsuits work? Do you know that James was sued so he had to testify to events?

He didn’t volunteer to become a defendant so he can say it was consensual sex.

WTF?
Why are you lying or are you just stupid?

James came out with the claim they had sex BEFORE the trial.
As I recall it he went to the Police saying it back in 2018/19... to defend Conor.
Also why would she sue him if he had not said they had sex?
She had no recollection of them having sex!! " has no recollection of ever having sex with Mr Lawrence."
So he got sued because he said they had sex, which he said before the trial otherwise she could not have sued him.....because she had "no recollection of ever having sex with Mr Lawrence."
 
WTF?
Why are you lying or are you just stupid?

James came out with the claim they had sex BEFORE the trial.
As I recall it he went to the Police saying it back in 2018/19... to defend Conor.
Also why would she sue him if he had not said they had sex?
She had no recollection of them having sex!! " has no recollection of ever having sex with Mr Lawrence."
So he got sued because he said they had sex, which he said before the trial otherwise she could not have sued him.....because she had "no recollection of ever having sex with Mr Lawrence."
Koa peanut brain making an absolute show of himself here and it's hilarious to watch
 
WTF?
Why are you lying or are you just stupid?

James came out with the claim they had sex BEFORE the trial.
As I recall it he went to the Police saying it back in 2018/19... to defend Conor.
Also why would she sue him if he had not said they had sex?
She had no recollection of them having sex!! " has no recollection of ever having sex with Mr Lawrence."
So he got sued because he said they had sex, which he said before the trial otherwise she could not have sued him.....because she had "no recollection of ever having sex with Mr Lawrence."

You realize you file a complaint before a trial and she alleged in the complaint they had sex.

You also realize she gave inconsistent testimony, saying they had sex once and also that she can’t remember how many times it was, James said they had sex three times.

“Lawrence — who was repeatedly asked to slow down by John Fitzgerald SC, his counsel, as he gave evidence — claimed that he had sex three times with Kealey on the day of the alleged rape, at the same time as McGregor and Hand were having sex. She previously told the court that they had sex just once.”


She then also said she couldn’t remember, after previously stated they had sex one time. She also apparently remembers everything about Conor, even things he said.
 
You realize you file a complaint before a trial and she alleged in the complaint they had sex.

You also realize she gave inconsistent testimony, saying they had sex once and also that she can’t remember how many times it was, James said they had sex three times.

“Lawrence — who was repeatedly asked to slow down by John Fitzgerald SC, his counsel, as he gave evidence — claimed that he had sex three times with Kealey on the day of the alleged rape, at the same time as McGregor and Hand were having sex. She previously told the court that they had sex just once.”


She then also said she couldn’t remember, after previously stated they had sex one time. She also apparently remembers everything about Conor, even things he said.

Cool to use a article behind paywall...

So "James said they had sex three times." with Nikita and then "claimed that he had sex three times with Kealey on the day of the alleged rape,"

So 6 times with 2 girls in one night? Dude is a machine...

Could you show a sources where she said they had sex because I have not seen any.
 
Why would James need to state anything if she didn’t sue him?

She initiated a lawsuit for rape against Mcgregor and James, and THEN James said it was consensual.

Do you know how lawsuits work? Do you know that James was sued so he had to testify to events?

He didn’t volunteer to become a defendant so he can say it was consensual sex.

"In a statement that McGregor made to gardaí after being shown pictures of Hand’s injuries, he suggested: “Are you sure she did not have sex with somebody else?”. He then told gardaí that he believed Lawrence had sex with Hand after he had left the Beacon Hotel.

Lawrence then came forward and told gardaí in February 2019 that he had consensual sex with Hand twice on the day in question."

So Conor claims she had sex with some one else and suddenly Lawrence shows up to the police claiming they had sex.. in 2019.

That is why she sued him.... because he in 2019 went to the police claiming they had sex, and as she said during cross at the trial:

"Hand said she had no recollection of ever being with Lawrence, and told the court during cross-examination by John Fitzgerald SC, for Lawrence, that she thought his claim was “a made-up story”. Her case was that if they did have sex, she was in no fit state to consent to it." - Which would make it rape / sexual assault.

Also IF she had said they did have sex why did Conors lawyer not bring that up during the trial? I cant find any info in that.
 
A civil lawsuit is literally a coin flip. The burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence, which literally means 51/49%

Conor is like 2% more likely to be guilty than innocent, big whoop.
So it'd be more reasonable to think he is a rapist than not. Thanks for agreeing.

The woman said both Conor and James raped her.
No she didn't, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

The jury believed James and her had consensual sex after Conor raped her.
No they didn't.


It makes no sense.
Why are you so fucking bad with facts

Did you watch the trial? It wasn’t disputed at all that James had sex with her. Both sides pretty much stipulated to that.

I’m guessing you didn’t see the trial.
You 100% didn't then. Or like most things, it WAS explained to you, but you ignored it/ failed to absorb it.

I was cool telling you that you're a fucking moron every time you post some dumb ass shit, but I started a new thing this past year if just blocking any rape apologists, so thanks for revealing that about yourself.
 
Last edited:
Which McGregor are they talking about? The Power Slap guy?

If so.... I agree.
 
The woman said both Conor and James raped her.
No, she didn't. She said McGregor did.

McGregor and his retarded childhood friend said that he did too.

She said she had no memory of that, and if what they say is true (it wasn't), the he must have raped her too (by definition).
The jury believed James and her had consensual sex after Conor raped her.
No, they didn't. They believed he didn't have sex with her at all, because he didn't. Only McGregor did.
It makes no sense.
It makes no sense TO YOU, because you didn't bother to try to understand what happened. You don't even understand the basic facts of the case.

Stop spreading misinformation about a sexual assault. It's disgusting.
 
Again no.
James claimed they had sex. There was no proof of that.
Not a single trace of DNA or anything. Yet lots of DNA from McGregor.

They believe that James did NOT have sex with her as he claimed.
Which also means he did not rape her, of course
If he could prove he had sex with her it would have helped McGregor a lot.
Thats why he claimed it.....


I like how the DNA, the tampon they had to remove with forceps the testimony from EMTs + doctors means nothing to you.
Its all about how they did not like McGregor. Poor lil McGregor nobody likes him!!

Also the McGregor claim all her bruises was from slipping in a bathtub.
Sounds.... plausible.... (no not really)
People have explained this to him repeatedly. He has no interest in the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
So James was providing evidence he raped her? There was video footage of her hanging out with James after the supposed Mcgregor incident.

They basically believed she lied about James but not Mcgregor. The entire jury basically didn’t like Mcgregor, notice how the attorney had to say like 100 times that it’s not about whether or not they like the guy.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
Back
Top