Bowflex shatters under load

  • Thread starter Thread starter Achim
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bamaispriceless said:
Take this as a sign from the Strength and Power Gods. They want you to trash the bowflex and buy a powerrack.

Do you have a shred of proof that there are more unused Bowflexes than
unused free weights, or ski exercisers or steppers, for that matter?

Your childish hyperbole shows that your antagonism for the Bowflex
isn't based on reason or reflection but on an unhealthy emotional
identification with your fitness routine.
 
I'm glad I never went for those cheap gimmicky machines.
 
bacon said:
You lost me right here...

I am not surprised.

I've talked to a number of trainers about Superslow protocol, looking
for an instructor in my region, and haven't run into one yet who knows
anything about it, never mind having tried it.

And the nearest Superslow instructor, about four mountain ranges and
six hundred air miles away, has been a trainer for twenty years, and a
master Superslow instructor for three or four years. You'd think that
with Ellington Darden, probably the best known Superslow promoter in
the world, endorsing the Bowflex, every Superslow trainer would at
least have looked at one. But no, he's never used one, and doesn't
know how or whether Superslow could be adapted to this apparatus.


So I'd say the strength training community is a pretty sluggish lot
when it comes to seeking out and adopting new techniques or equipment,
and trainers are probably the last group to go out on a limb and
clamour for a change of equipment. Besides, the Bowflex's small
storage footprint, light weight, and relatively safe use (and
pleeeeease don't tell me free weights aren't dangerous, I've got a
hole in my floor to remind me otherwise), will tend to take customers
away from gyms and trainers. So promoting its use is not in the
economic interest of trainers.
 
Im glad i didn't read past the first 2 sentences. my head hurts. ....




















both of them
 
Achim, you must sell bowflexes. Are you copying and pasting this stuff from a brochure or something? i really cant think of a bigger waste of time or energy than a bowflex. It far surpasses even a smith machine in sheer vagina-ness
 
First off, Ellington has gotten away from SuperSlow. He uses more of a approach that is more along the lines of HIT.

Superslow is crap. Their belief system is total bull****. Anyone who tells you the gym HAS to be a certain temperature, or that you only workout ONCE a week for 20 minutes, or the trainer who is working you out HAS to wear a full business suit, or that CARDIO is worthless, or that the guy that came up with SuperSlow barely has a high school degree, and I know he didn't even go to college.

Sorry to hear about your Bowflex. I've been on that machine before, and there is some good that can be had with it, but if it's falling apart on you, it's hard to justify saying it's a good piece of equipment.
 
Isn't SuperSlow protocol what the teach the retards at day school?
 
Achim said:
I am not surprised.

I've talked to a number of trainers about Superslow protocol, looking
for an instructor in my region, and haven't run into one yet who knows
anything about it, never mind having tried it.

And the nearest Superslow instructor, about four mountain ranges and
six hundred air miles away, has been a trainer for twenty years, and a
master Superslow instructor for three or four years. You'd think that
with Ellington Darden, probably the best known Superslow promoter in
the world, endorsing the Bowflex, every Superslow trainer would at
least have looked at one. But no, he's never used one, and doesn't
know how or whether Superslow could be adapted to this apparatus.


So I'd say the strength training community is a pretty sluggish lot
when it comes to seeking out and adopting new techniques or equipment,
and trainers are probably the last group to go out on a limb and
clamour for a change of equipment. Besides, the Bowflex's small
storage footprint, light weight, and relatively safe use (and
pleeeeease don't tell me free weights aren't dangerous, I've got a
hole in my floor to remind me otherwise), will tend to take customers
away from gyms and trainers. So promoting its use is not in the
economic interest of trainers.

Maybe that's because this super slow protocol doesn't work, not because the strength training community is lazy. How can you tell me that the bowflex is safer than free weights when you just had one explode in your house. God forbid you use while around the family pet or your child and this happens.
 
Achim said:
Do you have a shred of proof that there are more unused Bowflexes than
unused free weights, or ski exercisers or steppers, for that matter?

Your childish hyperbole shows that your antagonism for the Bowflex
isn't based on reason or reflection but on an unhealthy emotional
identification with your fitness routine.


I love how everyone always calls bama childish or immature. i love it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top