- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 48,889
- Reaction score
- 31,238
Well, here is the thing. The backpack of belongings and the shoe with the foot still in it was found at a distance estimated to be 12 hours away. The 911 calls make it even more unlikely that it was an animal attack because they occurred for days. Had they been attacked and killed there would be no 911 calls. If only one of them was attacked, why didn't the other just go back and get help? The series of photos 8 days after they went missing is also strange.
Check out this map of where they found the backpacks and bones. If map is too small to read try this link.
http://mostlymystery.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/enhanced-sinaproc-search-map.jpg
Totally agree, if a big cat attacked, it can only kill one person at one time, the other would've fled. Total bullshit, as is the river scenario. They were definitely murdered IMO, but the whole situation is really odd. They were definitely trying to raise alarms with the phonecalls etc but why wouldn't the kidnapper take their phones?! Surely that's the first thing you would do if you kidnapped two women? Take anything they could use to communicate with the outside world? Really baffling case, one of the only ones I've read where I've come away without a concrete idea of what I thought happened!