Social Biden Just Gave a Final Middle Finger to the Working Class on the Way Out


President Biden may be on his way out of office, but his administration has used his final weeks in office to give one last kick in the pants to working-class Americans. As LandLine Magazine revealed last week, the Department of Homeland Security has made an additional 70,000 H-2B visas available for next year, doubling the number of the previous year, when 1,500 were given to transportation occupations like trucking. 130,000 visas might not sound like a lot in a country as populous as the United States, and 1,500 given to truckers even less so, but when you consider market conditions and just how bad the trucking industry has gotten, you start to see how much of a middle finger to truck drivers this really is.

How bad have things gotten for trucking? The online trucking industry magazine FreightWaves has an entire section of their website dedicated to nothing but trucking company bankruptcies and truck driver layoffs. A quick scan through the most recent dozen of 82 articles for 2024 alone show that over 4,000 truckers in the United States were laid off in October and November, and thousands more are at risk of being laid off as the companies they work for seek bankruptcy protection. This number doesn't include many self employed truckers whose business closures are much more difficult to track.

Given this fact, what on earth would cause DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to push for more visas for foreign truckers? He gave us a window into his thinking recently in a November press release. "There are employers across the country that would suffer greatly without H-2B workers," Mayorkas said. "Authorizing these supplemental visas helps U.S. employers fill those positions ... It helps fuel our economy and reduce irregular migration while also providing a safe and lawful pathway to the United States for noncitizens who are prepared to work."

It's always about the employers for Mayorkas.

Perhaps Mayorkas still believes in the debunked "driver shortage narrative" that corporate lobbying groups like the American Trucking Association have been pushing for decades in an effort to extract taxpayer subsidies for their in-house CDL schools. But there isn't a trucker shortage; there's a retention crisis, the result of plummeting wages that can be traced back to the deregulation of the business, brought to us by another Democrat, Jimmy Carter, and his Motor Carrier Act of 1980. Thanks to Carter, the average truck driver's salary today is half of what it was in 1980.

The Biden administration's latest slap in the face is exactly the kind of policy that has kept truckers' salaries in the toilet. Like so much else under the Democrats, when greeted with bad working conditions, their answer is, let's bring in more immigrants who won't complain. The trucking industry in America has come to rely on migrant labor instead of improving pay and conditions for American workers.

Biden gave one last FU to the working class by thousands of H-2B visas to further devalue the wages of truckers.
“I have many H-1B visas on my properties. I’ve been a believer in H-1B. I have used it many times. It’s a great program,” Trump said.
 
I'm shocked to find out populists are against average American's being screwed over. It's probably because they're racist. Its the only possible explanation. 🥴
Wow, that's completely irrelevant to what I typed. I'm disappointed I even bothered reading it.

Let's try this again: A group of people say that they are not against all immigration, only illegal immigration. They do not want freeloaders. However when presented with immigration that is legal and only possible by being working members of society, that self same group of people also opposes those immigrants, albeit for different reasons.

Hence, the previous claim that they only opposed illegal immigration was unlikely to be true. They always opposed both legal and illegal immigration. Specifically, they perceive all immigration as a threat to themselves...they simply weren't honest enough, or self aware enough, to acknowledge it.

Got it? They oppose illegal immigrants because they broke the law and are a drain on the nation's financial resources. They oppose high skilled legal immigrants because they believe that legal immigrants will work for too little money thus reducing their comparable wages over time.

There is no form of immigration that they are okay with. Maybe legal immigrants whose job opportunities are limited to low wage work?
 
Wow, that's completely irrelevant to what I typed. I'm disappointed I even bothered reading it.

Let's try this again: A group of people say that they are not against all immigration, only illegal immigration. They do not want freeloaders. However when presented with immigration that is legal and only possible by being working members of society, that self same group of people also opposes those immigrants, albeit for different reasons.

Hence, the previous claim that they only opposed illegal immigration was unlikely to be true. They always opposed both legal and illegal immigration. Specifically, they perceive all immigration as a threat to themselves...they simply weren't honest enough, or self aware enough, to acknowledge it.

Got it? They oppose illegal immigrants because they broke the law and are a drain on the nation's financial resources. They oppose high skilled legal immigrants because they believe that legal immigrants will work for too little money thus reducing their comparable wages over time.

There is no form of immigration that they are okay with. Maybe legal immigrants whose job opportunities are limited to low wage work?

How about a form of immigration where they become citizens and are protected under the same labor laws as the rest of the population? Hire them at the same industry standards that are set and let’s see how empathetic these billionaires are to them really.
 
How about a form of immigration where they become citizens and are protected under the same labor laws as the rest of the population? Hire them at the same industry standards that are set and let’s see how empathetic these billionaires are to them really.
They are protected under the same labor laws. Labor laws apply to the employer. Wages, benefits, etc. are the same for immigrant labor as it is for citizens.

What labor laws, relevant to wages and working conditions, don't apply to legal immigrants?

Also, I'm curious about the citizenship piece. If they work for 6 years, they can apply for a green card (I think that's still the rule). After the green card, they can apply for citizenship 5 years after that. So 11 years. You want to accelerate that?
 
They are protected under the same labor laws. Labor laws apply to the employer. Wages, benefits, etc. are the same for immigrant labor as it is for citizens.

What labor laws, relevant to wages and working conditions, don't apply to legal immigrants?

Also, I'm curious about the citizenship piece. If they work for 6 years, they can apply for a green card (I think that's still the rule). After the green card, they can apply for citizenship 5 years after that. So 11 years. You want to accelerate that?
The right to unionize and strike

Generally speaking, in order to maintain valid H-1B status in the United States, an H-1B employee is required to remain employed with her H-1B employer, under the terms set forth in the H-1B petition. In the absence of a strike, a failure to remain employed can be considered a violation of H-1B status.
 

President Biden may be on his way out of office, but his administration has used his final weeks in office to give one last kick in the pants to working-class Americans. As LandLine Magazine revealed last week, the Department of Homeland Security has made an additional 70,000 H-2B visas available for next year, doubling the number of the previous year, when 1,500 were given to transportation occupations like trucking. 130,000 visas might not sound like a lot in a country as populous as the United States, and 1,500 given to truckers even less so, but when you consider market conditions and just how bad the trucking industry has gotten, you start to see how much of a middle finger to truck drivers this really is.

How bad have things gotten for trucking? The online trucking industry magazine FreightWaves has an entire section of their website dedicated to nothing but trucking company bankruptcies and truck driver layoffs. A quick scan through the most recent dozen of 82 articles for 2024 alone show that over 4,000 truckers in the United States were laid off in October and November, and thousands more are at risk of being laid off as the companies they work for seek bankruptcy protection. This number doesn't include many self employed truckers whose business closures are much more difficult to track.

Given this fact, what on earth would cause DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to push for more visas for foreign truckers? He gave us a window into his thinking recently in a November press release. "There are employers across the country that would suffer greatly without H-2B workers," Mayorkas said. "Authorizing these supplemental visas helps U.S. employers fill those positions ... It helps fuel our economy and reduce irregular migration while also providing a safe and lawful pathway to the United States for noncitizens who are prepared to work."

It's always about the employers for Mayorkas.

Perhaps Mayorkas still believes in the debunked "driver shortage narrative" that corporate lobbying groups like the American Trucking Association have been pushing for decades in an effort to extract taxpayer subsidies for their in-house CDL schools. But there isn't a trucker shortage; there's a retention crisis, the result of plummeting wages that can be traced back to the deregulation of the business, brought to us by another Democrat, Jimmy Carter, and his Motor Carrier Act of 1980. Thanks to Carter, the average truck driver's salary today is half of what it was in 1980.

The Biden administration's latest slap in the face is exactly the kind of policy that has kept truckers' salaries in the toilet. Like so much else under the Democrats, when greeted with bad working conditions, their answer is, let's bring in more immigrants who won't complain. The trucking industry in America has come to rely on migrant labor instead of improving pay and conditions for American workers.

Biden gave one last FU to the working class by thousands of H-2B visas to further devalue the wages of truckers.
LandLine Magazine? Is that a trucker journal or something?
 
The right to unionize and strike

Generally speaking, in order to maintain valid H-1B status in the United States, an H-1B employee is required to remain employed with her H-1B employer, under the terms set forth in the H-1B petition. In the absence of a strike, a failure to remain employed can be considered a violation of H-1B status.
Why lie?

Here's what you left out:
However, in the event of a strike, an employee currently employed in valid H-1B status will not be considered in violation her H-1B status if she chooses to participate in a strike.
It's literally from the same site that you lifted your quote from.

So, H-1B workers can both unionize and strike.

Again -- what relevant labor law are you claiming doesn't apply to h-1b workers?
 
NO WAY is that Brandon's final F You.

Worst POtuS in history will try to stop the inauguration in any way he possibly can.
 
Last edited:
So maybe we shouldn't cheer on corporations importing slaves instead of paying citizens a decent wage.

Start paying truckers $130,000 a year like they used to make and OuT oF cOnTrOl InFlAtIoN! will take hold. The price of those precious eggs will go through the roof.

It's a real tightrope.
 
Start paying truckers $130,000 a year like they used to make and OuT oF cOnTrOl InFlAtIoN! will take hold. The price of those precious eggs will go through the roof.

It's a real tightrope.

Why didn't paying reasonable wages to truckers cause out of control inflation when they used to do it before?
 
Why didn't paying reasonable wages to truckers cause out of control inflation when they used to do it before?

Probably because CEOs and upper management salaries were a lot lower back then and closer to everyday workers' salaries.

You may think that's a good idea but remember, leveling of incomes is cuck, soyboy, liberal, commie with pink hair stuff.
 
Probably because CEOs and upper management salaries were a lot lower back then and closer to everyday workers' salaries.

You may think that's a good idea but remember, leveling of incomes is cuck, soyboy, liberal, commie with pink hair stuff.

You're not much of a math whiz, huh?


You could cut these guys salary and bonuses to $1 and it would pay for a reasonable wage for like 80 drivers. What about all the other drivers?
 
You're not much of a math whiz, huh?


You could cut these guys salary and bonuses to $1 and it would pay for a reasonable wage for like 80 drivers. What about all the other drivers?

You're not much of a reading wiz, huh?

I included "and upper management" there for a reason. The gap between the very rich and the poor includes them as well.

And the salaries of the higher ups in transportation alone can't cause this, all industries have contributed. The highest earners in the finance, banking, tire, oil, construction etc., areas have all seen their wages increase, driving up the cost of everything they're involved with.
 
You're not much of a reading wiz, huh?

I included "and upper management" there for a reason. The gap between the very rich and the poor includes them as well.

And the salaries of the higher ups in transportation alone can't cause this, all industries have contributed. The highest earners in the finance, banking, tire, oil, construction etc., areas have all seen their wages increase, driving up the cost of everything they're involved with.

The issue is the loophole they have now to hire foreign slaves. Same issue as it ever was all the way back to the founding of America.

As long as there are slaves, there will always be an incentive to use slave labour.

They managed to brainwash people into thinking if you have a problem with companies bringing in foreign slaves to undercut salaries that means you're racist.
 
The issue is the loophole they have now to hire foreign slaves. Same issue as it ever was all the way back to the founding of America.

As long as there are slaves, there will always be an incentive to use slave labour.

They managed to brainwash people into thinking if you have a problem with companies bringing in foreign slaves to undercut salaries that means you're racist.

C heap labor is the name of the game, that's why I keep going back to

rainbow-spongebob.gif


If you REALLY want to get rid of it, you gotta do away with this system. Or at least make serious, drastic changes to it. If not, it'll just be another form of competition again and again.
 
Back
Top